Hi all
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf: unknown smtpd restriction: reject_unauth_destionation
Then in the maillog appears other errors, I think not related to above:
/proxymap[9105]: error: open /etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf:
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf: unknown smtpd restriction:
reject_unauth_destionation
ouch - this was a dangerous typo
Then in the maillog appears other errors, I think not related to above:
and why do you reply off-list?
Am 19.02.2013 10:36, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 19/02/2013 11:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf: unknown smtpd restriction:
On 19/02/2013 11:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why do you reply off-list?
Am 19.02.2013 10:36, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 19/02/2013 11:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf:
On 19/02/2013 11:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why do you reply off-list?
Am 19.02.2013 10:36, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 19/02/2013 11:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 10:04, schrieb Birta Levente:
Today I restarted the postfix server because one misconfiguration in the
master.cf:
Am 19.02.2013 12:00, schrieb Birta Levente:
OK, after a look up in $daemon_directory/postfix-files I see the
$config_directory need 0755 permission ... but
main was 0644 ...
well, directories always need 755/750/700 instead 644/640/600
why worked until now ... i don't now ...
because the
Thinking about this, I might have been to specific in my question.
At the fundamental level I would like to have 2 or more Postfix servers
capable of receiving virtual mail for multiple domains, where one of
the servers also handles relaying and local delivery. The rest should
function as backup
I have transport front-end servers for domains:
domain1.tld
domain2.tld
domain3.tld
domain4.tld
[..]
domainX.tld
I want to blacklist 1.2.3.4/24 only for destination domain3.tld (and
reply with a 5xx if possible).
What's the best way to handle this? On the backend server somewhere?
But the
Richard,
On 02/19/2013 12:34 PM, richard lucassen wrote:
I have transport front-end servers for domains:
domain1.tld
domain2.tld
domain3.tld
domain4.tld
[..]
domainX.tld
I want to blacklist 1.2.3.4/24 only for destination domain3.tld (and
reply with a 5xx if possible).
What's the
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:54:42 +0100
Mikael Bak m...@inbox.lv wrote:
I want to blacklist 1.2.3.4/24 only for destination domain3.tld (and
reply with a 5xx if possible).
What's the best way to handle this? On the backend server somewhere?
But the backend server receives the mail from the
richard lucassen skrev den 2013-02-19 12:34:
Any hint?
google postfwd
postfix can do it with classes, but its more complicated then with
postfwd
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:49:54 +0100
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
Any hint?
google postfwd
postfix can do it with classes, but its more complicated then with
postfwd
Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on the
backend server. I'd prefer not to touch the
richard lucassen skrev den 2013-02-19 13:58:
Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on the
backend server. I'd prefer not to touch the front-end servers.
then use the ha-proxy on front end, and postfwd on backend
could you remove email addr in reply template ? (@ does
On 02/19/2013 01:58 PM, richard lucassen wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:49:54 +0100
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
Any hint?
google postfwd
postfix can do it with classes, but its more complicated then with
postfwd
Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:21:35PM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
I've tried with relay_domains, but it matches on domain-level which is
too much. I then applied relay_recipient_maps, but it don't seem to
have any effect, which means that addresses is still matched on domain
basis.
Every
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:07:43 +0100
Mikael Bak m...@inbox.lv wrote:
Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on the
backend server. I'd prefer not to touch the front-end servers.
That does NOT sound like a good idea.
If you accept the message on the fronend and then
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:58 +0100
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
richard lucassen skrev den 2013-02-19 13:58:
Ok, that seems to be very nice. AFAIUI it can be implemented on the
backend server. I'd prefer not to touch the front-end servers.
then use the ha-proxy on front end, and
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 13:13:54 +0100, Miha Valencic wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
HOLD acts at the message level, not the recipient level.
If one recipient of a multi-recipient message is put on HOLD, all
recipients of that message will be
18 matches
Mail list logo