Hi,
could you please give me an addvise, whether the following is possible with
postfix? I'd like to manage distribution lists with postfix, so that when a
user sends a message to
li...@mydomain
postfix looks up an alias map in MySQL and sends individual emails to each
alias found in the
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients on the fly.
See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient
We have no way of knowing
I am getting no inbound email after locking down the requirements of
users to authenticate before sending. I dropped back from current
(2.7.*) to 2.6.5.
Not having any success getting tcpdump output. The version I have
differs from the example in the DEBUG instructions.
Complete error
Steve Heaven wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients on the fly.
See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient
We
From:
Clunk Werclick
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Reply-to:
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Cc:
postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject:
Re: relay_domains
vs
virtual_mailbox_domains
Date:
Tue, 08 Sep 2009
09:28:36 +0100
Mailer:
Evolution
Hello postfix users
First Ill say that its about 10 days I read Mailing list history, and I
that I Google around in order to understand Bounce Handling in postfix. (Im
a former Exim user)
Ive found with Google several sites explaining how to set up bounce
handling, but up to now all methods
Hi,
Firstly this is my first post to the list, so apologies if I've not
correctly followed any procedures.
I'm a new user to Postfix (ex Qmail user) and love it. However, there is
one feature of qmqtool that was very useful: qmqtool -i, to list queue
entries by IP address. Is there any way
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 13:27 +0200, no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote:
Hello postfix users
We have approx 150 customers that wish to do marketing email with their
customers, and we have had these customers knowing former spam listing,
because they / we did not cope feedback loops, list retrieval and all
Clunk Werclick wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 13:27 +0200, no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote:
Where am I wrong, and what is necessary to setup bounce handling knowing
that :
1- Bounces return addresses are constructed dynamically, and there is no
real user account corresponding to
[Humour on]Wooow
Thanks a lot, I knew I would have this sort of response, and it helps me and
others certainly a lot...[/humour off]
Clunk Werclick wrote
So they *are* spammers then?
Are they ??? Well in fact no, it's their client database, collected through
vehicles they sold, with
no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote:
My question is how to I manage bounces back in my postfix servers,
knowing that the bounce addresses do not exists as valid users ??? If
you don't have the answer, I don't think community needs your
personal comments on what's good and what's bad...
Create a virtual
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:02 +0200, no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote:
[Humour on]Wooow
{snip}
The answer is you check your logs, write a script to check your logs and
update your databases - or use one of the many mailing list manager
programs that exist. Postfix is simply the MTA. In fact I guess
Hello,
I am trying to figure out if it is possible to mix both shared
domains with UNIX system accounts virtual MAILBOX with separate
domains, non-UNIX accounts at the same time.
The reason for this is quite simple :
I have a mail server with Postfix installed since quite a long time
Hi again,
thanks for the quick reply and sorry for my (outlook's ;) ) bad quoting.
At least i know now what caused the strange bounce message. Since the server
had to be (relatively) hard resetted while sending the newsletter because of
many long blocking processes, i assume this caused some
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 13:30:32 bsd wrote:
Can I mix both type of accounts / config (local with Unix type
virtual) ?
Answer is simply yes.
Just add relevant virtual mailbox settings to main.cf.
Unless it is overly complex, my migration plan would be enable soft_bounce,
add relevant
On 9/8/2009 6:20 AM, Duncan B. wrote:
Hi,
Firstly this is my first post to the list, so apologies if I've not
correctly followed any procedures.
I'm a new user to Postfix (ex Qmail user) and love it. However, there is
one feature of qmqtool that was very useful: qmqtool -i, to list queue
I'm a new user to Postfix (ex Qmail user) and love it. However, there is
one feature of qmqtool that was very useful: qmqtool -i, to list queue
entries by IP address. Is there any way to see which IP addresses in the
postfix queues are the most dominant?
Postfix doesn't store IPs in the queue
Noel Jones:
On 9/8/2009 6:20 AM, Duncan B. wrote:
Hi,
Firstly this is my first post to the list, so apologies if I've not
correctly followed any procedures.
I'm a new user to Postfix (ex Qmail user) and love it. However, there is
one feature of qmqtool that was very useful:
On 9/8/2009 8:48 AM, Duncan B. wrote:
I'm a new user to Postfix (ex Qmail user) and love it. However, there is
one feature of qmqtool that was very useful: qmqtool -i, to list queue
entries by IP address. Is there any way to see which IP addresses in the
postfix queues are the most dominant?
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Indeed, qshape targets outflow. Inflow analysis is easily done
based on logfile records.
Are you able to recommend any methods / tools to extract this information
from the log files, Wietse, or is it just a case of writing a script to do
so?
I
Duncan B.:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Indeed, qshape targets outflow. Inflow analysis is easily done
based on logfile records.
Are you able to recommend any methods / tools to extract this information
from the log files, Wietse, or is it just a case of writing a script
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 02:32:30PM +, Duncan B. wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Indeed, qshape targets outflow. Inflow analysis is easily done
based on logfile records.
Are you able to recommend any methods / tools to extract this information
from the log files, Wietse,
On 9/8/2009 3:07 AM, Paul Beard wrote:
I am getting no inbound email after locking down the requirements of
users to authenticate before sending. I dropped back from current
(2.7.*) to 2.6.5.
Not having any success getting tcpdump output. The version I have
differs from the example in the
Hi,
when a message cannot be delivered, a DSN is generated and returned to sender.
According to [1] I can customize this message throught variable
bounce_template_file, in [2].
The message that is returned to sender has subject Undelivered Mail
Returned to Sender.
But, a notification to admin
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
Looks like the client disconnected.
Test your TLS implementation with
openssl s_client -connect IP:port -starttls smtp
If you get a
250 DSN
or similar message after all the SSL handshake goop, then it worked.
OK,
Duncan B.:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix doesn't store IPs in the queue file, so there is no
such tool for postfix.
Client information records were added late in the Postfix life
cycle, and they are used mainly by for xforward and milters.
However, the
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:20:19AM -0700, paul beard wrote:
Any idea if I should care about this?
Sep 8 08:06:57 shuttle postfix/smtpd[61994]: warning:
network_biopair_interop: error reading 11 bytes from
the network: Connection reset by peer
After you turned-off wrapper mode and
On 9/8/2009 6:27 AM, no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote:
Hello postfix users
First I’ll say that it’s about 10 days I read Mailing list history, and I
that I Google around in order to understand Bounce Handling in postfix. (I’m
a former Exim user)
I’ve found with Google several sites explaining how to
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix doesn't store IPs in the queue file, so there is no
such tool for postfix.
Client information records were added late in the Postfix life
cycle, and they are used mainly by for xforward and milters.
However, the 'qshape' tool will list the
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:37:56AM -0400, Gerard wrote:
I have 'tls' working fine, except for on site. While the mail is still
sent correctly, I am wondering why I have this warning message in the
logs:
There is no warning message.
Sep 8 11:27:02 scorpio postfix/smtp[88433]:
On 9/8/2009 10:20 AM, paul beard wrote:
I don't see an smtpd_recipient_restrictions here. You will need at
least:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
reject_unauth_destination
smtpd_recipient_restrictions was there, as
For those who might need this later, I've finally with the help of
gandi-hosting newsgroup / irc
Found solution to my problems :
1rst thing :
My transport_map was not initialized in main.cf :
To make piping work it's better to set it correctly without any
misspelling...
transport_maps =
All,
How can I add more one recipient? I want both webmaster and postmaster can
receive error email.
The default setting:
bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
delay_notice_recipient = postmaster
error_notice_recipient = postmaster
I know Sendmail can just add next to it = postmaster, webmaster,
At 12:55 PM 9/8/2009, you wrote:
All,
How can I add more one recipient? I want both webmaster and
postmaster can receive error email.
The default setting:
bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
delay_notice_recipient = postmaster
error_notice_recipient = postmaster
I know Sendmail can just add
Hi,
I was recently playing with dovecot plugins, and one of them caught
my attention: zlib. This plugin allows dovecot imap4/pop3 modules to
deal with gzipped messages on Maildir+ boxes ... files are stored in
compressed format and users can normally check them through IMAP4/POP3,
Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit :
Hi,
I was recently playing with dovecot plugins, and one of them caught
my attention: zlib. This plugin allows dovecot imap4/pop3 modules to
deal with gzipped messages on Maildir+ boxes ... files are stored in
compressed format and users can normally
Mark Johnson a écrit :
All,
How can I add more one recipient? I want both webmaster and postmaster can
receive error email.
The default setting:
bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
delay_notice_recipient = postmaster
error_notice_recipient = postmaster
just make it joemaster and have
Thomas Koch a écrit :
Hi,
could you please give me an addvise, whether the following is possible with
postfix? I'd like to manage distribution lists with postfix, so that when a
user sends a message to
li...@mydomain
postfix looks up an alias map in MySQL and sends individual emails
Steve Heaven a écrit :
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients on the fly.
See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient
We
yar mailer got borked?
Clunk Werclick a écrit :
From:
Clunk Werclick
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Reply-to:
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Cc:
postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject:
Re: relay_domains
vs
virtual_mailbox_domains
Date:
Mark Johnson:
All,
How can I add more one recipient? I want both webmaster and postmaster can
receive error email.
The default setting:
bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
delay_notice_recipient = postmaster
error_notice_recipient = postmaster
I know Sendmail can just add next to it
On 9/8/2009 2:59 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I was recently playing with dovecot plugins, and one of them caught my
attention: zlib. This plugin allows dovecot imap4/pop3 modules to deal
with gzipped messages on Maildir+ boxes ... files are stored in
compressed format and users can
mouss wrote:
Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit :
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib
I don't wanna sound negative, but
- since dovecot solves the problem...
- this can also be handled at fielsystem level
- every time I hear zlib, someting like vulnerability hits my ears.
so if I can vote, I'd
On Sep 8, 2009, at 6:16 PM, mouss wrote:
- every time I hear zlib, someting like vulnerability hits my
ears.
Well, you inspired me to finally implement a prevention method against
almost all vulnerabilities there could be in zlib: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/b359aac78f92
I had
44 matches
Mail list logo