Hello everyone,
a week ago I had a problem with a productive e-mail server rejecting
e-mail because an automatic configuration tool (cfengine) failed on me
and rolled out the wrong configuration file. After a very short amount
of time (less than an hour) postfix picked up the new configuration
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 at 09:40 CEST,
Thomas Glanzmann tho...@glanzmann.de wrote:
a week ago I had a problem with a productive e-mail server rejecting
e-mail because an automatic configuration tool (cfengine) failed on me
and rolled out the wrong configuration file. After a very
Halo,
We are have odd occasional problem where, some customer that have made up
name in hostname on pc and try send mail get rejected by us
submission is told use - submission inet n - n -
- smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
Charles Marcus:
On 2010-08-22 8:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/22/2010 7:34 PM:
So if we reverse the scenario and put the REJECT first, it's a final
decision? If so, and if I've described the situation correctly, why do
we have this
On 8/24/2010 7:24 AM, Edward avanti wrote:
Halo,
We are have odd occasional problem where, some customer that
have made up name in hostname on pc and try send mail get
rejected by us
submission is told use - submission inet n -
n - - smtpd
-o
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:24:44 +1000
Edward avanti edward.ava...@gmail.com articulated:
Halo,
We are have odd occasional problem where, some customer that have
made up name in hostname on pc and try send mail get rejected by us
submission is told use - submission inet n - n
I added the following lines to the configuration
master.cf
smtpslow unix - - n - - smtp
transport
yahoo.com smtpslow:
yahoo.com.arsmtpslow:
yahoo.com.mxsmtpslow:
ymail.com smtpslow:
main.cf
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
On 8/24/2010 7:41 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-08-22 8:38 PM, Stan Hoeppners...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/22/2010 7:34 PM:
So if we reverse the scenario and put the REJECT first, it's a final
decision? If so, and if I've described the situation correctly, why
Hi there,
I am using Postfix 2.4.3. As my first step to integrate with Postfix, I
wish to look up LDAP for local user.
I did not recompile Postfix because I thought it comes with LDAP
support. My ldap log does show that Postfix is trying to look up, so I
think it is fine there.
main.cf reads
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Magnus Bäck mag...@dsek.lth.se wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 at 23:20 CEST,
Mike 1100...@gmail.com wrote:
Noip.com manages DNS for my FQDN.
Should virtual_mailbox_domains = mail.example.com
or only example.com
That depends on whether you want
Thanks Wietse, works just fine.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Pablo Garcia Melga:
I added the following lines to the configuration
master.cf
smtpslow unix - - n - - smtp
transport
yahoo.com smtpslow:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:29 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/24/2010 10:24 AM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
We have a few companies that we need have ALL email traffic encrypted.
We can no longer 'blindly trust' the end user to not include sensitive
information in email. A VPN would be a easier
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 8/23/2010 10:11 AM:
Noel Jones:
(Might be time to revisit DNS whitelists in
postfix.)
Maybe someone can draft a strawman user interface:
- what is the configuration syntax
- what does that syntax mean
- how to make it safe (
First off, my apologies if this strays a bit off-list.
I'm trying to setup a test environment using TLS and a self-signed
certificate using Subject Alternative Name. From my research this should
allow me to use multiple hostnames with a single certificate.
I have no issues using TLS and a
Clayton Keller inetad...@ruraltel.net writes:
First off, my apologies if this strays a bit off-list.
I'm trying to setup a test environment using TLS and a self-signed
certificate using Subject Alternative Name. From my research this
should allow me to use multiple hostnames with a single
Hi,
When the Subject Alternative Name extension is present in a server
certificate, Postfix will use the first domain listed in that extension
as the verified peer name, unless one of the other domains satisfies
the matching rules for the destination TLS policy.
Aug 6 09:44:20 smtp01
Incoming mail is getting dropped into /var/spool/postfix/defer .
I'm seeing this error in /var/log/messages:
Aug 24 17:21:48 sato postfix/virtual[581]: warning: recipient
m...@example.com: bad uid example.com/mike/ 3001 3001 in
virtual_uid_maps
Aug 24 17:21:48 sato postfix/virtual[581]:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:35:42PM -0400, Alex wrote:
mail.messaging.microsoft.com[65.55.88.22]:25: Matched
subject_CN=*.messaging.microsoft.com, issuer_CN=Cybertrust SureServer
Standard Validation CA
...
What is your TLS policy for this destination? The wildcard Subject Alt Name
Le 24/08/2010 23:49, Mike a écrit :
Incoming mail is getting dropped into /var/spool/postfix/defer .
I'm seeing this error in /var/log/messages:
Aug 24 17:21:48 sato postfix/virtual[581]: warning: recipient
m...@example.com mailto:m...@example.com: bad uid example.com/mike/
Le 23/08/2010 04:47, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit :
Hi!
I got a curiosity, I have noted that the Date header the mail takes
comes from the client computer, so, if my computer have a wrong date,
my mail will go out with a wrong date too.
there is nothing curious about that. the Date
Thank you, gentlemen.
I always appreciate a good RTFM from talented folks who actually know
where they are pointing. :-)
I do appreciate the help and definitely do not intend to aggravate and vex.
Mike
Hi!
Thanks for your answer!
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:31 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Le 23/08/2010 04:47, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit :
Hi!
I got a curiosity, I have noted that the Date header the mail takes
comes from the client computer, so, if my computer have a
22 matches
Mail list logo
