Many thanks Victor. I am learning all the time...:-)
Richard.
On 14/09/2010 12:35 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:54:36PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
relayhost = smtp.gmail.com:submission
That should probably be:
relayhost = [smtp.gmail.com]:submission
I d
I think I have found two of the problems. See below.
On 13/09/2010 11:39 PM, Richard Chapman wrote:
On 13/09/2010 9:35 PM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-13 13:03, Richard Chapman wrote:
Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home straight, but I still
It looks like a virus somewhere
Sahil Tandon put forth on 9/13/2010 8:31 PM:
> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 19:20:05 -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
>> I've not had to use anything involving a DNSBL and a password before
>> so just curious what I'm missing.
>
> That is probably because you do not pay for a DNSBL datafeed. :) In such
> cases,
On 09/13/2010 09:31 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 19:20:05 -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
I'm a bit confused with the postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map option.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
I've not had to use anything involving a DNSBL and a password
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 19:20:05 -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
> I'm a bit confused with the postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map option.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
> I've not had to use anything involving a DNSBL and a password before
> so just curious what I'm missing.
T
Hi Jasper
I have found one of the remaining problems - and it isn't postfix
related. See below.
On 13/09/2010 11:39 PM, Richard Chapman wrote:
On 13/09/2010 9:35 PM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-13 13:03, Richard Chapman wrote:
Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home straight
Thanks so much for your reply. Yes, as the error message said, the
configuration was incorrect. I had not tinkered with the main.cf file
for some time, so overlooked this. I have made the correction and
things are working fine.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Christop
On 09/13/2010 07:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Matt Hayes:
Thanks for the update. I'm working on implementing this now, however,
I'm a bit confused with the postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map option.
I know this is useful when you enabled the DEEP checks, which I plan on
doing, but want to make sure I h
Hi Wietse,
that sounds great.
Is there a RHEL5 source package available for building postfix-2.8-20100913?
Thanks
Morten
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Monday,
Matt Hayes:
> Thanks for the update. I'm working on implementing this now, however,
> I'm a bit confused with the postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map option.
>
> I know this is useful when you enabled the DEEP checks, which I plan on
> doing, but want to make sure I have the full concept behind the abov
://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/POSTSCREEN_README.html
for an overview, configuration information and more.
The last code drop was postfix-2.8-20100913, which is the same code
as snapshot 20100912, but with a bunch of minor documentation fixes.
Be sure to review the RELEASE_NOTES file if you are
I'm running CentOS with postfix 2.3.3, amavisd-new, and spamassassin 3.3.
History: My postfix mail server for domainA is also the secondary mail
server for domainB. A ton of email destined for domainB runs through
the secondary mail server, all spam using the secondary . (This is
actually
* Christopher Adams :
> Hello all,
>
> I have a server with Postfix and it is not processing mail. I have set
> up some aliases in /etc/postfix/aliases and after updating them, I run
> postalias /etc/postfix/aliases. When I send to any of the aliases,
> here is the message I get back:
>
> Out: 22
Hello all,
I have a server with Postfix and it is not processing mail. I have set
up some aliases in /etc/postfix/aliases and after updating them, I run
postalias /etc/postfix/aliases. When I send to any of the aliases,
here is the message I get back:
Out: 220 huck.plinkit.org ESMTP Postfix
In:
/POSTSCREEN_README.html
for an overview, configuration information and more.
The last code drop was postfix-2.8-20100913, which is the same code
as snapshot 20100912, but with a bunch of minor documentation fixes.
Be sure to review the RELEASE_NOTES file if you are upgrading from
an older postscreen version
I'm running CentOS with postfix 2.3.3, amavisd-new, and spamassassin 3.3.
History: My postfix mail server for domainA is also the secondary
mail server for domainB. A ton of email destined for domainB runs
through the secondary mail server, all spam using the secondary .
(This is actually a
On 9/10/2010 00:32, Nick Edwards wrote:
> Good day all,
> I apologize in advance if the moderators consider this slightly OT.
>
> We have many users moved to a MySQL database, planned for moving away
> from Cyrus on Sunday Oct 3, we are almost ready to go but found a
> problem with pop3 software w
On 13.09.2010 19:29 Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:23:41PM +0200, Valentin Gjorgjioski wrote:
Have tried this
SELECT destination FROM view_aliases WHERE '%s' like
concat('%%',email,'%%') and '%...@%d' not in (select email from view_users);
Postmap does a single lookup with
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:23:41PM +0200, Valentin Gjorgjioski wrote:
> Have tried this
> SELECT destination FROM view_aliases WHERE '%s' like
> concat('%%',email,'%%') and '%...@%d' not in (select email from view_users);
Postmap does a single lookup with the literal key you supply. Virtual
alia
On 13.09.2010 18:59 Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:52:49PM +0200, ??
wrote:
/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf
Important line:
query = SELECT destination FROM view_aliases WHERE '%s' like
concat('%%',email,'%%') and '%s' not in (select
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:12:14PM +0200, Valentin Gjorgjioski wrote:
> On 13.09.2010 18:59 Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:52:49PM +0200,
>> ?? wrote:
>>
>>> /etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf
>>> Important line:
>>> query = SELECT des
On 13.09.2010 18:59 Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:52:49PM +0200, ??
wrote:
/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf
Important line:
query = SELECT destination FROM view_aliases WHERE '%s' like
concat('%%',email,'%%') and '%s' not in (select
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:52:49PM +0200, ??
wrote:
> /etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf
> Important line:
> query = SELECT destination FROM view_aliases WHERE '%s' like
> concat('%%',email,'%%') and '%s' not in (select email from
> view_users);
Think about
Today I did tried to implement one catch-all email per domain.
Actually it seems to me that I hit some bug which is most probably
very unlikely ... but still I want to share this experience and maybe
someone will point out where my problem lies.
postconf -n
Important lines:
virtual_alias_map
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:54:36PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
>>> relayhost = smtp.gmail.com:submission
>>
>> That should probably be:
>>
>> relayhost = [smtp.gmail.com]:submission
>>
>> I don't think that "smtp.gmail.com" is intended to be an MX RRset.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand th
Hi Victor
On 13/09/2010 10:02 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:01:19PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
Thanks to everyone who has helped with this. There are several of you nd
your help is much appreciated.
My recent posting on the "trust" issue with the google certificat
On 13/09/2010 9:35 PM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-13 13:03, Richard Chapman wrote:
Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home straight, but I still
It looks like a virus somewhere - but I'm not sure where. All the
windows boxes here look well protected - but it almost looks like a
vi
Ralph,
> A1: Have Postfix accept mail on port 587 from SASL-authenticated
> clients only.
> A2: Remove "Received:" headers to hide internal routing.
> A3: Inject mail into amavisd-new for virus checks and DKIM signing.
With the help of custom hooks this can be achieved by amavisd itself:
ama
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:26:06PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
> I got error for different domains (almost all domains).
> And I specify DNS server and postfix get data from this server.
And you have completely failed to read
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
and follow
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:01:19PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who has helped with this. There are several of you nd
> your help is much appreciated.
> My recent posting on the "trust" issue with the google certificates is not
> sorted - but is a red herring as far as thi
Hi,
I got error for different domains (almost all domains).
And I specify DNS server and postfix get data from this server.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:08:48PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
>
> >
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:08:48PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
> I got the following error in maillog file from last 4-5 days whenever I send
> the message :
>
> ???
> Sep 13 06:31:58 dell860-504 postfix/smtp[8930]: 16A1842B81DA: to=<
> x...@xx.com>, relay=none, delay=1.6, delays=1.3/
Hi,
I got the following error in maillog file from last 4-5 days whenever I send
the message :
♫
Sep 13 06:31:58 dell860-504 postfix/smtp[8930]: 16A1842B81DA: to=<
x...@xx.com>, relay=none, delay=1.6, delays=1.3/0/0.33/0, dsn=4.4.1,
status=deferred (connect to xxx.com[xxx.xxx.xxx.xx]: Con
On 2010-09-13 13:03, Richard Chapman wrote:
> Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home straight, but I still
> have a couple of questions:-)
>
> [snip]
> As you can probably guess - I have fiddled with quite a few things
> over the last few days - and may not have been as careful as I shou
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:06:22AM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> here is my dilemma. OSX 10.6 comes stock with postfix 2.6 without LDAP
> support. I really like the ability to do ldap queries for local info
> and transport info (great feature). So what is the best way to upgrade?
Compile a ve
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> donovan jeffrey j:
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>
donovan jeffrey j:
> greetings
>
> i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX
Ralph,
> On 12.09.10 10:46, mouss wrote:
> > Received headers should not be included in the DKIM signature. so
> > removing them won't invalidate DKIM.
>
> If you have a look at my message which you quoted, you'll see
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=seichter.de; h=
>
Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home straight, but I still
have a couple of questions:-)
On 13/09/2010 12:09 AM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-12 17:41, Richard Chapman wrote:
Thanks again Jasper. I have enabled local -v debug logging - and I
think we can see in more detail
Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> So basically, using postifx's virtual, excluding Dovecot, what POP3
> servers are people using?
Hi Nick,
We have been happy with Courier for POP and IMAP for years. Not a single
problem. We are using it with Postfix's virtual.
http://www.courier-mta.org/imap/
Most Linux
39 matches
Mail list logo
