Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Henrik K h...@hege.li: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: I will say generically that for an OP who has the time, avoiding content filters and using SMTP time blocking methods is probably more effective in the long run and makes more efficient use of

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Patrick Proniewski
On 16 juil. 2010, at 09:27, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: In Germany many companies have given up on content filtering because it is not allowed to drop mail after accepting, if there is a chance that private mail *could* be involved. So with content filter your only choice would be to tag

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Henrik K h...@hege.li: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: I will say generically that for an OP who has the time, avoiding content filters and using SMTP time blocking methods is probably more effective

Best Practise

2010-07-16 Thread Jonathan Tripathy
Hi Everyone, I have set up a mail server (on a VM) as per this article: http://workaround.org/ispmail/lenny I wish to host this server for a customer. However, I don't think it's best practise to simply place the whole VM in a DMZ and port forward to it. My question is, what should I do

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org: Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Henrik K h...@hege.li: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: I will say generically that for an OP who has the time, avoiding content filters and using

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org: Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Henrik K h...@hege.li: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: I will say generically that for an OP who

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org: Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org: Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Henrik K h...@hege.li: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan

Rewrite non FQDN Domains

2010-07-16 Thread Körner , Uwe
Hi all i've been looking for a solution to rewrite a non FQDN to a valid domain with postfix. my users are writing mails to +123...@sms and it should be rewriten to +123...@sms.provider.tld. Any ideas? uwe

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Steve
Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:03:27 +0200 Von: Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Robert Schetterer

Re: Rewrite non FQDN Domains

2010-07-16 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Körner, Uwe uwe.koer...@t-systems.ch: Hi all i've been looking for a solution to rewrite a non FQDN to a valid domain with postfix. my users are writing mails to +123...@sms and it should be rewriten to +123...@sms.provider.tld. append_dot_mydomain = yes mydomain = provider.tld which is

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 16.07.2010 13:10, schrieb Steve: Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:03:27 +0200 Von: Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Mikael Bak
Steve wrote: [big snip] So you have made your point. You prefer (or are required) to have user in control. Yes. The big problem is that no solution out there is 100% accurate for all users. So the only way to make the user happy is to delegate the control to him. Can't speek for all

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:55:17PM +0200, Mikael Bak wrote: Steve wrote: [big snip] So you have made your point. You prefer (or are required) to have user in control. Yes. The big problem is that no solution out there is 100% accurate for all users. So the only way to make the user

Re: Different disclaimaer for each domain???

2010-07-16 Thread Adrian P. van Bloois
* El Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:35:07PM +0200, escribiste: * Adrian P. van Bloois adr...@accu.uu.nl: Hi, Can I automagically attach a different disclaimer for each domain? if so, how? Are there different options? Which program is appending the single disclaimer now? None at al. :-) --

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Steve
Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:55:17 +0200 Von: Mikael Bak mik...@t-online.hu An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix Steve wrote: [big snip] So you have made your point. You prefer (or are required) to have user in

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Steve
Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:09:54 -0500 Von: Kenneth Marshall k...@rice.edu An: Mikael Bak mik...@t-online.hu CC: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:55:17PM +0200, Mikael Bak wrote: Steve

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:06:11PM +0200, Steve wrote: Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:09:54 -0500 Von: Kenneth Marshall k...@rice.edu An: Mikael Bak mik...@t-online.hu CC: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix On

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

2010-07-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Steve: Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:44:23 -0400 Von: Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix Steve, I request that you end this thread. Wietse

Postfix barfing on dovecot LDA transport

2010-07-16 Thread Corey Chandler
I've been running dovecot + postfix with a MySQL backend for a while now, and been happy with it. Now that I want to implement Sieve filtering, I discovered that I'm using postfix's virtual transport instead of Dovecot's LDA. Adding virtual_transport = dovecot to the main.cf file and dovecot

Re: Postfix barfing on dovecot LDA transport

2010-07-16 Thread Corey Chandler
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 03:28:07PM -0700, Corey Chandler wrote: I've been running dovecot + postfix with a MySQL backend for a while now, and been happy with it. Now that I want to implement Sieve filtering, I discovered that I'm using postfix's virtual transport instead of Dovecot's LDA.

Re: Postfix barfing on dovecot LDA transport

2010-07-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Corey Chandler: Jul 16 14:52:13 Leavenworth postfix/pipe[31344]: fatal: user= command-line attribute specifies mail system vmail group id 1008 As the error message says, you MUST NOT run non-Postfix programs with Postfix user or group privileges. Wietse