Re: Question about forwarding and SPAM checking

2012-10-04 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 04.10.2012 02:40, schrieb Dave Lewis - Mailinglist: Let me add to this question since I’ve been digging further, and racking my brain for a simple solution. If you have postfix with postfixadmin , mysql, spamassassin, maildrop configured and working where it is calling the default

Re: Catch-all problem

2012-10-04 Thread Wietse Venema
DN Singh: [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] Hello group, I want to implement a catch-all address on my system. This is a very simple setup where the users are system users. Hence, the unrouted mail should go to user bounce. After searching documentation I implemented

Re: Catch-all problem

2012-10-04 Thread Ram
On 10/04/2012 04:30 PM, DN Singh wrote: Hello group, I want to implement a catch-all address on my system. This is a very simple setup where the users are system users. Hence, the unrouted mail should go to user bounce. After searching documentation I implemented virtual_alias_maps. But,

Re: AW: How to change queue id?

2012-10-04 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 10/3/2012 4:30 PM, Steffen Schebesta wrote: Thanks for all the insightful answers. So, I actually use the long_queue_ids options and I save the queue_ids to a database to later compare them to the queue_ids found in the mail log to parse and mark the bounces. The problem - and thus the

Re: AW: How to change queue id?

2012-10-04 Thread Wietse Venema
Steffen Schebesta: If that doesn't work though then maybe I could work around this problem. I thought about adding the message-id to the bounce message but that probably Postfix has lots of options to identify a returned message. 1) You can encode the unique identifier in the envelope sender

Re: recipient bcc - SOLVED

2012-10-04 Thread Jason Hirsh
dovecot on the server i also don't see these commands; alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases mailbox_command local_recipient_maps I was not using those in postfix take some time and read what they do. you should at least specify system root and

RE: AW: How to change queue id?

2012-10-04 Thread Steffen Schebesta
Hello Wietse, option 1 is actually a pretty good idea - hadn't thought of this. The disadvantage of handling the return mail is that not only bounces are returned but also automatic responders, etc. and thus I would have to parse the content of the email to find out if it is a real bounce. So I

Re: Catch-all problem

2012-10-04 Thread DN Singh
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote: On 10/04/2012 04:30 PM, DN Singh wrote: Hello group, I want to implement a catch-all address on my system. This is a very simple setup where the users are system users. Hence, the unrouted mail should go to user bounce. After

Re: Catch-all problem

2012-10-04 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/4/2012 6:09 AM, Ram wrote: On 10/04/2012 04:30 PM, DN Singh wrote: Hello group, I want to implement a catch-all address on my system. This is a very simple setup where the users are system users. Hence, the unrouted mail should go to user bounce. After searching documentation I

Re: recipient bcc - SOLVED

2012-10-04 Thread mouss
Le 04/10/2012 15:02, Jason Hirsh a écrit : dovecot on the server i also don't see these commands; alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases mailbox_command local_recipient_maps I was not using those in postfix take some time and read what they do. you