On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:50 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
You need to ask yourself if this is a real problem, or something
you're just imagining. Mysql generally works fine, 50,000 messages a
day at 12 queries each, equates to several queries per second. This is
an easy load.
That is a comfort
I have two mailservers behind a firewall and they are on the same subnet e.g.
A: @test.sk 192.168.1.5
B: @test.eu 192.168.1.6
MX records in DNS on internet are e.g.
A: @test.sk 194.1.1.5
B: @test.eu 194.1.1.6
On the A server I have setup aliases file to forward mails to server B, but it
is not
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:00, Noel Jones wrote:
Did you run postfix reload?
yes
Do you have postfix 2.3 or later?
2.5.7
Show evidence. postconf -n output, contents of your
message, etc.
do i really have to :/
If you ask for help and can't figure it out on
2009/7/23 Clunk Werclick clunk.wercl...@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk:
That is a comfort to know. My main concern was this hammering was not
optimal, but it is welcome to make as many queries as it likes if it
does not crash the database server. Perhaps Postgresql would be a bit
more manly ? but
Clunk Werclick wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:50 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
You need to ask yourself if this is a real problem, or something
you're just imagining. Mysql generally works fine, 50,000 messages a
day at 12 queries each, equates to several queries per second. This is
an easy
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 18:47 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
From:
Barney Desmond
barneydesm...@gmail.com
To:
postfix users list
postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject:
Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:24 +0200, Thomas Gelf wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:50 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
You need to ask yourself if this is a real problem, or something
you're just imagining. Mysql generally works fine, 50,000 messages a
day at 12 queries
Clunk Werclick wrote:
That is very reassuring Thomas, thank you.
Now I don't know if I should stay with SQL or drop to maps ? It is
easier to configure with SQL from a web based front end - but to get SQL
to dump to flat files and Postmap is also only a few Perl lines. What is
a fool to do
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:57 +0200, Thomas Gelf wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
That is very reassuring Thomas, thank you.
Now I don't know if I should stay with SQL or drop to maps ? It is
easier to configure with SQL from a web based front end - but to get SQL
to dump to flat files and
Benny Pedersen:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 02:29, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
% postconf message_strip_charters
postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: unknown parameter
be
Clunk Werclick wrote:
Thank you Thomas. I stick with Mysql and worry if I ever have to set up
a server so big it fails. If that happens I have lots of £$£ and pay
someone else to do it whilst I sit on beach sipping wine.
Once that happens: let me know! I'll join you at the beach and configure
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Benny Pedersen:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 02:29, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
% postconf message_strip_charters
postconf: warning:
Hi,
I am trying to build a Postfix cluster for a large scalable company
network (e.g. no. of users 1000 - 30,000). For instance :-
Domain : example.com
Server #1: server1.example.com
Server #2: server2.example.com
.
The account information will be stored in a LDAP database, such that the
On Thu, July 23, 2009 12:31, Wietse Venema wrote:
Show 'postconf -n' command output.
http://wordpress.junc.org/?p=5
resolved fixed here
--
xpoint
Hi All,
I have postfix mostly setup and working, everything seems to work except
aliases.
I have an alias setup
testalias:ema...@mydomain.com, ema...@mydomain.com
I also use virtual mappings, so I have a line like this:
someem...@mydomain.com testalias
However, when I email
On Thursday 23 July 2009 14:53:01 John Mok wrote:
I am new to Postfix. Is Postfix capable to build the cluster without
local user accounts on the servers?
Yes.
See virtual_mailbox_maps, virtual_mailbox_domains etc
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html#virtual_mailbox
When I designed
Justin Piszcz wrote:
I also see a similar issue:
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: MIME-Version
Mainly from veritas-bu and asterisk-users mailing lists, is there a
work-around or fix for this?
Justin.
This is just an informational message. You can ignore it.
If
On Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 Benny Pedersen wrote:
or add sieve protocol to zarafa
I'd wish that, but that's not in my possibility.
Just why is there not a simple sieve implementation that rewrites mails
going to x...@y.z to x+mymail...@y.z and re-calls postfix again. That would
be a simple
On Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
User dovecot deliver instead of procmail when doing local delivery.
That's it.
From dovecots documentation in LDA.Sieve.txt:
NB: Sieve doesn't support running external programs.
And in VirtualUsers.txt:
It's not possible to use the Sieve plugin
2009/7/24 Postfix postfix_l...@ibcnetwork.com:
I have an alias setup
testalias: ema...@mydomain.com, ema...@mydomain.com
I also use virtual mappings, so I have a line like this:
someem...@mydomain.com testalias
That sounds about right.
However, when I email someem...@mydomain.com, it
On Thu, July 23, 2009 16:27, Noel Jones wrote:
Justin Piszcz wrote:
I also see a similar issue:
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: MIME-Version
Mainly from veritas-bu and asterisk-users mailing lists, is there a
work-around or fix for this?
contact sender, he uses a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/09 16:33, Michael Monnerie wrote:
Ah, this was s close. What a pity.
Maybe there's another way?
What about a postfix milter?
I just need a sieve that can call an external program to deliver mails.
Is that really not existing?
Why
On Thu, July 23, 2009 16:32, Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 Benny Pedersen wrote:
or add sieve protocol to zarafa
I'd wish that, but that's not in my possibility.
tryed http://horde.org/ ?
Just why is there not a simple sieve implementation that rewrites mails
going to
On Donnerstag 23 Juli 2009 Benny Pedersen wrote:
Just why is there not a simple sieve implementation that rewrites
mails going to x...@y.z to x+mymail...@y.z and re-calls postfix again.
this can be done with postfix header test imho, and dovecot can use +
addresing
You miss the point: I
Thanks,
Putting the fqn in the virtual map:
someem...@mydomain.comtestal...@fqdn.of.host
worked. I didn't see this in the online docs, but I may have missed it.
- Original Message -
From: Barney Desmond barneydesm...@gmail.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Thursday, July
On Donnerstag 23 Juli 2009 Victoriano Giralt wrote:
Why don't you just call the external program for the delivery as
you call sieve. In my systems we call dovecot's deliver like this:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=v:v
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Donnerstag 23 Juli 2009 Benny Pedersen wrote:
Just why is there not a simple sieve implementation that rewrites
mails going to x...@y.z to x+mymail...@y.z and re-calls postfix again.
this can be done with postfix header test imho, and dovecot can use +
Sending mail using SSL just hangs. Logs show connection, then disconnect.
Sending mail using TSL works.
Adding the following to main.cf didn't help:
smtpd_tls_protocols = SSLv1 SSLv2 SSLv3 TLSv1
The reason for sticking with SSL is for Outlook 2003 that doesn't have
an option for TSL.
Thanks
S. Berch wrote:
Sending mail using SSL just hangs. Logs show connection, then disconnect.
Sending mail using TSL works.
Adding the following to main.cf didn't help:
smtpd_tls_protocols = SSLv1 SSLv2 SSLv3 TLSv1
The reason for sticking with SSL is for Outlook 2003 that doesn't have
an
How can I forward emails to a specific mailserver ip address?
I do not want postfix to make DNS lookup for actual mailserver ip address.
I am using /etc/aliases
u...@domain1.com: u...@domain2.com
I would like to specify mailserver's ip address for @domain2.com in some
configuration file. Is
man transport
David
On Thursday 23 July 2009, Peter Macko wrote:
How can I forward emails to a specific mailserver ip address?
I do not want postfix to make DNS lookup for actual mailserver ip address.
I am using /etc/aliases
u...@domain1.com: u...@domain2.com
I would like to specify
Peter Macko wrote:
How can I forward emails to a specific mailserver ip address?
I do not want postfix to make DNS lookup for actual mailserver ip address.
I am using /etc/aliases
u...@domain1.com: u...@domain2.com
I would like to specify mailserver's ip address for @domain2.com in some
I asked a similar question on the Amavis list, but as I think about it, it
might be more appropriate to handle in postfix, before the mail ever gets to
amavis.
Currently postfix accepts mail for a number of domains, and all mail gets sent
though amavisd-new using the configuration below, and is
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Now if you can tell me the way to get the e-mail out of that deliver
program again into postfix, with the recipient rewritten to
user+mail...@x.y, then you made my day.
I can be terribly wrong here, but isn't this what amavisd-new does when
working together with
On Thu, July 23, 2009 18:20, Michael Monnerie wrote:
Now if you can tell me the way to get the e-mail out of that deliver
program again into postfix, with the recipient rewritten to
user+mail...@x.y, then you made my day.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
see the -m option on delivery
I'm a little confused by this entry in my log:
Received: from adsl-dynamic-pool-xxx.fpt.vn (unknown [118.71.113.83])
by mx.myserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB68800D3
for __use...@aktzero.com; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:23:54 + (UTC)
If I `host 118.71.113.83`, I get:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
I'm a little confused by this entry in my log:
Received: from adsl-dynamic-pool-xxx.fpt.vn (unknown [118.71.113.83])
by mx.myserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB68800D3
for __use...@aktzero.com; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:23:54 + (UTC)
If I `host
Terry Carmen a écrit :
I asked a similar question on the Amavis list, but as I think about it, it
might be more appropriate to handle in postfix, before the mail ever gets to
amavis.
Currently postfix accepts mail for a number of domains, and all mail gets sent
though amavisd-new using the
Peter Macko a écrit :
I have two mailservers behind a firewall and they are on the same subnet
e.g.
A: @test.sk 192.168.1.5
B: @test.eu 192.168.1.6
MX records in DNS on internet are e.g.
A: @test.sk 194.1.1.5
B: @test.eu 194.1.1.6
On the A server I have setup aliases file to forward
Postfix a écrit :
Thanks,
Putting the fqn in the virtual map:
someem...@mydomain.comtestal...@fqdn.of.host
worked. I didn't see this in the online docs, but I may have missed it.
Addresses with a domain part get a @$myorigin added. see the ADDRESS
REWRITE README or the entry for
Terry Carmen a écrit :
I asked a similar question on the Amavis list, but as I think about it, it
might be more appropriate to handle in postfix, before the mail ever gets to
amavis.
Currently postfix accepts mail for a number of domains, and all mail gets
sent
though amavisd-new using
I want postfix to forward email from a few of my domains to my gmail
account, so I followed the Postfix Virtual Domain Hosting
HowTohttp://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html#forwardingfor
forwarding. Here are the changes I made to
main.cf and /etc/postfix/virtual:
main.cf:
...
* Andrew Thompson andre...@aktzero.com:
I'm a little confused by this entry in my log:
Received: from adsl-dynamic-pool-xxx.fpt.vn (unknown [118.71.113.83])
by mx.myserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB68800D3
for __use...@aktzero.com; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:23:54 + (UTC)
If I
Sure, sure. I realize Google is Google and Postfix is Postfix.
My purpose in mailing to this list is questioning whether there are
additional steps I need to take when configuring my postfix server so that
my mail won't be blacklisted.
I'm reading a little on reverse DNS right now and it doesn't
Ryan O'Toole wrote:
Sure, sure. I realize Google is Google and Postfix is Postfix.
My purpose in mailing to this list is questioning whether there are
additional steps I need to take when configuring my postfix server so
that my mail won't be blacklisted.
I'm reading a little on reverse
On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com
wrote:
I asked a similar question on the Amavis list, but as I think about
it, it
might be more appropriate to handle in postfix, before the mail ever
gets to
amavis.
Currently postfix accepts mail for a number of domains,
Hello,
I am wanting to accept mail for mydomain but I have users that don't need
system (unix) accounts and I really don't want to create them just for their
mail. Is there an easy way to lookup these users outside the local table?
Also, what happens to my system users if another table is
Thanks Aaron!
Your suggestion turns out to be the problem. I was sending my tests from
gmail, though I was using a different account than my gmail account for the
from address. Apparently, gmail doesn't like that. Sending from that same
address but using a different mail client, the mail goes to
Hello,
I would like to receive mail at mydomain for a few users that are not
system (unix) users. I know I can add them as system users, however, from
a security standpoint I'd rather not. How can I have postfix deliever
mail to them? Do I have to create a new local lookup table? If that is
Perhaps you could use multiple postfix instances; use use
foo_transport (instead of content_filter) to route mail to amavisd-
new. For domains or recipients that should skip the filter, use a
transport_map entry to route directly from first - second instance of
Postfix, bypassing
Rodman Frowert wrote:
Hello,
I would like to receive mail at mydomain for a few users that are not
system (unix) users. I know I can add them as system users, however, from
a security standpoint I'd rather not. How can I have postfix deliever
mail to them? Do I have to create a new local
On Jul 23, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com
wrote:
Perhaps you could use multiple postfix instances; use use
foo_transport (instead of content_filter) to route mail to amavisd-
new. For domains or recipients that should skip the filter, use a
transport_map entry to route
Joris Dobbelsteen wrote, On 22-07-09 00:27:
Wietse Venema wrote, On 21-07-09 23:12:
Joris Dobbelsteen:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
I'm using Postfix 2.3 (with debian etch, but I'm planning to go to
postfix 2.5 with debian lenny). I'm using the postfix box solely for
Brian Evans wrote:
The reason for sticking with SSL is for Outlook 2003 that doesn't
have an option for TSL.
SSL in older versions of Outlook (pre-2007 to my understanding)
means the depreciated smtps port 465. Postfix supports this using
wrapper mode and there is an example in your
Joris Dobbelsteen:
direct6 unix - - - - - smtp
-o inet_protocol=ipv6
% postconf inet_protocol
postconf: warning: inet_protocol: unknown parameter
Wietse
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Andrew Thompson wrote:
I'm a little confused by this entry in my log:
Received: from adsl-dynamic-pool-xxx.fpt.vn (unknown [118.71.113.83])
by mx.myserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB68800D3
for __use...@aktzero.com; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:23:54 + (UTC)
I ma having a spot of trouble disabling SSLv2 on a Postfix 2.5.1
installation (from Fedora 9 repo). Here is my postconf:
$ postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
Benny Pedersen wrote:
yes this is clear to me its is so, but i dont know why self signed
ssl is being used so much when there is plenty of good trusted
signers :/
There's little advantage to using CAcert or other free signing
authorities compared to self-signed, since not even Firefox has
Hi,
I managed to add canoical rewritting, but now I am stuck with postfix
trying to deliver the message to the canonical name and not to the
proper Unix login name.
Using sendmail -bv o...@cs.ait.ac.th I get:
--463023A3834.1248410743/mail2.cs.ait.ac.th
Content-Description: Notification
59 matches
Mail list logo