Re: warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-06 Thread jugree
and for the above to /work/ dovecot needs to offer a non-plaintext mechanism, such as CRAM-MD5. I would strongly suggest removing the noplaintext keyword during testing. Can it be used on a regular basis (i.e., not just for testing)? Will it be better to enable a non-plaintext mechanism?

Re: How to stop smtp servers to send us emails

2012-12-06 Thread Wietse Venema
Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD: /etc/postfix$ grep iglobe.be * client-blacklist:.iglobe.be REJECT 555 Spam not tolerated Why do you have a '.' before the domain? Where is this documented? Wietse

problem receiving from mx.191.biz

2012-12-06 Thread Giuseppe De Nicolo'
Hi all, I have received a complaint from a customer thats sit on our server(postconf down below ) about not receiving a message from a particular sender domain @olmar.191.it since it was unable to receive the mail , my customer did supply an alternate address ( not managed by us )

Re: problem receiving from mx.191.biz

2012-12-06 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 06/12/2012 13:08, Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote: Hi all, I have received a complaint from a customer thats sit on our server(postconf down below ) about not receiving a message from a particular sender domain @olmar.191.it Your customer in not able to receive emails from

Re: warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-06 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/6/2012 4:54 AM, jug...@lavabit.com wrote: and for the above to /work/ dovecot needs to offer a non-plaintext mechanism, such as CRAM-MD5. I would strongly suggest removing the noplaintext keyword during testing. Can it be used on a regular basis (i.e., not just for testing)? Yes,

Re: problem receiving from mx.191.biz

2012-12-06 Thread Giuseppe De Nicolo'
On 12/06/2012 01:27 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: On 06/12/2012 13:08, Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote: Hi all, I have received a complaint from a customer thats sit on our server(postconf down below ) about not receiving a message from a particular sender domain @olmar.191.it Your

Re: How to stop smtp servers to send us emails

2012-12-06 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/5/2012 11:22 PM, Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD wrote: Hi Everyone, On 01/12/12 18:19, Noel Jones wrote: On 12/1/2012 11:11 AM, PGR wrote: Hi Everyone, I would like to know how to stop/forbid this server to send us their emails The content of received email is Received: from

Re: Bounces back to myself

2012-12-06 Thread Muzaffer Tolga Özses
On 12/05/2012 03:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: Muzaffer Tolga Özses skrev den 04-12-2012 09:10: mydestination = localhost try using it as default, comment it in main.cf if it still loops then recipient domain is missing in mysql virtual_mailbox_domains virtual_alias_maps =

Re: problem receiving from mx.191.biz

2012-12-06 Thread Jim Wright
On Dec 6, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote: the mx responsible for this domain is mx.191.biz ( Telecom Italia - God save us all ) I checked my server logs for any evidence of this grep mx.191.biz /var/log/maillog* and this is the output : /var/log/maillog.1:Nov 27 12:42:22

Re: Bounces back to myself

2012-12-06 Thread mouss
Le 06/12/2012 14:58, Muzaffer Tolga Özses a écrit : On 12/05/2012 03:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: Muzaffer Tolga Özses skrev den 04-12-2012 09:10: mydestination = localhost try using it as default, comment it in main.cf if it still loops then recipient domain is missing in mysql

Holding Email from Specific Sender

2012-12-06 Thread Dan Lists
We relay email for our customers. They had some accounts Phished. I wanted to hold email from those users so I could see the spam that was going out and requeue the valid email. In main.cf I have: smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:$config_directory/sender_domains,

Re: Holding Email from Specific Sender

2012-12-06 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/6/2012 4:29 PM, Dan Lists wrote: We relay email for our customers. They had some accounts Phished. I wanted to hold email from those users so I could see the spam that was going out and requeue the valid email. In main.cf I have: smtpd_sender_restrictions =

Re: Holding Email from Specific Sender

2012-12-06 Thread Dan Lists
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 12/6/2012 4:29 PM, Dan Lists wrote: We relay email for our customers. They had some accounts Phished. I wanted to hold email from those users so I could see the spam that was going out and requeue the valid email.

Re: Holding Email from Specific Sender

2012-12-06 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/6/2012 5:26 PM, Dan Lists wrote: On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 12/6/2012 4:29 PM, Dan Lists wrote: We relay email for our customers. They had some accounts Phished. I wanted to hold email from those users so I could see the spam that was

SASL auth and (local) relaying through telnet

2012-12-06 Thread Titanus Eramius
I'm not entirely sure how to formulate this question best in English, so please bear over with me. In the past 6 months I've set up several Postfix 2.7.1 servers, which uses Dovecot as LDA and as SASL auth. One of them runs this domain, but they are still in testing. My highest concern is to

Re: SASL auth and (local) relaying through telnet

2012-12-06 Thread Wietse Venema
Titanus Eramius: However, trying to learn a little I played around with telnet from my computer today, and was able to relay mail through the servers from the internet, without having to log in. Most Postfix configurations use permit_mynetworks which by default allows relaying from local

Re: SASL auth and (local) relaying through telnet

2012-12-06 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:23:21AM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote: My highest concern is to setup an open relay by accident, so in the process I've used an online anti-spam tester several times: http://www.antispam-ufrj.pads.ufrj.br/test-relay.html That need not be your highest concern. It has

Re: warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-06 Thread jugree
I would strongly suggest removing the noplaintext keyword during testing. Thank you. It worked. There is no best, there is only what fits your needs. I expect it's common to specify smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous and then after

Re: warning:xsasl_cyrus_server_get_mechanism_list: no applicable SASL mechanisms

2012-12-06 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/6/2012 9:54 PM, jug...@lavabit.com wrote: common to specify smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous and then after verifying that SASL works, adding smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes Does it mean that my session will be encrypted using TLS,

Re: SASL auth and (local) relaying through telnet

2012-12-06 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/6/2012 6:23 PM, Titanus Eramius wrote: My highest concern is to setup an open relay by accident, so in the ... A telnet session goes like this, on either the server containing my_address or the backup MX: $ telnet X.X.X.X 25 ... $ MAIL FROM:s...@dont-exists.tld 250 2.1.0 Ok $ RCPT

Re: How to stop smtp servers to send us emails

2012-12-06 Thread Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD
Hi Wietse, On 06/12/12 12:52, Wietse Venema wrote: Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD: /etc/postfix$ grep iglobe.be * client-blacklist:.iglobe.be REJECT 555 Spam not tolerated Why do you have a '.' before the domain? Where is this documented? Wietse Found on many posts explaining how to build

Redirecting queued messages

2012-12-06 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a border SMTP server that has some local mailbox and relays other recipients to an internal Exchange server Relay to Exchange is done via transport file with something like this: exchange.acme.com relay:[10.10.10.10] Old Exchange