I need to configure a existing mail server to accept mail for another domain
until their server is replaced.
I'm currently using postfix-2.2.9-10.18, which I know is old.
Is it necessary to update the postfix first?
Thanks
Jon L Miller
m (intl):+61 0412 126 166
m (aus): 0412 126 166
On 9/24/2012 3:32 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'm running 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 as a mail relay; most of my mail is
delivered to an internal Exchange 2010 environment with two Hub
Transport machines clustered behind Windows NLB under the same
hostname.
We have the same setup, but with a more
A related question, is it possible to enforce an authenticated user to
one specific ip? I'll have to figure out how to enforce outgoing mail
to a certain ip, on a plesk machine, otherwise I'll have to get
another VPS specificly for the purpose of outgoing mail.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Marc van
Wietse Venema:
Alas, as documented tcp_table(5) is an insecure table (no secure
communication) so Postfix probably will not allow you to look up
mailbox pathnames with this.
You are right it doesn't work:
fatal: tcp:127.0.0.1:2527 map is not allowed for security sensitive data
Is there an
Jon Miller:
I need to configure a existing mail server to accept mail for
another domain until their server is replaced. I'm currently using
postfix-2.2.9-10.18, which I know is old.
Is it necessary to update the postfix first?
No, but you might need a historian to answer your questions :-)
Hi Stan,
On 09/25/2012 08:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Apparently Linux and Windows TCP window scaling doesn't always work
reliably together. Try disabling TCP window scaling on the Linux box(en):
[snip]
Perhaps off topic, but do you have any links to documents or similar
that proves that
* Mikael Bak m...@inbox.lv:
Hi Stan,
On 09/25/2012 08:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Apparently Linux and Windows TCP window scaling doesn't always work
reliably together. Try disabling TCP window scaling on the Linux box(en):
[snip]
Perhaps off topic, but do you have any links to
Feel Zhou skrev den 25-09-2012 15:56:
Sep 24 08:44:52 shcx postfix/anvil[14914]: statistics: max connection
rate 805/60s for (smtp:5.39.219.175) at Sep 24 08:38:22
Sep 24 08:44:52 shcx postfix/anvil[14914]: statistics: max connection
count 52 for (smtp:5.39.219.175) at Sep 24 08:37:33
Sep 24
On 9/25/2012 8:56 AM, Feel Zhou wrote:
/var/log/maillog
Sep 24 08:37:50 shcx postfix/smtpd[14960]: warning:
unknown[5.39.219.175]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed:
authentication failure
...
Hello My friend
Someone who want to guess username and passwd in my mail server
What I
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mikkel Bang facebookman...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/20 Anonymous nore...@breaka.net:
Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your advice I
finally ended up with:
..+ postfix-anti-UCE.txt +..
Ultimate server, or cheap server?
Hi,My friend
Thank you for Benny Pedersen and Noel Jones answer
I will try to install fail2ban to stop them next time
By the way The IP 5.39.219.175 is too bad
I just put it into hosts.deny
Thanks a lot
TOM
2012/9/25 Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
On 9/25/2012 8:56
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:30 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: sporadic bouts of lost connections to exchange 2010 hub transport
* Mikael
On 9/25/2012 12:33 PM, Aaron Bennett wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:30 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: sporadic bouts of lost
Hello list members,
Postfix keeps logging warnings like the following:
Sep 25 21:00:17 monthu postfix/smtpd[31253]: warning: hostname
monthu.horus-it.com does not resolve to address
2a01:4f8:150:54c1::b009:2bd8: No address associated with hostname
Name server queries appear to be
Ralph Seichter:
Hello list members,
Postfix keeps logging warnings like the following:
Sep 25 21:00:17 monthu postfix/smtpd[31253]: warning: hostname
monthu.horus-it.com does not resolve to address
2a01:4f8:150:54c1::b009:2bd8: No address associated with hostname
What's in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The documentation says
The address type (ipv6, ipv4 or any) that the Postfix SMTP client will
try first, when a destination has IPv6 and IPv4 addresses with equal MX
preference.
What exacly happens if example.com has
example.com. IN MX 10
Wietse wrote:
What's in /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf?
The directory /var/spool/postfix/etc does not exist on the server.
Should I create it?
Any recent upgrades that failed to update (system library or config)
files under /var/spool/postfix?
I am not aware of any failures. I've
Luigi Rosa:
The documentation says
The address type (ipv6, ipv4 or any) that the Postfix SMTP client will
try first, when a destination has IPv6 and IPv4 addresses with equal MX
preference.
What exacly happens if example.com has
example.com. IN MX 10 mail.example.com.
Ralph Seichter:
Wietse wrote:
What's in /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf?
The directory /var/spool/postfix/etc does not exist on the server.
Should I create it?
Postfix uses the getaddrinfo() and getnameinfo() system library
routines.
You used dig.
The two are not comparable.
Dne 21.9.2012 v 06:55 Wietse Venema napsal(a):
I'm viewing http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html#delivering;. The
local(8) and virtual(8) are at the same level. Why local(8) return
SMTP-error and virtual(8) generate bounce mail?
ALL Postfix delivery agents generate a bounce message upon
Wietse wrote:
Please run the attached test programs and verify that your system
library is not borked.
$ ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
Addresses: 176.9.43.216
$ ./getnameinfo 176.9.43.216
Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
Address:
Ralph Seichter:
Wietse wrote:
Please run the attached test programs and verify that your system
library is not borked.
$ ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
Addresses: 176.9.43.216
My FreeBSD system says:
% ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
Michal Kurka:
Dne 21.9.2012 v 06:55 Wietse Venema napsal(a):
I'm viewing http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html#delivering;. The
local(8) and virtual(8) are at the same level. Why local(8) return
SMTP-error and virtual(8) generate bounce mail?
ALL Postfix delivery agents generate
Gentoo Linux's default /etc/nsswitch.conf contains hosts: files dns,
and the corresponding test program output looks like this:
$ ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
Addresses: 176.9.43.216
When I change the setting to hosts: dns files, the output changes
Ralph Seichter:
Gentoo Linux's default /etc/nsswitch.conf contains hosts: files dns,
and the corresponding test program output looks like this:
$ ./getaddrinfo monthu.horus-it.com
Hostname: monthu.horus-it.com
Addresses: 176.9.43.216
When I change the setting to hosts: dns
Noel Jones wrote:
To add a bcc: address for a specific sender+recipient combination,
you could use a restriction class that checks for that condition and
documentation:
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
A more flexible and scalable
On 9/25/2012 8:29 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mikael Bak m...@inbox.lv:
Hi Stan,
On 09/25/2012 08:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Apparently Linux and Windows TCP window scaling doesn't always work
reliably together. Try disabling TCP window scaling on the Linux box(en):
[snip]
Perhaps
Yea, I hear ya on the historian, but you know clients if it's not broken
dont fix it
I'm wondering how much of a nightmare it would be to upgrade from this
version to the latest and if there are any gotcha I need to be aware of?
Jon
--
From:
28 matches
Mail list logo