Re: Minor grammar mistake in man 5 postconf

2018-01-08 Thread J Doe
> On Jan 8, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > J Doe: >> This should be changed to: >> >>?When this constraint is violated, or any of the digest records are >> malformed, >>digest algorithm agility will *BE* disabled? > > Fixed in Postfix 3.2 and

Re: Minor grammar mistake in man 5 postconf

2018-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
J Doe: > This should be changed to: > > ?When this constraint is violated, or any of the digest records are > malformed, > digest algorithm agility will *BE* disabled? Fixed in Postfix 3.2 and later... Wietse

Minor grammar mistake in man 5 postconf

2018-01-08 Thread J Doe
Hi, I noticed a very small grammatical error under: man 5 postconf Under the configuration parameter: tls_dane_digest_agility under the “maybe” option, the second last sentence states: “When this constraint is violated, or any of the digest records are malformed, digest algorithm

Re: I have no idea what these config lines does in master.cf, can you explain?

2018-01-08 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/8/2018 6:36 AM, K F wrote: > I've inherited a lot of postfix servers, and they contain some lines > that I'm not really sure what does, maybe you can explain them to me? > > an example from master.cf > > yahoo unix  -   -   n   -   3   smtp > -o

Re: Postfix Relay per host ACLs

2018-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Stuart Archer: > Morning All, > > Apologies if this is trivial but I can't see it documented anywhere > (although a few possible hints). I don't think this should be an odd > requirement but who knows. Simplest is to eliminate some hosts or network ranges from mynetworks, so they won't be

Re: Microsoft silently discarding emails after recepit

2018-01-08 Thread Kris Deugau
Dominic Raferd wrote: Otherwise, the formatting of your DKIM record in DNS seems weird (try: dig +short 201605sfinacom._domainkey.sfina.com TXT); even if technically valid the intermediate quotes may be influencing 'SmartScreen'. Strictly speaking that result does not in fact contain quotes

Re: Microsoft silently discarding emails after recepit

2018-01-08 Thread D'Arcy Cain
On 01/07/2018 05:25 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Jan 7, 2018, at 6:09 PM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: >> >> Absolutely. There are only two things that an MTA should do with email, >> deliver it or bounce it. Silently dropping is plain wrong. > > There's a reasonable exception for

I have no idea what these config lines does in master.cf, can you explain?

2018-01-08 Thread K F
I've inherited a lot of postfix servers, and they contain some lines that I'm not really sure what does, maybe you can explain them to me? an example from master.cf yahoo unix  -   -   n   -   3   smtp -o syslog_name=postfix-yahoo So this tells postfix something

Re: cleanup Adds From: Using Comment Syntax for GECOS Name.

2018-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Emmanuel Fust?: > Hello, > > As I've been hit by "local_header_rewrite_client" a lots of time because > of local content filter, could you consider to change the default of > "local_header_rewrite_client" from "permit_inet_interface" to "" for the > next compatibility_level bump too ?

Re: cleanup Adds From: Using Comment Syntax for GECOS Name.

2018-01-08 Thread Emmanuel Fusté
Le 07/01/2018 à 02:49, Wietse Venema a écrit : Quick update: I've done a brain-dead simple, but correct, implementation that always quotes the name (just like qmail, BTW). If needed, it can be made smarter later. There 's some draft documentation below. Wietse header_from_format

Postfix Relay per host ACLs

2018-01-08 Thread Stuart Archer
Morning All, Apologies if this is trivial but I can't see it documented anywhere (although a few possible hints). I don't think this should be an odd requirement but who knows. so: group of cloud machines all running various parts of an application for us. lets call them server0 -

Re: Microsoft silently discarding emails after recepit

2018-01-08 Thread Peter
On 08/01/18 19:56, Yuval Levy wrote: > On 2018-01-07 04:32 AM, Peter wrote: >> So to put it simply, they're basically saying that their black box >> thinks that your IP(s) are sending SPAM. > > That's not how I read my conversation with them. My understanding based > on their explanations and