Thx for the reply.
While it was intended, no doubt, to be very wrong, it failed. Lacking
a valid CIDR expression, that only matches the single IPv4 address of
0.0.0.0, which, having special meaning in networking, is unroutable.
A setting of equivalent functionality is mynetworks =.
The OP
* richard lucassen mailingli...@lucassen.org:
Hello list,
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
Use an MLM
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Dear all
i've installed a postfix server with mysql support.
i've also set-up a custom filter script shell that calls spamc and
some other custom utils, this script cannot handle multiple
recipients, so i've set
filter_destination_recipient_limit = 1
The problem that i've experienced is that
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:52 PM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
i've installed a postfix server with mysql support.
i've also set-up a custom filter script shell that calls spamc and
some other custom utils, this script cannot handle multiple
recipients, so i've set
Thanks a lot to everyone for suggestions. Couple of questions:
1. I noticed that postfix restarts the appropriate daemons/programs
(smtpd/local) whenever it notices changes in the aliases files. How does it
determine that (based on file's attributes etc.)??
2. Does postfix load the alias
nik600:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:52 PM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
i've installed a postfix server with mysql support.
i've also set-up a custom filter script shell that calls spamc and
some other custom utils, this script cannot handle multiple
recipients, so i've set
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:00:32PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall k...@rice.edu wrote:
[mlm]
I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
nik600:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:52 PM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
i've installed a postfix server with mysql support.
i've also set-up a custom filter script shell that calls spamc and
some other
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:01:00 +
Gaby Vanhegan g...@vanhegan.net replied:
I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web
interface like mailman and works great with Postfix.
Personally, I have used DADA Mail in the past. It is written in Perl
and has a web interface for most
On 4 Jan 2010, at 14:53, Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have used DADA Mail in the past. It is written in Perl
and has a web interface for most common configuration settings.
Obviously, it can be configured manually. In fact, some settings are
not exposed in the web interface. Plus, it works
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:41:18PM +1300, Michael wrote:
I have not been able to get any message other then Client did not present a
certificate in message headers despite loading a Commodo email certificate
in to Kmail.
What problem are you trying to solve? Does the Kmail client support
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:01:00 +
Gaby Vanhegan g...@vanhegan.net wrote:
I will chime in with a recommendation for mailman. It is easy to
setup and run.
I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web
interface like mailman and works great with Postfix.
Thnx to
Hello,
I previously posted this thread, but changed midstream and was given
guidance as to the proper way to post. So, I am starting again.
Summary: I would like to ban an address/domain from posting to my system. I
am using header_checks to do that. After creating a header_checks file and
* Christopher Adams adam...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I previously posted this thread, but changed midstream and was given
guidance as to the proper way to post. So, I am starting again.
Summary: I would like to ban an address/domain from posting to my system. I
am using header_checks to do that.
We are currently in need of a seasoned Postfix professional that can
manage a large Postfix, Procmail, Spamassassin, ClamAV, Linux
environment located in Central New Jersey.
Anyone interested please contact me off list.
After previously posting a thread about header_checks, someone suggested
using check_sender_access, I tried it and posted a follow up and was
admonished for changing direction. I specifically asked how to proceed and
was told to go back to my original thread, which was header_checks.
Message
* Christopher Adams adam...@gmail.com:
After previously posting a thread about header_checks, someone suggested
using check_sender_access, I tried it and posted a follow up and was
admonished for changing direction. I specifically asked how to proceed and
was told to go back to my original
On 4 Jan 2010, at 19:23, richard lucassen wrote:
Thnx to everyone. I think mailman and mlmmj are good suggestions. I'll
examine all of these and I'll choose the one that fits best to this
rather particular purpose.
Mailman is a python app, mlmmj is a native C app that works through a local
Steve a écrit :
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:37:18 +0100
Von: mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net
An: postfix users list postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
Roman Gelfand a écrit :
I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight,
nik600 a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:52 PM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
i've installed a postfix server with mysql support.
i've also set-up a custom filter script shell that calls spamc and
some other custom utils, this script cannot handle multiple
recipients, so i've
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:20:04 +0100
Von: mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
Steve a écrit :
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:37:18 +0100
Von: mouss
Well, it looks like, perhaps, I found the missing link. After adding
s25r rules and HELO response verification in main.cf, no spam has
siped through.
I think that mostly it was HELO response verification that did it.
BTW, is there a reason not block emails with incorrect HELO response?
Thanks
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:40:29 -0500
Von: Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com
An: Steve stev...@gmx.net
CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
Well, it looks like, perhaps, I found the missing link. After adding
s25r rules
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:40:29PM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
Well, it looks like, perhaps, I found the missing link. After adding
s25r rules and HELO response verification in main.cf, no spam has
siped through.
I think that mostly it was HELO response verification that did it.
BTW, is
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:45:21 -0600
Von: Kenneth Marshall k...@rice.edu
An: Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com
CC: Steve stev...@gmx.net, postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:40:29PM -0500, Roman
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:47:11 +0100
Von: Steve stev...@gmx.net
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:45:21 -0600
Von: Kenneth Marshall k...@rice.edu
An:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:08:39 -0500
Von: Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com
An: Steve stev...@gmx.net
CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Steve stev...@gmx.net wrote:
On Jan 4, 2010, at 16:08, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
would have expected you to
say, a MTA which ignores basic basic configuration rules doesn't
deserve that it's mail should be accepted. In fact, this is the way I
feel about this.
Seconded.
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010, Steve wrote:
I think that mostly it was HELO response verification that did it.
BTW, is there a reason not block emails with incorrect HELO response?
None really, unless you need to accept mail from misconfigured
servers. (We do.)
Most of do (I would
29 matches
Mail list logo
