Jos Chrispijn:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
> On 3-6-19 13:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > postmap hash:/postfix/tables/spamtrap what is this?
>
> # spamtrap 180711
> partmaps@?? DISCARD
>
> in main.cf
> check_recipient_access? hash:/postfix/tables/spamtrap,
>
> I
On 3-6-19 13:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
postmap hash:/postfix/tables/spamtrap what is this?
# spamtrap 180711
partmaps@ DISCARD
in main.cf
check_recipient_access hash:/postfix/tables/spamtrap,
I added this some time ago referring to
Hajo Locke:
> Hello List,
>
> i have a question to processing of catch-all adresses between different
> versions.? I see a difference between postfix 3.1 and 3.3 which i cant
> explain.
> I have this scenario:
>
> Using virtual table i have a catch-all forward from a subdomain to a domain
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2019, at 9:02 AM, De Petter Mattheas
> wrote:
>
> For the moment we have a rule that only allow mail from exchange server
> address to postfix (relay server), but when somebody spoofs this address mail
> gets accept and you can send your mail to anybody as anybody.
>
> When I
On 6/3/19 10:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>> For the moment we have a rule that only allow mail from exchange server
>>> adres to postfix (relay server),
>>
>> show us.
>>
>> # mynetworks = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/32, 127.0.0.1/32
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>
They are in are in the same network only admin's can access the network, the
users are in another vlan and can's ssh or rdp to the server. But I just wan't
to make sure everything is secure and covered.
That is the reason for the question.
I thought authentication was possible without creating
On 03.06.19 14:19, De Petter Mattheas wrote:
Answers in after the #
indenting the original answer usually giver much more readable result.
outlook does support indenting...
On 03.06.19 13:02, De Petter Mattheas wrote:
How can we secure are postfix smtp relay server?
complicated
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Google and Microsoft deliver outbound mail for hundreds
of thousands of domains from a common pool of outbound
names. Nobody seems to mind.
Some of us do mind, but there's really nothing we can do about it
because any spam-control measures we might try would block far
Hello
Answers in after the #
On 03.06.19 13:02, De Petter Mattheas wrote:
>How can we secure are postfix smtp relay server?
complicated question...
>For the moment we have a rule that only allow mail from exchange server
>adres to postfix (relay server),
show us.
# mynetworks =
On 03.06.19 13:02, De Petter Mattheas wrote:
How can we secure are postfix smtp relay server?
complicated question...
For the moment we have a rule that only allow mail from exchange server
adres to postfix (relay server),
show us.
but when somebody spoofs this address mail gets accept
Hello
How can we secure are postfix smtp relay server?
For the moment we have a rule that only allow mail from exchange server adres
to postfix (relay server), but when somebody spoofs this address mail gets
accept and you can send your mail to anybody as anybody.
When I check:
Jos Chrispijn:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 30-5-19 14:47, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> > Jos, what I think everybody is trying to tell you is that your cron job
> > has swept the problem under the rug, for now, but that it is still there.
>
> Yes, I noted, thanks for that.
>
> What I have done is running this
Hi Jan,
On 30-5-19 14:47, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
Jos, what I think everybody is trying to tell you is that your cron job
has swept the problem under the rug, for now, but that it is still there.
Yes, I noted, thanks for that.
What I have done is running this batch after a Postfix or Dovecot
Hello List,
i have a question to processing of catch-all adresses between different
versions. I see a difference between postfix 3.1 and 3.3 which i cant
explain.
I have this scenario:
Using virtual table i have a catch-all forward from a subdomain to a domain
@sub.example.com @example.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
