Are there any extensions to Postfix that can aggregate multiple
outgoing emails into a single email within some time window?
We're developing an application that runs on multiple hosts and emails
notifications to us (the developers @gmail.com) whenever something
goes wrong, via a postfix server.
* Yang Zhang yanghates...@gmail.com:
Are there any extensions to Postfix that can aggregate multiple
outgoing emails into a single email within some time window?
Not that I'm aware of. You're thinking of something like a
mailing-list digest?
We're developing an application that runs on
On 09/08/2010 12:33 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Are there any extensions to Postfix that can aggregate multiple
outgoing emails into a single email within some time window?
We're developing an application that runs on multiple hosts and emails
notifications to us (the developers @gmail.com) whenever
On 3 sept. 2010, at 19:49, Mark Martinec wrote:
Machine does not look busy at all during those problems. Load is under 0.5
and CPU is 90% idle.
Even small emails are affected.
If the host is not busy, again, my primary suspect is a berkeley db.
These multiples of 20..25 second delays,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Mihira Fernando mihirathe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/08/2010 12:33 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Are there any extensions to Postfix that can aggregate multiple
outgoing emails into a single email within some time window?
We're developing an application that runs on
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Yang Zhang yanghates...@gmail.com:
This is why we're interested first and foremost throttling messages,
That's easy: either via a policy server OR you use something like
smtp_destination_rate_delay = 10s
On 2010-09-08 06:02, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
Am I missing something obvious?
With many ISPs providing generic PTR,
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname is too gentle.
I'd really like to implement reject_unknown_client_hostname, but I've
seen too many cases where address-name mapping
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:38:15PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
If you have customers sending large amounts of abusive mail, seems
as if there would be better ways to deal with that eg. sender
quotas, monitoring of undeliverable mail, inbound spam/virus
scanning, etc. But I'm not an ISP; I can
Le Wed, 8 Sep 2010 00:29:03 -0700,
Yang Zhang yanghates...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Mihira Fernando
mihirathe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/08/2010 12:33 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
Are there any extensions to Postfix that can aggregate multiple
outgoing emails into a
Hello @all
I wonder if there is a possibility to tell postfix how to route e-mails sender
and recipient dependent. Our scenario is as follows.
Postfix is anti spam and anti virus gateway for a couple of domains. Incoming
mail for all these domains is forwarded by the Provider to this gateway
Am 08.09.2010 11:36, schrieb Ilja Beeskow:
Hello @all
I wonder if there is a possibility to tell postfix how to route e-mails
sender and recipient dependent. Our scenario is as follows.
Postfix is anti spam and anti virus gateway for a couple of domains.
Incoming mail for all these
Ilja Beeskow:
Hello @all
I wonder if there is a possibility to tell postfix how to route e-mails
sender
and recipient dependent. Our scenario is as follows.
You may have to use an SMTPD policy daemon that replies with FILTER
transport:nexthop. Not every mail routing problem can be solved
Yang Zhang:
Are there any extensions to Postfix that can aggregate multiple
outgoing emails into a single email within some time window?
We're developing an application that runs on multiple hosts and emails
notifications to us (the developers @gmail.com) whenever something
goes wrong, via
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wietse Venema wrote:
| Yang Zhang:
| Are there any extensions to Postfix that can aggregate multiple
| outgoing emails into a single email within some time window?
8-8
| aggregating messages together into a periodic digest that is emitted
| at
Yang Zhang:
Are there any extensions to Postfix that can aggregate multiple
outgoing emails into a single email within some time window?
...
aggregating messages together into a periodic digest that is emitted
at most once per minute. Any other (low-effort) solution ideas would
be
pf at alt-ctrl-del.org:
Am I missing something obvious?
Yes.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
Wietse
Am 08.09.2010 12:40, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 08.09.2010 11:36, schrieb Ilja Beeskow:
Hello @all
I wonder if there is a possibility to tell postfix how to route e-mails
sender and recipient dependent. Our scenario is as follows.
[...]
Ilja
Am 08.09.2010 13:13, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Ilja Beeskow:
Hello @all
I wonder if there is a possibility to tell postfix how to route e-mails sender
and recipient dependent. Our scenario is as follows.
You may have to use an SMTPD policy daemon that replies with FILTER
transport:nexthop. Not
Richard Chapman wrote:
Perhaps you are describing an alternative method for google apps smtp
which I am unaware of. If so - can you point me to a description of this
alternative option?
I fail to see why you need postfix if your domain is hosted on Google
Apps. Google Apps provide you with
Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
and I still fail to understand how controlling your customers
envelope sender will help with backscatterer.org.
It will make sure that when viruses/malware on the customers computer is
sending out spam from fake addresses, the bounces goes back to the
customer
Is there a way to use virtual_tranport with virtual_alias for this case?
On Sep 3, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to integrate dspam filtering into my postfix system. The
way I have it now works for local users but when a user has an alias
to an external
On 09/08/2010 12:36 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:20:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
OP is an ISP providing outbound relay to residential users. his
problem is not easy to solve.
Thanks for understanding. I´ve gotten
Hi List,
I'm still struggling with dspam integration with postfix.
Now I have:
--
address_verify_map = btree:${data_directory}/verify
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/opt/redknot/postfix/aliases
config_directory = /etc/opt/redknot/postfix
disable_vrfy_command = yes
home_mailbox = Maildir/
mailbox_command
Martijn de Munnik:
So I'm using a mailbox_transport to call dspam. Unfortantly the mail
doesn't show up in the logs after the lmtp part (I have lmtp -v in
master.cf) and the mail isn't delivered. When I remove the
The mailbox_transport delivers the mail to dspam, therefore the
mail no
On Sep 8, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Martijn de Munnik:
So I'm using a mailbox_transport to call dspam. Unfortantly the mail
doesn't show up in the logs after the lmtp part (I have lmtp -v in
master.cf) and the mail isn't delivered. When I remove the
The mailbox_transport
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:12:45AM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
AFAIK smtp.google.com requires an authenticated TLS connection.
If you have a Google Apps hosted domain, you use fixed MTA credentials,
(possibly just an IP whitelist) negotiated with Google and send to
alternate servers (not
pf at alt-ctrl-del.org put forth on 9/7/2010 11:02 PM:
Am I missing something obvious?
With many ISPs providing generic PTR,
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname is too gentle.
I'd really like to implement reject_unknown_client_hostname, but I've
seen too many cases where address-name
Hello all,
I'm setting up a mail server that needs to read messages that are
created on the disk as individual files. This is an example file:
From: Test 123 t...@localhost
To: Diego Lima t...@domain.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Diego Lima li...@diegolima.org writes:
Hello all,
I'm setting up a mail server that needs to read messages that are
created on the disk as individual files. This is an example file:
From: Test 123 t...@localhost
To: Diego Lima t...@domain.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi Dieter,
I think I might have badly expressed myself :) The files on the disk
still need to be sent to the addresses in the To field. They have
simply been generated using an external program that can't talk smtp
directly with my postfix server and needs it to pick up and deliever
the messages.
Diego Lima put forth on 9/8/2010 2:46 PM:
I considered creating a
shellscript that checks the directory for new files and then sends
them using sendmail -t, but that isn't really good performance-wise.
Performance-wise? How many emails are you sending per minute? Unless
you have others
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 17:11 -0300, Diego Lima wrote:
Hi Dieter,
I think I might have badly expressed myself :) The files on the disk
still need to be sent to the addresses in the To field. They have
simply been generated using an external program that can't talk smtp
directly with my
Hi Stan,
This is actually a server for a mail marketing company, so I can
expect several thousands of messages per minute being sent from the
system. That's why I was wondering if there was any way to get postfix
to pick up the messages automatically (the less programs/scripts in
the way, the
* Diego Lima li...@diegolima.org:
Hi Stan,
This is actually a server for a mail marketing company, so I can
expect several thousands of messages per minute being sent from the
system. That's why I was wondering if there was any way to get postfix
to pick up the messages automatically (the
Hi all.
We have a local postfix server that relays to another postfix server via
VPN and I would like to remove the Received: headers so that only the
last one is included in the email message.
How do I proceed to do that? Do I need to set up altermime?
Thanks
-JK
* Jack Knowlton jknowl...@vp44.com:
Hi all.
We have a local postfix server that relays to another postfix server via
VPN and I would like to remove the Received: headers so that only the
last one is included in the email message.
How do I proceed to do that? Do I need to set up altermime?
$
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:33:40PM -0300, Diego Lima wrote:
This is actually a server for a mail marketing company, so I can
expect several thousands of messages per minute being sent from the
system.
A company in the business of sending email is expected to use tooling
sufficiently
Le 07/09/2010 23:36, Jan-Frode Myklebust a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:20:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
OP is an ISP providing outbound relay to residential users. his
problem is not easy to solve.
Thanks for understanding. I´ve gotten
Le 08/09/2010 10:44, Jan-Frode Myklebust a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:38:15PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
If you have customers sending large amounts of abusive mail, seems
as if there would be better ways to deal with that eg. sender
quotas, monitoring of undeliverable mail, inbound
Diego Lima put forth on 9/8/2010 3:33 PM:
Hi Stan,
This is actually a server for a mail marketing company, so I can
expect several thousands of messages per minute being sent from the
system. That's why I was wondering if there was any way to get postfix
to pick up the messages
40 matches
Mail list logo