On 2011-07-27 04:43, Jack Bates wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jack Bates:
I want Postfix to deliver messages to an LMTP server - and for better
or worse, the LMTP server accepts envelope recipients with just a
mailbox name, e.g. "RCPT TO:"
The LMTP protocol is
Hi list,
I need to limit the quantity of messages sent by my users from
command line (calling sendmail directly), ie: 100 messages by day per
user. Looking at the documentation I had thought of using
non_smtpd_milters and write a milter filter to do this using the uid
as the key to control the nu
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jack Bates:
>> I want Postfix to deliver messages to an LMTP server - and for better
>> or worse, the LMTP server accepts envelope recipients with just a
>> mailbox name, e.g. "RCPT TO:"
>
> The LMTP protocol is identical to SMTP with very f
Steve Jenkins:
> As far as parallel submissions, we're only doing three at a time
> (three SwiftMail processes sending at a time). Our in_flow_delay
> parameter is set to 0. We aren't receiving a lot of mail on this box,
> so I'm not sure that delay would even kick in if it were set to the 1s
> def
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:47 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> postscreen(8) protects smtpd(8), not smtp(8). Bots are not a problem
> for the latter. You might want to take some time to review this:
> http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
Hi, Rob. Thanks for the quick reply. And cool - learned something
a
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 03:32:50PM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> We send a moderately decent amount of legitimate mail to our
> subscribers (about 400K opt-in newsletter members) using Postfix. We
> get excellent inbox deliverability percentages, because we use the
> latest version of Postfix with
We send a moderately decent amount of legitimate mail to our
subscribers (about 400K opt-in newsletter members) using Postfix. We
get excellent inbox deliverability percentages, because we use the
latest version of Postfix with settings we've arrived at with the help
of many on this list, are on th
Le 26/07/2011 23:07, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:24:23PM +0200, mouss wrote:
>
> He's only running one postfix smtpd, the other host in the above log is
> bitdefender.
> The simplest would be to change the hostname of either postfix or
> bitdefender, whic
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:24:23PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> >>> He's only running one postfix smtpd, the other host in the above log is
> >>> bitdefender.
> >>> The simplest would be to change the hostname of either postfix or
> >>> bitdefender, whichever makes more sense.
> >>>
> is is
> e
Le 26/07/2011 17:40, Claudio Prono a écrit :
>
>
> Il 26/07/2011 17.37, Jerry ha scritto:
>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:22:19 +0200
>> Claudio Prono articulated:
>>
>>> Il 26/07/2011 17.13, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Claudio Prono:
> Hello all,
>
> This problem is made me mad all toda
Le 20/07/2011 07:32, Thomas Zehbe a écrit :
> Am Dienstag 19 Juli 2011, 22:20:25 schrieb mouss:
>> Le 19/07/2011 09:05, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
>>> On 2011-07-19 00:31, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 19:01, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
> On 2011-07-17 20:19, mouss wrote:
>> Le 17/07/2011 12:4
Jack Bates:
> I want Postfix to deliver messages to an LMTP server - and for better
> or worse, the LMTP server accepts envelope recipients with just a
> mailbox name, e.g. "RCPT TO:"
The LMTP protocol is identical to SMTP with very few differences,
and therefore it requires a complete email addre
I want Postfix to deliver messages to an LMTP server - and for better
or worse, the LMTP server accepts envelope recipients with just a
mailbox name, e.g. "RCPT TO:"
Is it possible to configure Postfix to deliver to this LMTP server?
All my efforts have resulted in envelope recipients with a domai
Claudio Prono:
> Ok, now works. Is strange but if i set the permissions of the folder
> /var/run/authdaemon.courier-imap to 777, it doesn't work, and the error
> is the last i have posted.
> If i set the permissions correctly, like this:
>
> drwxrwx--- 2 root postfix 4096 Jul 26 17:35
On 2011-07-26 17:40, Claudio Prono wrote:
Il 26/07/2011 17.37, Jerry ha scritto:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:22:19 +0200
Claudio Prono articulated:
Il 26/07/2011 17.13, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Claudio Prono:
Hello all,
This problem is made me mad all today, with no solution...
Turn off chroo
Il 26/07/2011 17.37, Jerry ha scritto:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:22:19 +0200
> Claudio Prono articulated:
>
>> Il 26/07/2011 17.13, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
>>> Claudio Prono:
Hello all,
This problem is made me mad all today, with no solution...
>>> Turn off chroot. This is a magic
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:22:19 +0200
Claudio Prono articulated:
>
> Il 26/07/2011 17.13, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> > Claudio Prono:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> This problem is made me mad all today, with no solution...
> > Turn off chroot. This is a magical cure for many mysteries.
> >
> > http://w
Il 26/07/2011 17.13, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> Claudio Prono:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This problem is made me mad all today, with no solution...
> Turn off chroot. This is a magical cure for many mysteries.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot
>
> If that solves the problem, compla
Claudio Prono:
> Hello all,
>
> This problem is made me mad all today, with no solution...
Turn off chroot. This is a magical cure for many mysteries.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot
If that solves the problem, complain to your distributor. They
should not turn on chroot and
Perhaps you are running postfix on a chroot?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This problem is made me mad all today, with no solution...
>
> My /etc/sasl2/smtp.conf
>
> pwcheck_method: authdaemond
> log_level: 3
> mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN
> authdaemond_path: /
Hello all,
This problem is made me mad all today, with no solution...
My /etc/sasl2/smtp.conf
pwcheck_method: authdaemond
log_level: 3
mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN
authdaemond_path: /var/run/authdaemon.courier-imap/socket
ls -la /var/run/authdaemon.courier-imap/socket
srwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 26
Wietse:
> Sorry, syslogging 1kbyte strings is not a safe setting for world-wide
> deployment, so these patches can't go into the code base as is.
Varadi Gabor:
> Is it a good solution for You, that we put the printout-length to a variable
> to main.cf which defaults the hardwired value, and anybo
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:09:12AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Varadi Gabor:
> > Dear Developers!
> >
> > We are using postfix as an MTA for a long time ago at sevaral places.
> >
> > We would like if the attached patch(es) gets applied to the mainline so we
> > didn't need to apply it to the s
Varadi Gabor:
> Dear Developers!
>
> We are using postfix as an MTA for a long time ago at sevaral places.
>
> We would like if the attached patch(es) gets applied to the mainline so we
> didn't need to apply it to the source and build a new .deb
> +package every time a new version came out.
>
>
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 10:34:57 +0300, kibirango moses wrote:
> I configured recipient_blacklist using postfix as below in order to
> block users from replying fake emails.
>
> But i am getting problems with my mail clients as they are unable to send
> mail.
Show logs that relate exactly to the
Dear Developers!
We are using postfix as an MTA for a long time ago at sevaral places.
We would like if the attached patch(es) gets applied to the mainline so we
didn't need to apply it to the source and build a new .deb
+package every time a new version came out.
The purpose of the pacth is to
Hullo Users,
I configured recipient_blacklist using postfix as below in order to
block users from replying fake emails.
But i am getting problems with my mail clients as they are unable to send mail.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_blacklist
#po
27 matches
Mail list logo
