- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Phil Daws ux...@splatnix.net
Cc: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org, postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Monday, 22 July, 2013 1:19:43 AM
Subject: Re: Postscreen
Phil Daws:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
No
Phil Daws:
In the end I followed what somebody else had said with:
touch /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache
postmap btree:/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache
chown postfix.postfix /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache
service postfix restart
For the record, this should not be necessary if redistributors could
resist the
Hello list,
Thanks for the info, in a different thread I also saw a reference to
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/smtpd-recipient-restrictions-Best-Practices-td10171.html and it helped me to modify my config. In addition I upgraded to Postfix 2.9.3 because I want to start using
On 7/22/2013 10:21 AM, L.W. van Braam van Vloten wrote:
Hello list,
Thanks for the info, in a different thread I also saw a reference to
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/smtpd-recipient-restrictions-Best-Practices-td10171.html
and it helped me to modify my config. In addition I upgraded
On 07/21/2013 12:23 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 05:18:58PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
/dev/rob0:
The doubt in my mind about this is for mail truly destined to
our hosted domains. It resolves to an Internet (not an internal)
IP address which is in the MX instance's
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:51:37PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Why would you not allow submission to deliver to the hosted
domains ? You can simply add the maps to the existing ones
you use (if any).
The point is that we can never be sure that we actually do host any
given domain. Suppose a
This is a clone of the production site, for QA and testing. This being
QA, whenever we run a test of our software, we don't want our test suite
to go ahead and blast the Internet with lots of random email messages.
OTOH, we need to keep the configuration of the QA site as close to
production
Hi,
Thanks for your clear reply, that really helps!
One last question: How should I configure local_recipient_maps?
Noel said:
local_recipient_maps =
An empty local_recipient_maps will cause your postfix to accept mail
for undeliverable local address, then attempt to bounce
Florin Andrei:
This is a clone of the production site, for QA and testing. This being
QA, whenever we run a test of our software, we don't want our test suite
to go ahead and blast the Internet with lots of random email messages.
OTOH, we need to keep the configuration of the QA site as
On 7/22/2013 4:27 PM, L.W. van Braam van Vloten wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your clear reply, that really helps!
One last question: How should I configure local_recipient_maps?
The default setting of
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
should be appropriate for the vast
Okay, let's try this:
The goal is to send most emails to local, send most mydomain.com
recipients to a relay nearby, and let foobardomain.com senders go out on
the Internet freely.
In main.cf I have:
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps =
regexp:/etc/postfix/sender_transport
In
Florin Andrei:
Okay, let's try this:
The goal is to send most emails to local, send most mydomain.com
recipients to a relay nearby, and let foobardomain.com senders go out on
the Internet freely.
Presumably, if foobardomain.com senders send mail to local or
mydomain.com recipients, then
On 07/22/2013 05:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Florin Andrei:
The goal is to send most emails to local, send most mydomain.com
recipients to a relay nearby, and let foobardomain.com senders go out on
the Internet freely.
Presumably, if foobardomain.com senders send mail to local or
Florin Andrei:
On 07/22/2013 05:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Florin Andrei:
The goal is to send most emails to local, send most mydomain.com
recipients to a relay nearby, and let foobardomain.com senders go out on
the Internet freely.
Presumably, if foobardomain.com senders send mail
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 03:45:35PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
They don't have hairpin NAT set up, whereby if I try to connect to
this NATed IP address it would go to the router and come back to me.
I'm fine with that, actually; while that would solve the instant
problem, it could be bad in
15 matches
Mail list logo