Having a cover-all SPF record doesnot mean the domain is spamming.
You missed this:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/current/0126.html
D.
* Jorge Armando Medina jmed...@e-compugraf.com:
On 07/07/2010 01:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
When mail arrives to the mail server,
I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
a footer in the
Theodore Durst:
* enabling TLS results in postfix failing to load. By process of eliminati
-on, it is pretty clear that smtpd_tls_security_level = may is the culpri
-t. Any value aside from no causes a failure to start.
What is hte complete error message?
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see
Zitat von Theodore Durst tdu...@durstmedia.com:
Anyone out there been able to configure postfix with TLS certificate
support on AIX?
I am trying to get postfix running on a RS/6000 running AIX 5.3.0.0.
Postfix is working, it sends mail, which is all we want this server
to do (it will
On 2010-07-07 11:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jerry put forth on 7/7/2010 8:09 AM:
Why are you setting configuration parameters to their default setting?
It doesn't serve any purpose that I am aware of.
I've seen this quite a bit. It leads me to believe there are some Linux
distros that
On 07/07/2010 08:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
postfix properly.
Name it.
Okay, I may have been baiting a bit there.
The obvious inference
Hi There,First post to postfix mailing list, be
nice... ;)Postfix 2.6.6.2zWe have a hosted mail platform
with 100's of companies, some companies require our MTA to talk to a
smarthost for their domain with authentication.As per
SASL_READMEThe above can be achieved with something like this
Dr. Venema,
Looking more closely, I had not specified a value for smtpd_sasl_path. Doing so
seems to have resolved the issue.
For the record, the error had been:
# postfix start
/usr/libexec/postfix/post-install: Error: no smtpd_tls_security_level =
encrypt should be no or an absolute path
* Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
Why did you bother responding if you have such a narrow view that you
cannot see it? Do you actually like to show off how arrogant you can
be?
There was, simply, no postfix-specific question in your post
Agreed.
I could replace every mention of
On 7/8/2010 8:24 AM, David Jacobson wrote:
Hi There,
First post to postfix mailing list, be nice... ;)
Postfix 2.6.6.2z
We have a hosted mail platform with 100's of companies, some
companies require our MTA to talk to a smarthost for their
domain with authentication.
As per SASL_README
The
Hi,
i have disable local delivery follow the document instruction, then i enable
2 user in the virtual file but not able to send to these users.
Jul 8 22:57:07 smtp2 postfix/error[9618]: 3E7C82BE8004: to=
postmas...@xxx.xxx.com, orig_to=postmaster, relay=none, delay=0.01,
delays=0/0/0/0,
Hi all,
to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota
availability for incoming messages.
I read http://www.postfix.org/tcp_table.5.html over and over again, but still
I am getting messages like
Jul 8 17:46:24 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[3325]: warning: read TCP map reply
Hello,
First of all, thanks mouss for the reply.
I have made few steps forward in my hub and spoke setup.
I set up the hub which is forwarding mail to the agencies' server based on a
MySQL table.
The problem is located on agencies' servers. As I first said, I have only 1
domain.
When I want
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 08:30, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
Okay, I may have been baiting a bit there.
The obvious inference is that you need to know your distro in order to be
able to do anything useful with it.
If that causes issues, that distribution's support is your first port
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt m...@mareichelt.com wrote:
ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro
shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask
slackware specific questions on a slackware mailinglist/usenet group,
and post postfix
Phil Howard wrote (on Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:10:39PM -0400):
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reichelt m...@mareichelt.com wrote:
ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro
shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask
slackware specific
On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Hi all,
to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota
availability for incoming messages.
I readhttp://www.postfix.org/tcp_table.5.html over and over again, but still
I am getting messages like
Jul 8 17:46:24 s15277780
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:15, N. Yaakov Ziskind aw...@ziskind.us wrote:
(I've installed PF on half a dozen Ubuntu boxes, with no hiccups
significant enough to remember.)
What I would say is that the differences between distros only involve
setup and maybe maintenance, and do not involve
Am 08.07.2010 um 18:23 schrieb Noel Jones:
On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Hi all,
to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota
availability for incoming messages.
I readhttp://www.postfix.org/tcp_table.5.html over and over again, but
still I am
Am 08.07.2010 um 19:02 schrieb Philipp Leusmann:
Am 08.07.2010 um 18:23 schrieb Noel Jones:
On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Hi all,
to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota
availability for incoming messages.
I
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 13:13, Philipp Leusmann
philipp.leusm...@rwth-aachen.de wrote:
But I still get the odd
warning: read TCP map reply from localhost:1337: unexpected EOF (Success)
log entry. Is there missing anything?
I gather from the documentation the connection is maintained for more
On 7/8/2010 12:13 PM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Am 08.07.2010 um 19:02 schrieb Philipp Leusmann:
Am 08.07.2010 um 18:23 schrieb Noel Jones:
On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Hi all,
to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table server which checks quota
availability for incoming
* Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com wrote:
A single user scares you? Good heavens.
So what was my question specific to, if not Postfix? It certainly
was not specific to any distro. Postfix was the common element.
You are looking for the silver bullet in times when there's only a
golden child.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 15:04, markus reichelt m...@mareichelt.com wrote:
* Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com wrote:
A single user scares you? Good heavens.
So what was my question specific to, if not Postfix? It certainly
was not specific to any distro. Postfix was the common element.
You
Phil Howard wrote:
I wanted to get input on it. I'm still on the fence about making that
change at work. The kind of input I was hoping was something that
indicated general ease of setup from an administrative perspective.
If the feedback with Ubuntu is that it works fine, then I'd consider
On 07/06/2010 01:10 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
So you have multiple exit points with non-uniform latency, but the more
severe congestion is downstream, so you want to load the exit points
uniformly. Yes, the solution is to disable the connection cache, and
set reasonably low connection and
On 07/08/2010 06:10 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40, markus reicheltm...@mareichelt.com wrote:
ALso, I can only stress what has been said already: get your distro
shit together; go along with your hunch about slackware, ask
slackware specific questions on a slackware
On 07/08/2010 05:42 PM, Teh Kim Chooi wrote:
Hi,
i have disable local delivery follow the document instruction, then i
enable 2 user in the virtual file but not able to send to these users.
Jul 8 22:57:07 smtp2 postfix/error[9618]: 3E7C82BE8004:
to=postmas...@xxx.xxx.com
Hello everybody,
I'm revisiting this issue after a break - about a year - and now I'm
trying to get to the bottom of this. I found a thread from five years
back (http://bit.ly/bIFigX) that discusses a similar issue, but my
situation is somewhat different.
I'm attempting to create a configuration
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps may be what I'm looking for..
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps works except that the other settings
affecting the relay aren't conditionalized by the defined relayhost
maps. In this case the relayhost for the externally relayed
business domains requires TLS and authentication while the relay for
the local domain (being the
Ville Walveranta put forth on 7/8/2010 9:14 PM:
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps works except that the other settings
affecting the relay aren't conditionalized by the defined relayhost
maps. In this case the relayhost for the externally relayed
business domains requires TLS and authentication
Yes, i know i disable the local delivery agent, but i still wish to have
root local delivery to be enable. I follow the document instruction never
mention need to add virtual_mailbox_maps. I just try the
virtual_mailbox_maps with r...@localhost, but i still get (local mail
delivery is disabled),
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Something tells me you'll answer your own question before we get a chance to.
;)
;-)
I think I've now hit a wall with a singular configuration. I'll
proceed with setting up a second instance unless someone has a
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 01:37:08PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
On 07/06/2010 01:10 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
So you have multiple exit points with non-uniform latency, but the more
severe congestion is downstream, so you want to load the exit points
uniformly. Yes, the solution is to
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:17:28PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ville Walveranta put forth on 7/8/2010 9:14 PM:
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps works except that the other settings
affecting the relay aren't conditionalized by the defined relayhost
maps. In this case the relayhost for the
36 matches
Mail list logo
