Noel Jones schrieb:
Joerg Thuemmler wrote:
Hi,
im using postfix as mta for automatic mail sending out of our db. All db
users a logged in as the same (linux) user, as it's a terminal based
system. So a created mail has usually db_user@domain.tld from and
return-path headers. Of course
-Original Message-
I'm considering FreeBSD as an alternative, but I was wondering what
people think of FreeBSD as a platform for Postfix. It's obviously not
as easy to maintain as Ubuntu, but it does have a reputation for
stability. Any thoughts, recommendations or experiences would
* Guy wyldf...@gmail.com:
I'm considering FreeBSD as an alternative, but I was wondering what
people think of FreeBSD as a platform for Postfix. It's obviously not
as easy to maintain as Ubuntu, but it does have a reputation for
stability. Any thoughts, recommendations or experiences would be
Thanks for all the input. Now that I know so many people are happy
with FreeBSD as a base for their Postfix machines I'll definitely be
having a look at it as a possibility for the future.
Thanks again.
Guy
--
Don't just do something...sit there!
Stefan Förster wrote:
The documentation at http://www.postfix.org/INSTALL.html#4 mentions
that earlier versions of Postfix were supported on FreeBSD 2.x to 5.x.
I think it's very likely that you can run recent Postfix versions on
newer FreeBSD releases, too.
Ack,
I have FreeBSD 7.1
Hello,
I have the following problem with my postfix configuration:
If i send an email from gmail to a valid mailbox / alias on my server it
works fine:
Aug 18 10:57:52 server postfix/smtpd[17528]: connect from
mail-bw0-f205.google.com[209.85.218.205]
Aug 18 10:57:52 server postfix/smtpd[17528]:
Mikael Bak wrote:
Stefan Förster wrote:
The documentation at http://www.postfix.org/INSTALL.html#4 mentions
that earlier versions of Postfix were supported on FreeBSD 2.x to 5.x.
I think it's very likely that you can run recent Postfix versions on
newer FreeBSD releases, too.
Ack,
I
* Guy wyldf...@gmail.com:
I'm considering FreeBSD as an alternative, but I was wondering what
people think of FreeBSD as a platform for Postfix. It's obviously not
as easy to maintain as Ubuntu, but it does have a reputation for
stability. Any thoughts, recommendations or experiences would be
2009/8/18 Jaroslaw Grzabel ja...@meil.me:
I'm wondering is there any way to configure postfix, to check content of
messages which contains ... let say more than 10 recipients, scan those
and check contents in looking for un.sub.scribe link (or particular words)
and if found pass messages if
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
It's unprodictive to kill off Postfix under overload. At the very
least you should increase your 35-second deadline.
Yes I did increase it to 120 seconds. I understand just killing and
restarting postfix is not a solution.
As a test I switched
Jeroen van Aart:
Aug 15 02:55:06 prod101 postfix/master[9402]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/qmgr pid 9582 exit status 1
Good. Now look for error/fatal/warning loggings BEFORE this record.
Wietse
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Look for obvious signs of trouble
Adrian Dinu wrote:
Problem is when i send an email to an alias or mailbox that is not
valid in my database:
Aug 18 10:56:20 server postfix/smtpd[17528]: connect from
mail-bw0-f205.google.com http://mail-bw0-f205.google.com[209.85.218.205]
Aug 18 10:56:20 server postfix/smtpd[17528]: warning:
I can't submit to this list
On 8/18/2009 9:42 AM, Hilel New wrote:
I can't submit to this list
You just did...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Eduardo J?nior:
and I have some doubts.
This:
With Postfix 2.4 and later, a message is returned as either message/rfc822
(the complete original) or as text/rfc822-headers (the headers only)
does means that if my postifxis 2.4 the body of the message sent
doesn't included in
the bounce
* Hilel New hile...@gmail.com:
I am looking for reading material about sending bulk mail. Tips and
tricks, things to avoid, etc. Can you recommend one?
Use a MLM (like Mailman)
Use VERP
Read
On 17-Aug-2009, at 03:25, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
The 450 error triggers the spammer to retry sending the mail.
In point of fact, if it is a spammer sending you the mail, a 450 error
is often enough to dissuade them. This is the principle behind
greylisting.
However, if these are real
On 18-Aug-2009, at 07:42, Hilel New wrote:
I can't submit to this list
LIES!
--
When cheese gets its picture taken, what does it say?
After reading (and implementing) http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html#hangup
I was wondering if there is any reason not to extend this behavior
to 127.0.0.4-8 (the XBL)?
Also, why would I want:
8 rbl_reply_maps = ${stress?hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_reply_maps}
Is there a reason I would
mail_version = 2.3.3
postconf | egrep virtual_alias_maps
proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps, $mydestination,
$virtual_alias_maps, $virtual_alias_domains, $virtual_mailbox_maps,
$virtual_mailbox_domains, $relay_recipient_maps, $relay_domains,
$canonical_maps, $sender_canonical_maps,
-- Original Message --
From: Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com
Reply-To: lcon...@go2france.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:08:59 +0200
mail_version = 2.3.3
postconf | egrep virtual_alias_maps
proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps, $mydestination,
LuKreme wrote:
After reading (and implementing)
http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html#hangup I was wondering if
there is any reason not to extend this behavior to 127.0.0.4-8 (the XBL)?
Also, why would I want:
8 rbl_reply_maps = ${stress?hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_reply_maps}
Is there a
Hi,
i'd like to protect some internal accounts as described at
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html
Currently, I have the following setup:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_pipelining
permit_inet_interfaces
permit_sasl_authenticated
reject_non_fqdn_hostname
-- Original Message --
From: Brian Evans - Postfix List grkni...@scent-team.com
Reply-To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:58:43 -0400
Len Conrad wrote:
-- Original Message --
From:
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
This is the real problem.
Search the logs just before this for a qmgr[9582] (error|fatal|panic).
Thanks for the pointer. I don't find any indication that qmgr was having
a problem, below are the last log entries:
Aug 15 02:08:31 prod101 postfix/qmgr[9582]:
Len Conrad wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: Brian Evans - Postfix List grkni...@scent-team.com
Reply-To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:58:43 -0400
Len Conrad wrote:
-- Original Message
LuKreme wrote:
On 18-Aug-2009, at 10:42, Noel Jones wrote:
The STRESS_README was written before postfix supported 521 as a hangup
action, so yes, it's reasonable to disconnect after any RBL hit during
stress.
I am somewhat hesitant to recommend using 521 as your standard RBL
reject code
* Stephan A. Rickauer stephan.ricka...@startek.ch:
Hi,
i'd like to protect some internal accounts as described at
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html
Currently, I have the following setup:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_pipelining
Quoting LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
On 18-Aug-2009, at 10:42, Noel Jones wrote:
The STRESS_README was written before postfix supported 521 as a
hangup action, so yes, it's reasonable to disconnect after any RBL
hit during stress.
I am somewhat hesitant to recommend using 521 as your
Jeroen van Aart:
That's it until
Aug 15 02:55:06 prod101 postfix/master[9402]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/qmgr pid 9582 exit status 1
I don't think so.
Instead of YOU filtering by hand a long file, let the COMPUTER do
the work for you:
egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):'
Mark Johnson wrote:
Here is the postconf -n
[r...@mail postfix]# postconf -n
This seems fine, mostly using defaults.
Can you please provide a non-verbose, log of a mail transaction you feel
is affected?
Barney had mentioned this too and it is quite important.
Do you have a DNS caching
I spoke too soon
Mark Johnson wrote:
hopcount_limit = 500
This seems a bit unreasonable due to this exists to stop mail loops and
overload.
The default of 50 works in many, many situations.
maximal_queue_lifetime = 5h
Why so short?
This can generate many, many bounces due to
Having built new email gateways, it is time to retire the old ones.
I have removed one email gateway running postfix from the MX records
for our college.
It still has a few hundred mail in the queues and some spam is still coming in.
What is the best way to stop the incoming email and allow the
Original Message
Subject: safe way to retire postfix gateway
From: Robert Lopez rlopez...@gmail.com
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:52:11 PM
Having built new email gateways, it is time to retire the old ones.
I have removed one
This is probably drifting off-topic, but I have a few questions regarding
your setup...
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
85.000 aprox. mail account here (spanish web-hosting company) using:
* 25 FreeBSD 7.x as reception-only mailservers (3500 accounts per server
aprox)
* 3
What about adding this to main.cf?:
inet_interfaces = loopback-only
I believe that that would work as well. Basically, the idea is to cut
off outside access to postfix so that new messages don't get in the
queue. Simultaneously, postfix is attempting to empty the queue as
normal.
Wietse Venema wrote:
I don't think so.
Instead of YOU filtering by hand a long file, let the COMPUTER do
the work for you:
egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /the/log/file | grep qmgr
I read the links provided and that's what I did. I filtered by hand
first and then grepped the logs to
Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
* Hilel New hile...@gmail.com:
I am looking for reading material about sending bulk mail. Tips and
tricks, things to avoid, etc. Can you recommend one?
Use a MLM (like Mailman)
Use VERP
Read
Adrian Dinu a écrit :
Hello,
I have the following problem with my postfix configuration:
[snip]
Aug 18 10:56:20 server postfix/smtpd[17528]: warning: mysql query
failed: Unknown column 'email' in 'where clause'
it said: unknown column. you're asking postfix to use a column that does
not
Jeff Lacki a écrit :
Im having problems with the mail file being produced
when I setup procmail + postfix:
Ive setup global procmail with the following in
my master.cf file:
procmail unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRX user=jeff argv=/usr/bin/procmail -t -o
Jaroslaw Grzabel a écrit :
Hi guys,
I'm wondering is there any way to configure postfix, to check content of
messages which contains ... let say more than 10 recipients, scan those
and check contents in looking for un.sub.scribe link (or particular words)
and if found pass messages if not
Robert Lopez a écrit :
Having built new email gateways, it is time to retire the old ones.
I have removed one email gateway running postfix from the MX records
for our college.
It still has a few hundred mail in the queues and some spam is still coming
in.
What is the best way to stop
42 matches
Mail list logo