Hello
I have to setup a virtual postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
The server will be a small one supporting approx 1000 mailboxes
the machine is a virtual one hosted at OVH (France) running Ubuntu
10.4 LTS
with 4 Gb of dedicated
Zitat von Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
Hello
I have to setup a virtual postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
The server will be a small one supporting approx 1000 mailboxes
the machine is a virtual one hosted at OVH (France) running
Hi Frank
this may depend on admin tools you need/have to maintain your
background DB.
Because we in our domain have an LDAP-Web Client , we chose LDAP as
backgroung DB.
Others may have sofisticated MySQL clients, which makes them choose
MySQL as background DB.
suomi
On 2011-11-16 10:03,
Le 11/16/2011 10:20 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
Hello
I have to setup a virtual postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
The server will be a small one supporting approx 1000 mailboxes
the
Zitat von Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
Le 11/16/2011 10:20 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
Hello
I have to setup a virtual postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
The server will be a
Le 11/16/2011 11:00 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
Le 11/16/2011 10:20 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
Hello
I have to setup a virtual postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.7.1-1+squeeze1 with OpenLDAP. Everything works fine
except one thing. If I send an E-Mail to $myname@$nonlocaldomain.com
it's delivered to my local postbox.
This becomes a major problem when you need to send E-Mails to
role-accounts like abuse, postmaster or info. ;)
On 2011-11-16 6:57 AM, Denis Witt denis.w...@concepts-and-training.de
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.7.1-1+squeeze1 with OpenLDAP. Everything works fine
except one thing. If I send an E-Mail to $myname@$nonlocaldomain.com
it's delivered to my local postbox.
This becomes a major problem when
Hi,
In our postfix server, we see
SSL_accept error from hgrs-mail01.hgrs.tld.dom[161.x.y.z]: 0
Nov 16 08:54:52 postfix2cc/smtpd[18662]: warning: TLS library problem:
18662:error:140943E8:SSL
routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:reason(1000):s3_pkt.c:1053:SSL alert number 0:
This error message apparently
On 11/16/2011 5:57 AM, Denis Witt wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Postfix 2.7.1-1+squeeze1 with OpenLDAP. Everything works
fine except one thing. If I send an E-Mail to
$myname@$nonlocaldomain.com it's delivered to my local postbox.
This becomes a major problem when you need to send E-Mails to
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 and I have configured two postfix instances. I want
to display ip of sending domain in log . I tried smtp_bind_address but this
didn't work. Any suggestions about this ?
Regards
On 11/16/2011 7:07 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 and I have configured two postfix instances.
I want to display ip of sending domain in log . I tried
smtp_bind_address but this didn’t work. Any suggestions about this ?
Regards
Postfix does not log the
On 16.11.2011 13:54, Noel Jones wrote:
One of your LDAP lookups is broken, matching more than it should.
Test your lookups with postmap -q myn...@nonlocal.example.com
ldap:table to find what's returning an answer when it shouldn't.
Hi Noel,
thanks for the hint. Now it's working.
Best
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 03:03:42 Frank Bonnet wrote:
I have to setup a virtual postfix server and I wonder what would
be the best / most efficient choice for the DB backend ?
Best is subjective. All choices have good and bad points. Local
files, however, have the advantage of not relying
Hi,
I'd like to have an ACCEPT action for *header_checks and body_checks.
This was requested before:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2005-02/1116.html
I've read the replies in that thread, and I continue to think that
adding an ACCEPT action for *header_checks and body_checks is
On 2011-11-16 15:43, Amira Othman wrote:
How can I separate logs of the instances to be different files?
Postfix logs to syslog; where these logs end up is not under postfix's
control.
--
J.
Please stop top-posting. Thank you.
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 08:43:49 Amira Othman wrote:
How can I separate logs of the instances to be different files?
You asked this last week, on Thursday. Brian and I answered you.
--
Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
/dev/rob0
On 11/16/2011 8:32 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to have an ACCEPT action for *header_checks and body_checks.
This was requested before:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2005-02/1116.html
I've read the replies in that thread, and I continue to think that
adding
Any one ?
If virtual_users contains the following entry, what will be the postmap query
to retrieve the value pair?
I know postfix is RFC822 compliant as well this email ID, so i'm confident some
genius will come up with a
suitable query to retrieve the value.
virtual_users
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:36:21AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/16/2011 8:32 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
I'd like to have an ACCEPT action for *header_checks and body_checks.
This was requested before:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2005-02/1116.html
I've read the
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:06:36 Solar Designer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:36:21AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
If you need more fine-grained control, use eg. SpamAssassin.
I don't feel that whitelisting of PGP-encrypted messages is more
fine-grained than the kind of blacklisting
Solar Designer:
[on whitelisting]
State, including what message the line belongs to, is not saved
between lines.
Adding any kind of whole-message action would require major changes
to the way cleanup works, and is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
I admit I'm not familiar with the
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:39:00 I wrote:
A single reject action anywhere before acceptance causes the mail
to be rejected. Numerous permit (or dunno) actions are required
for acceptance; one per restriction stage, one per each header
evaluated in header_checks(5), one for each line in
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:39:00AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:06:36 Solar Designer wrote:
I admit I'm not familiar with the code and I haven't tried to
implement ACCEPT yet, but aren't DISCARD and REJECT also
whole-message actions? Is ACCEPT somehow very
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:48:34AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ACCEPT is simply to explain only if it disables all further checks.
Things become messy otherwise.
Maybe we should call it other than ACCEPT, then - to make it clear that
other restrictions elsewhere may still reject the message?
Hi all,
I google and couldn't find any answer about how to configurate the postfix to
forward wildcard emails to anther email account.
I cannot use catchall account because I have 3 seperate email accounts to deal
with different bounced email purpose. I tried the alias and didn't work.
On 16/11/11 18:07, Mark2 wrote:
That's what I would like to do:
_re...@mymail.com -- re...@mymail.com
_nore...@mymail.com -- nore...@mymail.com
xxx_s...@mymail.com -- s...@mymail.com
Is this format of the address a strict requirement?
Otherwise, you can have them in the format
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated, nightly,
incremental file backup for my mail server.
This is admittedly a tangential topic, but I know the users here will
have good insights (or at least send me in the right direction). Hoping
for maybe 5
Am 16.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated, nightly,
incremental file backup for my mail server.
these days i would go ahead and move the mailserver on a VMware-vCenter and
with the essentials-plus license you
Solar Designer:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:39:00AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:06:36 Solar Designer wrote:
I admit I'm not familiar with the code and I haven't tried to
implement ACCEPT yet, but aren't DISCARD and REJECT also
whole-message actions? Is
We use backuppc from backuppc.sf.net for all of our backup needs. We have 6TB of storage notched out for this and here are the specs as of today:
BackupPC: Host Summary
This status was generated at 11/16 11:54.
Pool file system was recently at 94% (11/16 11:46), todays max is 94%
Hello,
I'm trying to get spf going on my arch postfix server. I'm wanting to
get perl-policyd-spf going and am atempting to download the needed
source. The issue is openspf.org appears down, anyone know why or if
there's an alternative download available?
Thanks.
Dave.
Solar Designer:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:48:34AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ACCEPT is simply to explain only if it disables all further checks.
Things become messy otherwise.
Maybe we should call it other than ACCEPT, then - to make it clear that
other restrictions elsewhere may still
On 11/16/2011 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated, nightly,
incremental file backup for my mail server.
these days i would go ahead and move the mailserver on a VMware-vCenter
unfortunately this has happened before :(
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/34195
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, David Mehler wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:01:33 -0500
From: David Mehler dave.meh...@gmail.com
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: openspf.org
Hello,
On 16 November 2011 13:01, David Mehler dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get spf going on my arch postfix server. I'm wanting to
get perl-policyd-spf going and am atempting to download the needed
source. The issue is openspf.org appears down, anyone know why or if
there's an
Am 16.11.2011 19:04, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
and making a restore request goes to their sysadmin
ticketing system and takes days and days. :-(
if this happens they are not useable for any business
i fear you will get no hosting with direct access to the VMware-level because
this would mean
On 11/16/2011 1:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 19:04, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
and making a restore request goes to their sysadmin
ticketing system and takes days and days. :-(
if this happens they are not useable for any business
i fear you will get no hosting with direct access
On 11/16/11 18:17, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
I was wondering what data backup systems people use?
I found that filesystem snapshots are the easiest solution.
Depending on disk space I keep several snapshots around and at night one
is used for an incremental backup with dump(8).
--
Martin
On 11/16/2011 1:36 PM, Martin Schütte wrote:
On 11/16/11 18:17, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
I was wondering what data backup systems people use?
I found that filesystem snapshots are the easiest solution.
Depending on disk space I keep several snapshots around and at night one
is used for an
may be of interest.
works with postfix
http://archiveopteryx.org/postfix
On 11/16/2011 1:36 PM, Martin Schütte wrote:
On 11/16/11 18:17, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
I was wondering what data backup systems people use?
I found that filesystem snapshots are the easiest solution.
Depending on disk space I keep several snapshots around and at night one
is used for an
Wietse,
Thank you for your comments and explanation!
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:04:10PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
I must confess that I no longer understand what the purpose is of
ACCEPT in header_checks, if the purpose is other than skipping
all further lookups of all header_checks tables.
Zitat von Daniel Bromberg dan...@basezen.com:
On 11/16/2011 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated, nightly,
incremental file backup for my mail server.
these days i would go
On 11/16/2011 3:40 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Daniel Bromberg dan...@basezen.com:
On 11/16/2011 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 18:17, schrieb Daniel Bromberg:
Greetings All,
I am looking for the best way to do online/offsite, automated,
nightly,
incremental
Solar Designer:
Wietse,
Thank you for your comments and explanation!
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:04:10PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
I must confess that I no longer understand what the purpose is of
ACCEPT in header_checks, if the purpose is other than skipping
all further lookups of
On 2011-11-16 18:07, Mark2 wrote:
Hi all,
I google and couldn't find any answer about how to configurate the postfix to
forward wildcard emails to anther email account.
I cannot use catchall account because I have 3 seperate email accounts to deal
with different bounced email purpose. I tried
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:11:17PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
As I explained in a different response, there is no this table
concept outside the low-level (pcre, hash, etc.) table itself. At
higher levels, there is a lookup result without source attribution.
Considering Postfix's drive to
Solar Designer:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:11:17PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
As I explained in a different response, there is no this table
concept outside the low-level (pcre, hash, etc.) table itself. At
higher levels, there is a lookup result without source attribution.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:02:03PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Solar Designer:
OK. I took a look at the code and I see those difficulties now. How
about something like the attached patch? It's totally untested other
than that it compiles, and it's probably wrong (especially considering
Hi,
I built a dual-Xeon quad-core box with 8GB using fedora15 and
postfix-v2.8.5 and during various times during the day connections to
port 25 timeout or are very slow. The majority of times this happens
is under peak loads, but even times when it's not at capacity it may
do this.
I have a
On 11/16/2011 7:56 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I built a dual-Xeon quad-core box with 8GB using fedora15 and
postfix-v2.8.5 and during various times during the day connections to
port 25 timeout or are very slow. The majority of times this happens
is under peak loads, but even times when it's not at
On 11/16/2011 01:01 PM, David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get spf going on my arch postfix server. I'm wanting to
get perl-policyd-spf going and am atempting to download the needed
source. The issue is openspf.org appears down, anyone know why or if
there's an alternative download
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +0100, gmx Ralf Hauser wrote:
Any hints how to do a client certificate authentication TLS-handshake
between IBM's v8.51 as the client and postfix/openssl on the server side
would be highly appreciated.
If you want to validate client certs, you have to ask
Hi,
I built a dual-Xeon quad-core box with 8GB using fedora15 and
postfix-v2.8.5 and during various times during the day connections to
port 25 timeout or are very slow. The majority of times this happens
is under peak loads, but even times when it's not at capacity it may
do this.
Often
55 matches
Mail list logo
