[third resend to fill in Victor's reference - removed him from Cc: to
avoid the dupe;
all in the hopes it finally makes it or I get at least an NDN]
Am 17.05.2010, 19:19 Uhr, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:23:16AM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
On 17.05.2010 03:02, Victor
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 18:14, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
As far as I know, it was never standardised.
Good enough reason for me to not use it.
I get mine from IANA and 465 is assigned differently.
what OS do you run? if smtps != 465 on your system, then the default
master.cf doesn't
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:48, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
0.0.0.25 is not a valid IPv4 address.
It is a valid way to express the last 32 bits of any IPv6 address. It
only needs to be a valid IPv4 address if the previous 96 bits are
:: (or one other case I don't reacall that
I'd like to do something like this. I have a domain, let's call
example.com. This domain has a set of users. I want to have email
accepted for any user in any hostname that is a part of this domain.
And, regardless of which hostname in this domain was involved, if the
user doesn't exist, the
Phil Howard:
I'd like to do something like this. I have a domain, let's call
example.com. This domain has a set of users. I want to have email
accepted for any user in any hostname that is a part of this domain.
And, regardless of which hostname in this domain was involved, if the
user
Hi
I have some of my aliases that are failing
with the following error
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail-px0-f171.google.com[209.85.212.171]:
450 4.1.1 linuxi...@example.co.za: Recipient address rejected:
unverified address: unknown user: linuxinfo;
from=exam...@gmail.com to=linuxi...@example.co.za
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:36, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Postfix supports wildcards via regexp/pcre tables.
1) You can use them for all the tables that define Postfix address
classes: mydestination + aliases, virtual_alias_domains +
virtual_alias_maps,
On 5/25/2010 9:36 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi
I have some of my aliases that are failing
with the following error
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail-px0-f171.google.com[209.85.212.171]:
450 4.1.1linuxi...@example.co.za: Recipient address rejected:
unverified address: unknown user: linuxinfo;
On 5/25/2010 10:23 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:36, Wietse Venemawie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Postfix supports wildcards via regexp/pcre tables.
1) You can use them for all the tables that define Postfix address
classes: mydestination + aliases,
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:09:09AM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 18:14, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
As far as I know, it was never standardised.
Good enough reason for me to not use it.
This is the de-facto standard port for the service. Shoot yourself in
the foot
Phil Howard:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:36, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Postfix supports wildcards via regexp/pcre tables.
?1) You can use them for all the tables that define Postfix address
? ?classes: mydestination + aliases, virtual_alias_domains +
?
In this example, the user really does not exist. Postfix does not
produce an error message when u...@example.com exists.
Wietse
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5144 (20100525) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http
On May 25, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Zachary Burns wrote:
Can you also do something like *...@*.ru and *...@*.tw (bounce all mail from
russian, tiawan spammers, etc)
I have:
ru REJECT *.ru rejected by sender_checks
.ru REJECT *.ru rejected by sender_checks
in my sender checks. I think there was
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:09:09AM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 18:14, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
As far as I know, it was never standardised.
Good enough reason for me to not use it.
This is the de-facto standard port for the service.
On 2010-05-25 Glenn English wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Zachary Burns wrote:
Can you also do something like *...@*.ru and *...@*.tw (bounce all mail
from russian, tiawan spammers, etc)
I have:
ru REJECT *.ru rejected by sender_checks
.ru REJECT *.ru rejected by sender_checks
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:37, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:36, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Postfix supports wildcards via regexp/pcre tables.
?1) You can use them for all the tables that define Postfix address
?
Phil Howard:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:37, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:36, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Postfix supports wildcards via regexp/pcre tables.
?1) You can use them for all the tables that define Postfix
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 13:41, Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:09:09AM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 18:14, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
As far as I know, it was never standardised.
Good enough reason for me
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 15:59, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
You need one table entry per user somewhere, otherwise you can't
reject mail for users that don't exist.
Absolutely, of course. But having one entry for every pairing of user
AND hostname isn't possible (because an
Phil Howard:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 15:59, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
You need one table entry per user somewhere, otherwise you can't
reject mail for users that don't exist.
Absolutely, of course. But having one entry for every pairing of user
AND hostname isn't
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 17:10, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 15:59, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
You need one table entry per user somewhere, otherwise you can't
reject mail for users that don't exist.
Absolutely, of course.
Phil Howard a écrit :
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 18:14, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
As far as I know, it was never standardised.
Good enough reason for me to not use it.
if you don't need it, then you don't need it:)
- if you have customers with old outlook, then you'd better offer
22 matches
Mail list logo
