Wietse Venema:
Don't use spamcop, or use it only with small weight in a scoring
system. Wietse
What is your concern about Spamcop?
Happy to learn,
Jos
Jos Chrispijn:
Wietse Venema:
Don't use spamcop, or use it only with small weight in a scoring
system. Wietse
What is your concern about Spamcop?
Read their blocklist policy.
I use it, thusly:
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org*2
bl.spamcop.net*1
Don't use spamcop, or use it only with small weight in a scoring system.
I agree that Spamcop used to be awful, with vast numbers of false
alarms. But since Ironport bought them several years ago, there's
been a nearly complete turnover of staff and it's much better run.
Take another look. I
On 1/6/2013 11:29 AM, John Levine wrote:
Don't use spamcop, or use it only with small weight in a scoring system.
I agree that Spamcop used to be awful, with vast numbers of false
alarms. But since Ironport bought them several years ago, there's
been a nearly complete turnover of staff and
On 01/06/2013 12:29 PM, John Levine wrote:
Don't use spamcop, or use it only with small weight in a scoring system.
I agree that Spamcop used to be awful, with vast numbers of false
alarms. But since Ironport bought them several years ago, there's
been a nearly complete turnover of staff and
On 1/6/2013 6:18 PM, Ron Guerin wrote:
On 01/06/2013 12:29 PM, John Levine wrote:
Don't use spamcop, or use it only with small weight in a scoring system.
I agree that Spamcop used to be awful, with vast numbers of false
alarms. But since Ironport bought them several years ago, there's
been
