>What I want to know is, who/what is routing these messages, currently,
>to an Exchange mailbox, and will they be changing that routing to a
>mailbox that YOU specify when they "break" your use of Exchange?
This routing is done by Cerberus, I can configure Cerberus to grab
mails from any another lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11.11.2010 22:10, Voytek Eymont a écrit :
>
> On Fri, November 12, 2010 6:16 am, Carlos Mennens wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> wrote:
>
>> This would be no problem except I've never attempted this before and
>> just
On 11/11/2010 4:45 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/11/2010 3:24 PM, John Hinton wrote:
I am new to Postfix. Sorry :(
This is a hosting server and I am having problems with only
some users sending email and only from what appears to be
certain ISPs. The one I'm working on at the moment is rr.com
Fi
On 11/11/2010 3:24 PM, John Hinton wrote:
I am new to Postfix. Sorry :(
This is a hosting server and I am having problems with only
some users sending email and only from what appears to be
certain ISPs. The one I'm working on at the moment is rr.com
First, I can set up an email account for thi
On 11/11/2010 4:24 PM, John Hinton wrote:
I am new to Postfix. Sorry :(
This is a hosting server and I am having problems with only some users
sending email and only from what appears to be certain ISPs. The one
I'm working on at the moment is rr.com
First, I can set up an email account for
I am new to Postfix. Sorry :(
This is a hosting server and I am having problems with only some users
sending email and only from what appears to be certain ISPs. The one I'm
working on at the moment is rr.com
First, I can set up an email account for this same user and send just
fine. I am no
first, my problem from october is resolved, thanks to the help i got
from this list. basically i lacked the requisite knowledge. i'm
getting closer to competent, thanks.
(was: postfix not delivering all by itself. (it is now.))
i'm considering adding greylisting and SPF to postfix.
(ah, FWIW i
On Fri, November 12, 2010 6:16 am, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> This would be no problem except I've never attempted this before and
> just did some searching on the web for tutorials I can follow since I don't
> have any experience and hone
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:12:44PM -0200, Pedro Axelrud wrote:
> Sorry, I don't exacly got it. What is the problem of having a high
> minimal_backoff_time in a normal a MTA?
> You suggest me to have a fallback_relay only to try to deliver that
> messages, right?
This causes high latency for messa
On 11/11/2010 09:12 PM, Pedro Axelrud wrote:
Sorry, I don't exacly got it. What is the problem of having a high
minimal_backoff_time in a normal a MTA?
Delays in mail delivery ?
You suggest me to have a fallback_relay only to try to deliver that
messages, right?
I didn't, but it's not a bad
Sorry, I don't exacly got it. What is the problem of having a high
minimal_backoff_time in a normal a MTA?
You suggest me to have a fallback_relay only to try to deliver that
messages, right?
Thanks
Pedro Axelrud
http://mailee.me
http://softa.com.br
http://flavors.me/pedroaxl
On Thu, Nov 11,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss wrote:
|> anyone know that level of difficultly involved from turning SRPM's
|> into a RPM file I can use / distribute to others? I have the time and
|> dedication but lack the experience and knowledge.
|
|
|
| http://perso.b2b2c.ca/sarrazip/dev
Le 11/11/2010 20:16, Carlos Mennens a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
Simon also publishes SRPMs, so you can build an equivalent RPM on any
latest/greatest release of an O/S, for which Simon has not yet uploaded
a binary package. You really should always do that
On 11/11/2010 08:16 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
Simon also publishes SRPMs, so you can build an equivalent RPM on any
latest/greatest release of an O/S, for which Simon has not yet uploaded
a binary package. You really should always do
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> Simon also publishes SRPMs, so you can build an equivalent RPM on any
> latest/greatest release of an O/S, for which Simon has not yet uploaded
> a binary package. You really should always do that, and not trust that
> some downloaded colle
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:46:06PM -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> I know there's an un-official 2.7 Postfix RPM that I believe Simon
> created for RHEL 5 64-bit but does anyone know if there's a RHEL 6
> 64-bit version available or if the RHEL 5 version will install / work
> on RHEL 6?
Simon also
I know there's an un-official 2.7 Postfix RPM that I believe Simon
created for RHEL 5 64-bit but does anyone know if there's a RHEL 6
64-bit version available or if the RHEL 5 version will install / work
on RHEL 6?
On 11/11/2010 05:10 PM, Pedro Axelrud wrote:
Yeah, what Mark said is totally correct, the message is almost the
same to the two million recipients, but each delivery has one
recipient and different links to track clicks, let him/her
u_n_s_u_b_s_c_r_i_b_e (my reply before this got
Jeroen, thank you for your post its very informative and its what I was
looking for.
Paul.
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:48 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: confuse
>
> Yeah, what Mark said is totally correct, the message is almost the same to
> the two million recipients, but each delivery has one recipient and
> different links to track clicks, let him/her u_n_s_u_b_s_c_r_i_b_e (my reply
> before this got bounced because it have these word so they thought I
On 11/11/2010 14:56, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 11/11/2010 03:14 PM, Pedro Axelrud wrote:
Hello guys,
We have a startup with an email marketing web app, we are very rigid
with our clients to not allow spammers.
One of our client's wants to send a message to two million contacts
HOW will they be
On 11/11/2010 03:14 PM, Pedro Axelrud wrote:
Hello guys,
We have a startup with an email marketing web app, we are very rigid
with our clients to not allow spammers.
One of our client's wants to send a message to two million contacts
HOW will they be sending these messages ?
That's the most
Hello guys,
We have a startup with an email marketing web app, we are very rigid with
our clients to not allow spammers.
One of our client's wants to send a message to two million contacts and I am
worried with some details. I am not worried about the time that will take to
send all those messages
sunhux G wrote:
Will the messages still be located on the Exch server after POP3 is
disabled?
No, there's no messages stored on the Exch server : in fact currently
the Cerberus Hdesk software will connect up to the Exch server quite
frequently (I'm not sure how frequent) such that any email
Le 10/11/2010 17:09, Toomas Vendelin a écrit :
Found it!
proxy_interfaces =
was missing. Works fine now.
I doubt this was the reason that makes the client disconnect after EHLO.
it's more probable that the problem was related to STARTTLS and/or SASL
configuration. Example: if the client is
25 matches
Mail list logo
