On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:21:06PM -0500, Andy Howell wrote:
> I'm trying to setup amavis. I can't connect from postfix on port
> 10025, configured as:
>
> localhost:10025 inet n-n--smtpd -vv
Make that 127.0.0.1:10025, and drop off the -vv
snip
> -o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/
I'm trying to setup amavis. I can't connect from postfix on port 10025,
configured as:
localhost:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd -vv
-o content_filter=
-o smtpd_delay_reject=no
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject
-o smtpd_helo_restrictions=
-
I guess you are right. It looks like a second didn't go by, before
the message got on a queue. Is that right? I had previously
understood that in delays=a/b/c/d c is time elapsed from hand off from
client to queue.
Oct 29 16:56:39 pmx1 postfix/smtpd[7978]: EF7454059D:
client=unknown[192.168.0.2
Am 29.10.2013 22:08, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
> Sorry about that one. In fact, the other address was unreachable
> than. Please, keep in mind, it is the hand off from thunderbird to
> postfix I am interested in.
>
> Here is a good example.
>
> Oct 29 16:57:10 pmx1 postfix/smtp[8024]: EF7454059D
Sorry about that one. In fact, the other address was unreachable
than. Please, keep in mind, it is the hand off from thunderbird to
postfix I am interested in.
Here is a good example.
Oct 29 16:57:10 pmx1 postfix/smtp[8024]: EF7454059D:
to=,
relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.68.26]:25,
Am 29.10.2013 21:55, schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
> Am 29.10.2013 21:46, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>> How did you decide this is a network issue?
>
> Connection timed out?
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ telnet 96.57.168.248 25
Trying 96.57.168.248...
telnet: connect to address 96.57.168.248: Connection timed
Am 29.10.2013 21:46, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
> How did you decide this is a network issue?
Connection timed out?
> How would you go about determining which router which switch?
it's hard to explain how to debug network issues
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:33 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>
Am 29.10.2013 21:25, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
> The client is thunderbird. Correct me if I am wrong, it appears it 40
> seconds for the client to hand over the email to the server? If so,
> where should I troubleshoot? are there maintenance
> tasks/configuration changes to improve this situation
How did you decide this is a network issue?
How would you go about determining which router which switch?
Thanks for your help.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:33 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.10.2013 21:25, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>> The client is thunderbird. Correct me if I am wrong, it
Am 29.10.2013 21:27, schrieb LuKreme:
> On 29 Oct 2013, at 09:26 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>> one reason more why soeone should use LMTP these days
>> besides possible security problems and bad performance
>> by starting a new process for each delivery
>
> I'm not sure I understand.
you don't
On 29 Oct 2013, at 09:26 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> one reason more why soeone should use LMTP these days
> besides possible security problems and bad performance
> by starting a new process for each delivery
I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that this a reason to use LMTP, but
that LMTP
The client is thunderbird. Correct me if I am wrong, it appears it 40
seconds for the client to hand over the email to the server? If so,
where should I troubleshoot? are there maintenance
tasks/configuration changes to improve this situation.
BTW... from the inception there was no or negligibl
On 10/29/2013 2:55 PM, Steffan A. Cline wrote:
> I am working with a server that has CentOS 5 which uses Virtualmin to
> configure the server. I run a similar configuration with no issues. When
> DocuSign sends us a message, the maillog has this in it:
>
> Oct 29 12:09:32 saguarogold postfix/smtpd
Steffan A. Cline skrev den 2013-10-29 20:55:
I am working with a server that has CentOS 5 which uses Virtualmin to
configure the server. I run a similar configuration with no issues.
When
DocuSign sends us a message, the maillog has this in it:
Oct 29 12:09:32 saguarogold postfix/smtpd[10387]:
I am working with a server that has CentOS 5 which uses Virtualmin to
configure the server. I run a similar configuration with no issues. When
DocuSign sends us a message, the maillog has this in it:
Oct 29 12:09:32 saguarogold postfix/smtpd[10387]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from mailch.docusign.net[2
On 29 Oct 2013, at 09:13 , Wietse Venema wrote:
> % egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /some/log/file | more
I forgot about warning and checked egrep '(fatal|panic|error)'
warning: pipe flag `D' requires dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
So, there's that.
Thanks.
--
'I don't see wh
Am 29.10.2013 16:23, schrieb LuKreme:
> On 29 Oct 2013, at 09:13 , Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> % egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /some/log/file | more
>
> I forgot about warning and checked egrep '(fatal|panic|error)'
>
> warning: pipe flag `D' requires dovecot_destination_recipient_limit
LuKreme:
> Oct 25 12:04:56 mail postfix/pipe[63645]: 0ACEB50D7BD:
> to=<*user1*@example.com>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.7, delays=0.67/0.02/0/0.02,
> dsn=4.3.5, status=deferred (mail system configuration error)
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
[...]
When Postfix does not receive o
This is the original injection of the mail:
Oct 25 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[63496]: 0ACEB50D7BD:
client=mail-wg0-f46.google.com[74.125.82.46]
Oct 25 12:04:56 mail postfix/cleanup[63497]: 0ACEB50D7BD:
message-id=
proto=ESMTP helo=: Subject
Oct 25 12:04:56 mail postfix/qmgr[86756]: 0ACEB50D7BD:
On 28/10/2013 18:36, Tim Legg wrote:
Attached is the postconf -n
I've also been reading the link that Dr. Venema sent me. Could it be
that the mydestination is incorrect? Could it be:
mydestination = timothy.com, localhost.localdomain, localhost
The above is what you need in order for yo
20 matches
Mail list logo
