On 8/14/2013 11:05 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>
> On 14 Aug 2013, at 20:34 , LuKreme wrote:
>
>> So, I think to myself, let's try this dovecot thing again.
>
> Well, I got it sorted. Man, this is not a fun time with conflicting
> documentation and lots of incomplete info out there.
>
> However, I am
On 8/14/2013 9:34 PM, LuKreme wrote:
> OK, so the old mailserver that I was not allowed to updated much or run ports
> on because of the fear it would die up and died today. Overall, though it's
> been hours of restoring from backup and compiling this is still good news
> because everything is g
On 14 Aug 2013, at 20:34 , LuKreme wrote:
> So, I think to myself, let's try this dovecot thing again.
Well, I got it sorted. Man, this is not a fun time with conflicting
documentation and lots of incomplete info out there.
However, I am still having one issue.
Some users are local (/usr/hom
OK, so the old mailserver that I was not allowed to updated much or run ports
on because of the fear it would die up and died today. Overall, though it's
been hours of restoring from backup and compiling this is still good news
because everything is getting built onto FreeBSD 9.2 and at current
Hi everyone,
Just wondering how to go about something:
Currently, I have a table with thousands of polygons (rectangles). I can query
the table to see which of them contains a given point (lat/lng). With the
resulting rectangle, I further need to determine *where* in the rectangle the
given po
Philippe Bloix:
> In fact, it's not easy to contact some receivers who is rate limiting,
> then in theses cases the goal is to reduce the rate per sec (about 10 mails
> per domain per sec); i'm astonished that postfix (without addons) is not
> allowed to do that but at best only 1 mail per domain
On 8/14/2013 10:12 AM, Philippe Bloix wrote:
> Of course it's easy to contact our customers!
> But in some cases, it can be difficult to contact the mail provider of our
> customers in order to ask to belong to their whitelist...
If this is truly the case and this is legitimate transactional mail,
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de :
> >* Do I need tls_preempt_cipherlist = yes, and thus Postfix 2.8.0 or not?
>
> This let the *server* (Postfix) choose a cipher suggested by the
> client, so it depends. If the client has no DH ciphers it doesn't
> help, if the client list DH ciphers later in the list Post
Hi,
> there is no mailHost attribute in ldap (or *any* attribute that is the
> "next hop" dns name). I need to map an attribute in ldap to something that
> *isn't* in ldap.
You could define transports with the names from LDAP as SMTP transports
in master.cf and then use these names from within y
there is no mailHost attribute in ldap (or *any* attribute that is the
"next hop" dns name). I need to map an attribute in ldap to something that
*isn't* in ldap.
(yes, this could be done with ldap modifications (and probably will have to
be). I'd just like to confirm that I can't do it without)
Hello,
I have a small mail server, with ipv6 and i relay the email to my ISP
mail server. Their mail server have now ipv6, yet every time my
postfix tries to connect to their server it gives timeout:
Aug 13 12:51:27 paquete postfix/smtp[25083]: SSL_connect error to
smtp.sapo.pt[2001:8a0:2104:ff
On Aug 14, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Jonathan Engbrecht wrote:
> We have an attribute in our ldap that I'd like to use to determine the "next
> hop" for mail transport. The attribute is not itself the name of the next
> transport.
>
> Is there a way to set up a mapping for this?
>
> ie:
>
> dn:
On 8/14/2013 10:21 AM, Grant wrote:
>>> A few people have told me they received an email error message after
>>> emailing me. I'm trying to get a copy of one of the error emails,
>>> but I can't imagine what would cause that besides possibly my
>>> greylisting. Has greylisting been known to lead
We have an attribute in our ldap that I'd like to use to determine the
"next hop" for mail transport. The attribute is not itself the name of the
next transport.
Is there a way to set up a mapping for this?
ie:
dn: xxx...
routingattribute: foo
route messages with this attribute to smtp:bar.c
On 2013-08-14 11:24 AM, Grant wrote:
You were right, I'm using postscreen and deep protocol checks.
Turn them off (did you read the warnings associated with enabling them?)...
--
Best regards,
*/Charles /*
>> A few people have told me they received an email error message
>> after emailing me. I'm trying to get a copy of one of the error
>> emails, but I can't imagine what would cause that besides possibly
>> my greylisting. Has greylisting been known to lead to email error
>> messages being sent to
>> A few people have told me they received an email error message after
>> emailing me. I'm trying to get a copy of one of the error emails,
>> but I can't imagine what would cause that besides possibly my
>> greylisting. Has greylisting been known to lead to email error
>> messages being sent to
Of course it's easy to contact our customers!
But in some cases, it can be difficult to contact the mail provider of our
customers in order to ask to belong to their whitelist...
PB
2013/8/14 Stan Hoeppner
> On 8/14/2013 7:14 AM, Philippe Bloix wrote:
> > Thanks for your response
> >
> > I'm no
On 8/14/2013 7:14 AM, Philippe Bloix wrote:
> Thanks for your response
>
> I'm not a spammer :-), i'm working in a telecom firm where we send emails
> to our customers.
Ok, so you're a telecom company and the receivers in question are your
customers.
> In fact, it's not easy to contact some rec
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:23:11AM -0700, Grant wrote:
> A few people have told me they received an email error message
> after emailing me. I'm trying to get a copy of one of the error
> emails, but I can't imagine what would cause that besides possibly
> my greylisting. Has greylisting been
On 8/14/2013 7:14 AM, Philippe Bloix wrote:
> Thanks for your response
>
> I'm not a spammer :-), i'm working in a telecom firm where we send
> emails to our customers.
> In fact, it's not easy to contact some receivers who is rate
> limiting, then in theses cases the goal is to reduce the rate
Hi,
We are running Postfix on a Solaris server.
On the anvil man page it says:
To register a new connection send the following request to
the anvil(8) server:
request=connect
ident=string
The anvil(8) server answers with
Thanks for your response
I'm not a spammer :-), i'm working in a telecom firm where we send emails
to our customers.
In fact, it's not easy to contact some receivers who is rate limiting,
then in theses cases the goal is to reduce the rate per sec (about 10 mails
per domain per sec); i'm astonish
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
What exactly are the prerequisites for "preferring" EDH ciphers in
Postfix?
* Do I need ECC (and thus OpenSSL >= 1.0.0) or not?
For EDH no, for ECDHE yes
* Do I need tls_preempt_cipherlist = yes, and thus Postfix 2.8.0 or not?
This let the *server* (Postfix)
On 8/14/2013 5:23 AM, Grant wrote:
> A few people have told me they received an email error message after
> emailing me. I'm trying to get a copy of one of the error emails,
> but I can't imagine what would cause that besides possibly my
> greylisting. Has greylisting been known to lead to email
!-- On Wed 14.Aug'13 at 11:23:11 BST, Grant (emailgr...@gmail.com), wrote:
> A few people have told me they received an email error message after
> emailing me. I'm trying to get a copy of one of the error emails, but I
> can't imagine what would cause that besides possibly my greylisting. Has
>
What exactly are the prerequisites for "preferring" EDH ciphers in
Postfix?
* Do I need ECC (and thus OpenSSL >= 1.0.0) or not?
* Do I need tls_preempt_cipherlist = yes, and thus Postfix 2.8.0 or not?
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz
A few people have told me they received an email error message after
emailing me. I'm trying to get a copy of one of the error emails, but I
can't imagine what would cause that besides possibly my greylisting. Has
greylisting been known to lead to email error messages being sent to
senders in som
Thank you for your response.
I'm not administrator of all submission servers then i'm not allowed to set
"retry interval"on some application servers.
I thought about putting on hold all the mails but my goal is to send about
10 mails per domain per second but it's quite difficult to implement with
Hi,
Am 2013-08-13 18:10, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
On Aug 13, 2013, at 17:34, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/13/2013 10:26 AM, Philippe Bloix wrote:
What i would like is :
For example, my postfix relay accepts about 1000 emails (1 shot)
from a SMTP client, then the postfix server relays them with th
On 8/13/2013 7:43 AM, Philippe Bloix wrote:
> I would like to set a limit rate per domain. I know i can use
> « destination_rate_delay » and it works ! The problem is that the minimum
> period is 1s. It permits to send 1 email per domain per second .
>
> If i want to send for example 5 emails per
31 matches
Mail list logo
