On 2014-10-23 16:27, Noel Jones wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/23/2014 8:32 AM, Patrik Båt wrote:
Hello!
*main.cf config:* smtp_tls_policy_maps =
hash:/etc/postfix/maps/tls_policy transport_maps =
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql/relay-transport.cf
Hi,
In c67094e5-49db-40bc-98ba-8bdc82b25...@mehnle.net
Postfix/milter benchmarking on Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:45:06 -0700,
Julian Mehnle jul...@mehnle.net wrote:
I'm developing a new milter and I need to benchmark it when plugged into
Postfix. What are my best options for generating an SMTP
Dear postfix users,
today we discovered a problem with one of our mailrelays. Maillog
contains lines like the following:
Oct 23 10:53:00 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/pickup[11413]: [ID 947731
mail.warning] warning: maildrop/6B8F696F6: error writing 2737698C0: no
recipients specified
Looking
* Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org [2014-10-24 00:36]:
I tried to implement this by using a check_recipient_access pcre_table
like this:
/etc/postfix# cat recipient_access.pcre
/^postfix-reject-address@.+$/ REJECT
This must match the recipient address as sent by the client and
Jan P. Kessler:
Dear postfix users,
today we discovered a problem with one of our mailrelays. Maillog
contains lines like the following:
Oct 23 10:53:00 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/pickup[11413]: [ID 947731
mail.warning] warning: maildrop/6B8F696F6: error writing 2737698C0: no
recipients
Sebastian Wiesinger:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access
proxy:mysql:$config_directory/sql/mysql_check_recipient_access.cf,
...
(Also I had to extend proxy_read_maps for this).
Argh. I forgot to include that in the default
Oct 23 10:53:00 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/pickup[11413]: [ID 947731
mail.warning] warning: maildrop/6B8F696F6: error writing 2737698C0: no
recipients specified
The Postfix sendmail command awas invoked with no recipients on the
command line, and (with -t) with no recipients in the message header.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
# egrep 6B8F696F6|2737698C0 /var/log/maillog
Oct 23 10:46:58 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/smtpd[1020]: [ID 197553 mail.info]
6B8F696F6: client=mail-la0-f45.google.com[209.85.215.45]
Oct 23 10:46:58 rv-smtpext-201
A maildrop queue file is created when something submits mail with
the Postfix sendmail command, or when a maildrop queue file is
renamed from the incoming/active/deferred queue with the postsuper
-r command.
Local submission:
sendmail command command-postdrop command-maildrop queue file-
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:24:13AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
A maildrop queue file is created when something submits mail with
the Postfix sendmail command, or when a maildrop queue file is
renamed from the incoming/active/deferred queue with the postsuper
-r command.
Local submission:
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:24:13AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
A maildrop queue file is created when something submits mail with
the Postfix sendmail command, or when a maildrop queue file is
renamed from the incoming/active/deferred queue with the postsuper
-r command.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:14:59AM +0200, Patrik B?t wrote:
Another question, if I do the lookup of transport in transport_maps, I
can't use the domain in tls_policy_map?
As documented, the lookup key for TLS policy is the smtp nexthop.
Sometimes the nexthop is the recipient domain, other
Viktor:
TOO MUCH MANUAL QUEUE MANAGEMENT.
Wietse:
So I speculate that what you see was the result of a postsuper -r
race condition.
Thanks! That was it. A colleague told me, that the queue on that system
and a subsequent content filter had been congested and users were
waiting
Jan P. Kessler:
Viktor:
TOO MUCH MANUAL QUEUE MANAGEMENT.
Just one more question: Looking at the queue directories, I found:
# find /var/spool/postfix/defer -type f|wc -l
13532
Bleh.
While postqueue sais:
# postqueue -p
Mail queue is empty
Is this also a consequence of too
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
Regards
--
-
_
Am 24.10.2014 um 20:47 schrieb Julio Cesar Covolato:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
not a
Julio Cesar Covolato:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
You don't want to do
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:41:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that
On 10/24/2014 2:47 PM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:22 schrieb Mike Cardwell:
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:41:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:41 schrieb Rod K:
On 10/24/2014 2:47 PM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k
Mike Cardwell:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:41:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:42:27PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:56 schrieb Mike Cardwell:
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:42:27PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to
Mike Cardwell:
If a user attempts to send more email than they are allowed to and the mail
server starts rejecting it and the users code doesn't handle this case, then
from the shared hosting companies point of view, it is a problem at the
users end.
In that case, Postfix can require that the
On 10/24/2014 4:47 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:41 schrieb Rod K:
On 10/24/2014 2:47 PM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:04:18PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
the problem is that a website script can't handle a temporary reject
That's not true.
it is true - period
nobody right in his brain implements a mail queue in a scripting
language like PHP where the script just get
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:09:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
If a user attempts to send more email than they are allowed to and the mail
server starts rejecting it and the users code doesn't handle this case, then
from the shared hosting companies point of view, it is a problem at the
Am 25.10.2014 um 00:28 schrieb Mike Cardwell:
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:04:18PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
and so you end in lose random mails if for whatever reason the app exceeds
the limits
Web-apps that weren't written to handle retries, don't handle retries. I'll
agree with
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:51:42PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
I did this for a shared hosting system about ten years ago using the
ident functionality in Exim. I installed a local ident daemon and
then configured Exim to talk to it. Once Exim knew the user, it could
apply user-level
I've known for many years that Messagelabs, now part of Symantec,
requests a valid client certificate from a narrow list of CAs if you
want to use starttls with their servers, at least *.eu.messaglelabs.com.
This effectively kills off the use of any self-signed, expired and
invalid certificates.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 01:13:38AM +0200, Per Thorsheim wrote:
I've known for many years that Messagelabs, now part of Symantec,
requests a valid client certificate from a narrow list of CAs if you
want to use starttls with their servers, at least *.eu.messaglelabs.com.
Can you explain what
32 matches
Mail list logo
