On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
TLS security levels are configurable per nexthop destination
as documented. SASL logins are also specified via the table of
per-destination user:password pairs. It is not clear what's missing.
I'll read
From: "Noel Jones"
njo...@megan.vbhcs.orgTo:
postfix-users@postfix.orgSent: Thursday, July 8, 2010
5:04:07 PMSubject: Re: SASL Authentication per recipient
domainOn 7/8/2010 8:24 AM, David Jacobson wrote: Hi
There, First post to postfix mailing list, be nice...
;) Postfix 2.6.6.2z We have a hosted
Hi folks,
we're having some trouble with greylisting (postgrey) and smtp auth.
smtp_recipient_restrictions looks like:
permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination, warn_if_reject,
* Hendrik Pahl p...@team-datentechnik.de:
Hi folks,
we're having some trouble with greylisting (postgrey) and smtp auth.
smtp_recipient_restrictions looks like:
It's smtpd_recipient_restrictions
permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks,
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:36:56 +0200 (SAST)
David Jacobson dav...@synaq.com articulated:
From: Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 5:04:07 PM
Subject: Re: SASL Authentication per recipient domain
On 7/8/2010 8:24 AM, David Jacobson
From: "Jerry"
postfix-u...@seibercom.netTo:
postfix-users@postfix.orgSent: Friday, July 9, 2010
11:40:11 AMSubject: Re: SASL Authentication per recipient
domainOn Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:36:56 +0200 (SAST)David Jacobson
dav...@synaq.com articulated: From: "Noel Jones"
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org To:
hello there,
i'm running a postfix 2.4.6 on a opensuse box.
postfix has amawis-new with spamassasin installed ...
since a few weeks one of my email accounts gets bombarded with thousands
of SPAM mailer daemon error bounces.
could not deliver message ... bla bla bla ...
it's getting really
Am 09.07.2010 12:35, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello there,
i'm running a postfix 2.4.6 on a opensuse box.
postfix has amawis-new with spamassasin installed ...
since a few weeks one of my email accounts gets bombarded with thousands
of SPAM mailer daemon error bounces.
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the error bounces ...
the bounces are sent from hundred of different IP addresses ...
any more idea?
thanks for your help fun
becki
below some logs you requested ... change the real
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Administrator
Beckspaced.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:52 PM
To: Robert Schetterer
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: email account bombarded with SPAM error bounces - what to
do?
hello
In an older episode (Friday, 9. July 2010), Kammen van, Marco, Springer
SBM NL wrote:
But there is a big spam/virus attack going on, where messages look
like NDR's but they aren't.
Various big anti spam vendors are having serious issues stopping
this.
Could you provide a URL where more
Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the error bounces ...
the bounces are sent from hundred of different IP addresses ...
any more idea?
thanks for your
Am 09.07.2010 13:00, schrieb Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL:
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Administrator
Beckspaced.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:52 PM
To: Robert Schetterer
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re:
On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the error bounces ...
the bounces are sent from hundred of different IP addresses
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of wolfgang
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:11 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: email account bombarded with SPAM error bounces - what to
do?
In an older episode (Friday,
Am 08.07.2010 um 20:55 schrieb Noel Jones:
On 7/8/2010 12:13 PM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Am 08.07.2010 um 19:02 schrieb Philipp Leusmann:
Am 08.07.2010 um 18:23 schrieb Noel Jones:
On 7/8/2010 10:58 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Hi all,
to stop backscattering I wrote a tcp_table
Hi,
My ISP (ovh) is complaining about my postfix servers doing wrong ARP
demand, do you have any idea of what can cause this in my postfix
configuration ?
188.165.55.92 : is one of the server ip (ip failover)
Thu Jul 8 02:03:32 2010 : arp who-has 169.254.140.241 tell 188.165.55.92
Thu Jul 8
Am 09.07.2010 13:35, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the error
bounces
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:20:12 +0200, David Jacobson wrote:
I appreciate your response, however if you read my original message
you will notice that we have had a look at all support
smtp_sasl_password_maps options and it only allows for the following
scenario according to the docs:
1)
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:35 +0200, Administrator Beckspaced.com wrote:
On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the same IP or host sending the
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:47:40PM +0200, St?phane MERLE wrote:
Hi,
My ISP (ovh) is complaining about my postfix servers doing wrong ARP
demand, do you have any idea of what can cause this in my postfix
configuration ?
188.165.55.92 : is one of the server ip (ip failover)
Thu Jul 8
Hi,
I have a problem between one of my postfix and a zimbra server (postfix
server).
sometime (one mail every three days), I got this error :
502 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized (in reply to RCPT TO command)
I did a tcpdump to understand why I got this error and I found that one of
* Thomas POINDESSOUS poindessous...@foncia.fr:
Hi,
I have a problem between one of my postfix and a zimbra server (postfix
server).
sometime (one mail every three days), I got this error :
502 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized (in reply to RCPT TO command)
I did a
Hi Wietse,
what kind auf verbose logging are you talking about? postmap -vv -q ? Or a
more verbose logging for tcp_table in mail.log ? How could I turn this on?
Philipp
Am 09.07.2010 um 15:45 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Philipp Leusmann:
warning: restriction `User' after `defer' is ignored
From: "Sahil Tandon"
sa...@freebsd.orgTo:
postfix-users@postfix.orgSent: Friday, July 9, 2010 2:03:23
PMSubject: Re: SASL Authentication per recipient
domainOn Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:20:12 +0200, David Jacobson
wrote: I appreciate your response, however if you read my
original message you will
Thomas POINDESSOUS:
Hi,
I have a problem between one of my postfix and a zimbra server (postfix
server).
sometime (one mail every three days), I got this error :
502 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized (in reply to RCPT TO command)
I did a tcpdump to understand why I got this
Yes, I think this is a cisco asa 5550, with a special filter which protects
smtp server.
Do you think I should ask to disable it ?
Thanks.
Le 9 juil. 2010 à 15:46, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de a écrit
:
* Thomas POINDESSOUS poindessous...@foncia.fr:
Hi,
I have a
Philipp Leusmann:
warning: restriction `User' after `defer' is ignored
when I return something like
200 DEFER User is over quota
I guess there is some special string expected after DEFER ?
Wietse:
No. When the first word is defer or DEFER etc., then the rest
of the text sent to the
* poindessous...@foncia.fr poindessous...@foncia.fr:
Yes, I think this is a cisco asa 5550, with a special filter which protects
smtp server.
Do you think I should ask to disable it ?
Yes. It causes nothing but grief :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 03:58:12PM +0200, poindessous...@foncia.fr wrote:
... a special filter which protects smtp server.
Do you think I should ask to disable it ?
Yes, always. The SMTP inspection feature notoriously does more harm than good.
--
Viktor.
From: "David Jacobson"
dav...@synaq.comTo:
postfix-users@postfix.orgSent: Friday, July 9, 2010 3:54:16
PMSubject: Re: SASL Authentication per recipient
domainFrom: "Sahil Tandon"
sa...@freebsd.orgTo:
postfix-users@postfix.orgSent: Friday, July 9, 2010 2:03:23
PMSubject: Re: SASL Authentication per
Am 09.07.2010 um 16:02 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Philipp Leusmann:
warning: restriction `User' after `defer' is ignored
when I return something like
200 DEFER User is over quota
I guess there is some special string expected after DEFER ?
Wietse:
No. When the first word is defer or
On 7/9/2010 14:40, Ram wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:35 +0200, Administrator Beckspaced.com wrote:
On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
actually it is not always the
Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL put forth on 7/9/2010 6:00 AM:
Not sure if its related to your issue.
But there is a big spam/virus attack going on, where messages look like
NDR's but they aren't.
Various big anti spam vendors are having serious issues stopping this.
Some of my trap
Am 09.07.2010 16:13, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
On 7/9/2010 14:40, Ram wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:35 +0200, Administrator Beckspaced.com wrote:
On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
hello robert,
thanks
On 7/9/2010 6:46 AM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Am 08.07.2010 um 20:55 schrieb Noel Jones:
On 7/8/2010 12:13 PM, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
thanks for your advice. This really should be pointed out more explicitly in
the documentation.
As for 500, would it be a good practice to return 500, if
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:13:28PM +0200, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Jul 9 16:07:00 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[18815]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from c-68-57-126-48.hsd1.va.comcast.net[68.57.126.48]:
450 4.3.2 silvi...@xxx.de: Recipient address rejected:
Try again later;
Hi,
I would have 2 questions :
- 1 what is the procedure for postfix when it try to send email to
a domain with no MX record ?
like : dig mx elv.enic.fr
- 2 would that be an offense to refuse to send to domain with no MX
record ? (I don't know if there's a lot of them)
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 06:09:26PM +0200, St?phane MERLE wrote:
Hi,
I would have 2 questions :
- 1 what is the procedure for postfix when it try to send email to a
domain with no MX record ?
like : dig mx elv.enic.fr
Per 20+ year old SMTP standards it sends to the A
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:12:41PM +0200, David Jacobson wrote:
We tried PCRE matches to no avail. Based on your request we tried to change
sasl_passwd lookup from hash to pcre (I'm no postfix guy, so have no idea if
this should work or not, but postfix restart didn't complain)
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:09, Stéphane MERLE
stephane.me...@distrigame.com wrote:
I would have 2 questions :
- 1 what is the procedure for postfix when it try to send email to a
domain with no MX record ?
like : dig mx elv.enic.fr
- 2 would that be an offense to refuse to
Philipp Leusmann:
I need to see ONE example of verbose logging that shows
(
tcp_table returning the string that is giving the above error,
AND
the Postfix SMTP server processing that result
).
Sorry, I still don't get, what you mean.
I need to see VERBOSE LOGGING
Am 09.07.2010 um 17:39 schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:13:28PM +0200, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Jul 9 16:07:00 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[18815]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from c-68-57-126-48.hsd1.va.comcast.net[68.57.126.48]:
450 4.3.2 silvi...@xxx.de: Recipient
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 07:25:45PM +0200, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Jul 9 19:15:25 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[22232]: dict_tcp_lookup: send: get
be...@xxx.de
Jul 9 19:15:25 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[22232]: dict_tcp_lookup: recv: 200
DEFER%20User%20over%20quota
Jul 9 19:15:25 s15277780
On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:57 AM, Hendrik Pahl wrote:
Hi folks,
we're having some trouble with greylisting (postgrey) and smtp auth.
smtp_recipient_restrictions looks like:
I'm not sure what the rest of your network looks like but I greylist through
openbsd's spamd and to sasl authenticated
On 7/9/2010 11:35 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:09, Stéphane MERLE
stephane.me...@distrigame.com wrote:
I would have 2 questions :
- 1 what is the procedure for postfix when it try to send email to a
domain with no MX record ?
like : dig mx elv.enic.fr
Am 09.07.2010 um 19:46 schrieb Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 07:25:45PM +0200, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Jul 9 19:15:25 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[22232]: dict_tcp_lookup: send: get
be...@xxx.de
Jul 9 19:15:25 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[22232]: dict_tcp_lookup: recv: 200
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 07:25:45PM +0200, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
Jul 9 19:15:25 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[22232]: dict_tcp_lookup: send: get
be...@xxx.de
Jul 9 19:15:25 s15277780 postfix/smtpd[22232]: dict_tcp_lookup: recv: 200
DEFER%20User%20over%20quota
Jul 9
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 08:56:38PM +0200, Philipp Leusmann wrote:
It would be nice, if somebody else, also running a Debian Lenny (it's lenny,
not etch) system could verify this behavior.
Anybody here?
I will also reinstall postfix and try again.
If it is compiled with debugging
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:04:59PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Either your Postfix source is modified, miscompiled, the binaries are
corrupted, or CPU is mal-functioning.
Or he is running a Postfix version before 2.6.
Citing the access(5) manpage:
DEFER optional text...
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:04:59PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Either your Postfix source is modified, miscompiled, the binaries are
corrupted, or CPU is mal-functioning.
Or he is running a Postfix version before 2.6.
Citing the access(5) manpage:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:12:41 +0200, David Jacobson wrote:
[ .. ]
It just seems like SASL doesn't support PCRE.
The statement does not make sense.
Just for the sake of clarification we've found what we're looking for,
PCRE was not required.
PCRE is not *required*, but it would be fine
Resolved!
Another concurrent thread SASL Authentication per recipient domain
gave additional clues.
I ended up using a PCRE map for sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
(domain names changed to protect the innocent and to better illustrate
what was done):
main.cf:
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
Hi all,
does Postfix Supports additional parameters to the SMTP MAIL and RCPT
commands as mentioned in RFC 2821 and others?
RCPT TO:forward-path [ SP rcpt-parameters ] CRLF
i have tried to use something like as follows in the sender Postfix Server
RCPT TO:x...@yyy.com SP one=randomtext
On Friday, July 9, 2010, 17:42:37, Sufian Hameed wrote:
does Postfix Supports additional parameters to the SMTP MAIL and RCPT
commands as mentioned in RFC 2821 and others?
RCPT TO:forward-path [ SP rcpt-parameters ] CRLF
i have tried to use something like as follows in the sender Postfix
Hi,
I am thinking about trying to replicate a feature I custom-built for my
Sendmail installation, in Postfix. What this does is, whenever a host I am
backup for is mentioned in the SMTP RCPT command, I check to see if the host is
up, and *refuse* the command (450) if it is. The consequence
On Friday, July 9, 2010, 18:57:10, Rod Dorman wrote:
On Friday, July 9, 2010, 17:42:37, Sufian Hameed wrote:
does Postfix Supports additional parameters to the SMTP MAIL and RCPT
commands as mentioned in RFC 2821 and others?
RCPT TO:forward-path [ SP rcpt-parameters ] CRLF
i have tried to
Hi,
can you please elaborate? what is wrong?
RCPT TO:forward-path [ SP rcpt-parameters ] CRLF is the syntax
mentioned in RFC 2821.
regards
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Rod Dorman r...@polylogics.com wrote:
On Friday, July 9, 2010, 18:57:10, Rod Dorman wrote:
On Friday, July 9, 2010,
On 10 Jul 2010, at 00:10, Sufian Hameed wrote:
can you please elaborate? what is wrong?
RCPT TO:forward-path [ SP rcpt-parameters ] CRLF is the syntax
mentioned in RFC 2821.
1. SP is part of the ABNF grammar in the formal specification of the syntax
of the command. It means a space
Sabahattin Gucukoglu:
Hi,
I am thinking about trying to replicate a feature I custom-built for my Se
-ndmail installation, in Postfix. What this does is, whenever a host I am ba
-ckup for is mentioned in the SMTP RCPT command, I check to see if the host i
-s up, and *refuse* the command (450)
Am 09.07.2010 um 22:37 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:04:59PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Either your Postfix source is modified, miscompiled, the binaries are
corrupted, or CPU is mal-functioning.
Or he is running a Postfix version before 2.6.
61 matches
Mail list logo
