On 07/22/2010 05:22 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:16:04PM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote:
Can you try what happens if you replace at
typedef struct LOCAL_STATE {
int level;/* nesting level, for logging */
DELIVER_ATTR msg_attr;/*
Bas,
why should that make a difference if it was already proven that
changing the optimization level of the compiler fixes the issue, and
that it is probably a special corner case of hardened gcc3.4? I
suppose it has to do with it's stack protecting techniques etc.
2010/7/22 Bas Mevissen
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Wietse Venema put forth on 7/21/2010 2:22 PM:
Ram:
One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
the mails to other servers.
Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I think it is will
be good to mount
Hi,
I've got a local mail server that is responsible for delivering all my
mail to the recipients. It does this by forwarding it to the strato
mailserver using smtp authentication. As I do have accounts with
different providers, my mails do have different sender domains. That's
why the strato
Hi,
[rewrite sender envelope address only]
I just got it working using canonical mapping and canonical_classes.
Regards,
M. Braun
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I can put a mail on HOLD and release it later with the postsuper command.
That's great for debugging purposes, but only if I need to send the message
just once.
Would it be possible to expand the postsuper command with an optional command
line parameter that releases the message, but does not
Patrick Ben Koetter put forth on 7/22/2010 2:11 AM:
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Wietse Venema put forth on 7/21/2010 2:22 PM:
Ram:
One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
the mails to other servers.
Since there is almost no mail queued on the
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 12:54 +0200, Denis BUCHER wrote:
4. But now when I try a telnet (this machine) 25 from 213.213.213.213
I get Welcome and I am not rejected ?
Could someone tell me what I did wrong ?
Check http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#timing which tells
you _when_ your
Le 22.07.2010 12:58, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit :
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 12:54 +0200, Denis BUCHER wrote:
4. But now when I try a telnet (this machine) 25 from 213.213.213.213
I get Welcome and I am not rejected ?
Could someone tell me what I did wrong ?
Check
Jul 21 12:11:26 smtpd[31280]: connect from
mail-ww0-f46.google.com[74.125.82.46]
Jul 21 12:11:26 smtpd[31280]: 2E..36:
client=mail-ww0-f46.google.com[74.125.82.46]
Jul 21 12:11:26 cleanup[31284]: 2E..36: message-id=aanlk.@mail.gmail.com
Jul 21 12:11:34 smtpd[31280]: warning: 2E..36:
On 22/07/2010 11:54, Denis BUCHER wrote:
Dear all,
After hours of reading websites and this mailing list, and after many
unsuccessful tries, I would be happy if someone could help me.
I want to allow some incoming networks to be allowed to connect to our
servers and all the rest to be blocked.
Kai Krakow:
Bas,
why should that make a difference if it was already proven that
changing the optimization level of the compiler fixes the issue, and
that it is probably a special corner case of hardened gcc3.4? I
suppose it has to do with it's stack protecting techniques etc.
That is
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I can put a mail on HOLD and release it later with the postsuper command.
That's great for debugging purposes, but only if I need to send the message
just once.
Would it be possible to expand the postsuper command with an optional command
line parameter that releases
Sahil Tandon:
Time of death on Thu, Jul 22: 01:57:34 UTC
END OF THREAD. Please? :-)
Yes. I was posting that when my hotel's internet connection broke.
TRESPASSERS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE LIST.
Wietse
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I can put a mail on HOLD and release it later with the postsuper command.
That's great for debugging purposes, but only if I need to send the message
just once.
Would it be possible to expand the postsuper command with an
* Ralf Hildebrandt postfix-users@postfix.org:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I can put a mail on HOLD and release it later with the postsuper command.
That's great for debugging purposes, but only if I need to send the
message
just once.
Would it
Exim, supposedly, has a -bt option that when combined with the debug
flag option produces a detailed routing output useful for debugging.
How would one go about duplicating that in Postfix?
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 04:50 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Patrick Ben Koetter put forth on 7/22/2010 2:11 AM:
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Wietse Venema put forth on 7/21/2010 2:22 PM:
Ram:
One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
the mails to
* Jerry postfix-users@postfix.org:
Exim, supposedly, has a -bt option that when combined with the debug
flag option produces a detailed routing output useful for debugging.
How would one go about duplicating that in Postfix?
sendmail -bv ?
p...@rick
--
All technical questions asked
Patrick Ben Koetter:
Postfix queue files should not have multiple hard links.
Consider using RSYNC to COPY the file from the hold queue to the
incoming queue, using the same file name.
Once it's there, will it take the same path as the initial mail (on
HOLD) would have taken?
Hello.
First, I have spent two days reading articles and searching web for
solution but failed there. I am using postfix as an mx for my domains,
it accpets mail for different addresses withing my domains which is
then forwarded to other external domains, i.e. google.com and other
mail services.
Vasya Pupkin:
Hello.
First, I have spent two days reading articles and searching web for
solution but failed there. I am using postfix as an mx for my domains,
it accpets mail for different addresses withing my domains which is
then forwarded to other external domains, i.e. google.com and
Vasya Pupkin wrote:
Hello.
First, I have spent two days reading articles and searching web for
solution but failed there. I am using postfix as an mx for my domains,
it accpets mail for different addresses withing my domains which is
then forwarded to other external domains, i.e. google.com
I'm doing best I can to fight spam. What I described happens with spam
that pierced through all filters. There is no 100% way to detect spam
and you know that. So, some percentage will still go through and will
be forwarded, and possibly rejected, causing bounce to be generated.
On Thu, Jul 22,
It is already as restrictive as possible and acceptable for me. I do
not want to loose any non-spam mail as well, so I am not going insane
adding network block based rbl domains, but I am using most reliable
rbl domains, including zen.spamhaus.org, bl.spamcop.net,
cbl.abuseat.org,
Vasya Pupkin wrote:
Hello.
First, I have spent two days reading articles and searching web for
solution but failed there. I am using postfix as an mx for my domains,
it accpets mail for different addresses withing my domains which is
then forwarded to other external domains, i.e. google.com and
I just got an idea to use smtp_header_checks to discard mail from
postmas...@mydomain.tld which is used for bounce emails. I hope it
will work.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com wrote:
Vasya Pupkin wrote:
Hello.
First, I have spent two days reading
You of course understand that this is not possible, right?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Vasya Pupkin:
I'm doing best I can to fight spam.
Then you will have to predict what mail will be rejected down-stream.
Let me know when you solve that
In my experience, ALL the NDRs I've ever seen are useless - if mail is
bad, it should be REJECTed, otherwise the system is breaking down
somewhere.
Is there a way to just drop bounces on the floor?
Vasya Pupkin wrote (on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:52:22PM +0400):
You of course understand that this
Sometimes the downstream MX has a 'special cookbook' of super secret
anti-spam body checks, and you will always have this problem.
Vasya Pupkin wrote (on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:37:26PM +0400):
It is already as restrictive as possible and acceptable for me. I do
not want to loose any non-spam
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:52:22PM +0400, Vasya Pupkin wrote:
You of course understand that this is not possible, right?
Yes, I am sure he does. That was sarcasm. Anyway,
If the amount of backscatter is small, do not change behaviour. But
accept the fact that (prepare for) you might get
On 22/07/2010 16:29, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:52:22PM +04
If the amount of backscatter is small, do not change behaviour. But
accept the fact that (prepare for) you might get blacklisted in the
future.
If that is not acceptable, stop forwarding mail to domains that you do
I'm my own only customer. And I understand risks of disabling bounce
feature. I understand that someone will not get a notification if his
email will not be delivered to me, but I can live with it.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Eray Aslan eray.as...@caf.com.tr wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at
In particular, if a bounce is caused by a downstream MTA rejecting
an email because it's too large, then that's an unavoidable bounce.
But it's also unlikely to be backscatter
In my case it was one of the most reasons why my server acted as a
backscatterer.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:35:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Consider using RSYNC to COPY the file from the hold queue to the
incoming queue, using the same file name.
Once it's there, will it take the same path as the initial mail (on
HOLD) would have taken?
No, because only
* Victor Duchovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:35:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Consider using RSYNC to COPY the file from the hold queue to the
incoming queue, using the same file name.
Once it's there, will it take the same path as the initial mail
Hello,
I configured postfix with mysql virtual mailboxes following the instructions
on http://www.esdebian.org/wiki/servidor-correo (instructions are in
spanish, but I have attached the contents of the main.cf file for
reference). Everything worked fine, but I'm not able to forward e-mail to
On 7/22/2010 1:35 PM, TSPTS wrote:
Hello,
I configured postfix with mysql virtual mailboxes following the instructions
on http://www.esdebian.org/wiki/servidor-correo (instructions are in
spanish, but I have attached the contents of the main.cf file for
reference). Everything worked fine, but
Em 22/07/2010 15:49, Noel Jones escreveu:
This email was correctly delivered to gmail and the gmail server
acknowledged receipt. This isn't a postfix configuration issue.
If it doesn't show up in your mailbox, you'll need to check with them
for the reason. Maybe their spam filters
Vasya Pupkin:
In particular, if a bounce is caused by a downstream MTA rejecting
an email because it's too large, then that's an unavoidable bounce.
But it's also unlikely to be backscatter
In my case it was one of the most reasons why my server acted as a
backscatterer.
You have
On 07/20/2010 06:37 PM, mouss wrote:
LuKreme a écrit :
On 19-Jul-2010, at 17:40, Victor Duchovni wrote:
The .local TLD is used with mDNS and in conflict with Microsoft Active
Directory for an internal-only TLD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local
It is better to use exchange.example.com
* Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com:
I'll repeat myself. .local is not a reserved suffix. nor is
.localdomain, despite what linuxers seem to believe. using such domains
is a hijack. you are telling the IETF: we decided to use these suffixes
and you cannot use them anymore. This is
Thanks for your help. I created the /dev/urandom device file and
recompiled Postfix with SSL instead of TLS and now everything works like
a charm!
Warm regards,
Jon Kristensen
I have an internal relay..
- relay is mx for my-sub-domain
- relay forwards of emails to many domains through trusted_networks
- I want to drop all email to anyu...@my-sub-domain
right now it loops back to myself then bounces.. would prefer a drop..
- I would like to get email for one account -
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:24:52PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
Note, if rsync propagates file permissions before it copies file contents,
an incomplete queue file could be picked up by the queue manager before
it is completely
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote:
The local(8) and virtual(8) servers are separately compiled
programs (the latter being a stripped down version of the former).
The header files in question are not used in the same compilation
unit, and so this suggestion is
2010/7/22 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
The pass-by-value structure is part of a Postfix safety mechanism,
and therefore I am not inclined to change it to work around buggy
compiler features.
Wise decision... Stick with that. :-)
--
Regards,
Kai Krakow
http://hurikhan77.wordpress.com/
Thank you for your answers.
Should it be any different if disabled the virtual servers
configuration and used .forward redirections ?
Regards,
--
Tomás S.
2010/7/22 Leonardo Rodrigues leolis...@solutti.com.br:
Em 22/07/2010 15:49, Noel Jones escreveu:
This email was correctly delivered to
Greetings,
I haven't checked if it's a flaw in my configuration, but anyways, for the
records:
openSUSE 11.3 does not seem to automatically set up the TLS certs for the
chroot if you have smtp_tls_CApath set, but not smtpd_tls_CApath (note the
d in smtp vs. smtpd).
I needed to do this
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 13:08:32 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
Jul 21 12:11:26 smtpd[31280]: connect from
mail-ww0-f46.google.com[74.125.82.46]
Jul 21 12:11:26 smtpd[31280]: 2E..36:
client=mail-ww0-f46.google.com[74.125.82.46]
Jul 21 12:11:26 cleanup[31284]: 2E..36:
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 16:38:14 -0500, groups wrote:
I have an internal relay..
- relay is mx for my-sub-domain
- relay forwards of emails to many domains through trusted_networks
Hm? What is trusted_networks in the Postfix context?
- I want to drop all email to anyu...@my-sub-domain
Then
2010/7/22 Leonardo Rodriguesleolis...@solutti.com.br:
Em 22/07/2010 15:49, Noel Jones escreveu:
This email was correctly delivered to gmail and the gmail server
acknowledged receipt. This isn't a postfix configuration issue.
If it doesn't show up in your mailbox, you'll need to check with
52 matches
Mail list logo