Il 19/12/2011 15.31, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Claudio Prono:
For my vacation is different, from the man page:
-tNChange the interval between repeat replies to the same
sender. N is the number of days between replies. Default is one week.
Infact, my command line is
Read the
* Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net:
Maybe is a my problem and i don't understand, but specifying -t0 is
equal to say to the vacation respond to every mail, or i am wrong?
Indeed.
If is true what i know, why the vacation don't respond?
In conclusion, vacation doing exit 0 without
Il 19/12/2011 16.39, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
* Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net:
Maybe is a my problem and i don't understand, but specifying -t0 is
equal to say to the vacation respond to every mail, or i am wrong?
Indeed.
If is true what i know, why the vacation don't respond?
* Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net:
cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t0
testmedia
OK. There are two different versions of vacation. The one that's
giving ME the best results is from Marco D'Itri. The other version
drove me mad.
Find out which one you're
Hi Patrick, die wuerden sowas machen
hab kurz mit dem telefoniert
Dr. Henning Blaufuß
Rechtsanwalt
Peters, Schönberger Partner GbR
Schackstr. 2, D-80539 München
Tel.: 089-38172-0 Fax.: 089-38172-204
E-mail: h.blauf...@psp.eu
Internet: http://www.psp.eu
wie gesagt ist ein Kunde der NCI
I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay. Both
my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7) update
their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a very similar
method as described here:
Le 2011-12-19 10:37, Claudio Prono a écrit :
Claudio Prono:
For my vacation is different, from the man page:
-tNChange the interval between repeat replies to the same
sender. N is the number of days between replies. Default is one week..
Infact, my command line is
Maybe is a my
Il 19/12/2011 16.52, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
* Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net:
cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t0
testmedia
OK. There are two different versions of vacation. The one that's
giving ME the best results is from Marco D'Itri. The
Il 19/12/2011 17.06, Pierre Girard ha scritto:
Le 2011-12-19 10:37, Claudio Prono a écrit :
Claudio Prono:
For my vacation is different, from the man page:
-tNChange the interval between repeat replies to the same
sender. N is the number of days between replies. Default is one
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net wrote:
I have thinked also to this, so i have deleted the .vacation.db, re-do
vacation -I [user] then do
cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t1
testmedia
But no way, no results at all
On 12/19/2011 9:54 AM, Who Me wrote:
I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a very
similar method as
Zitat von Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 12/19/2011 9:54 AM, Who Me wrote:
I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail
relay. Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily from
Active
I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a
very similar method as described here:
Forgot to CC
Original Message
Subject:Re: CIDR
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:27:50 +0200
From: Tolga to...@ozses.net
To: s...@hardwarefreak.com
On 18-12-2011 13:36, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/18/2011 4:49 AM, Duane Hill wrote:
Hi, I've confirmed that the IP
Tolga:
I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here
cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today, I thought I'd check logs, and one thing I
noticed is Dec 19 20:09:24 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[16163]:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail2-188.sinamail.sina.com.cn[60.28.2.188]:
451 4.3.5 Server
On 12/19/2011 12:21 PM, Who Me wrote:
I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a
very similar method as
On 12/19/2011 12:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here
cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today, I thought I'd check logs, and one thing I
noticed is Dec 19 20:09:24 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[16163]:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
On 2011-12-16 17:28, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-12-16 5:27 AM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 2011-12-13 12:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-12-13 3:11 AM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
Yes, I caught that. (But thanks for the note, anyway). I plan to
let inbox be mbox
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:54:59AM -0800, Who Me wrote:
Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily
This table is consulted *only* by smtpd(8).
On the older box, every day I see a message stating that
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:54:59AM -0800, Who Me wrote:
Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily
This table is consulted *only* by smtpd(8).
On the older box, every day I see a message stating
On 12/20/2011 02:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On 12/19/2011 5:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/19/2011 12:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
I did like you said (did a postmap -q ip.add.ress.here
cidr:sinokorea.cidr). Today,
21 matches
Mail list logo
