On 06 Jan 2020, at 13:18, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> As my mail provider has told me they updated it to 2030,
This is ridiculous.
It is trivial to automate this by generating a header check dynamically based
on the current UTC date, so doing this “by hand” and setting something up that
allows an
Hallo,
I tried to add SPF on 1and1 domain, got the help page:
https://www.ionos.com/help/domains/configuring-mail-servers-and-other-related-records/using-an-spf-record-to-prevent-spam/
It doesn't state clearly what are their official SPF records, but give
an example:
v=spf1 include:_spf.perf
On 1/6/2020 3:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Regexps that accept exactly one the year in the Date: field will
bounce some email around the end of the year, because year changes
don't happen globally at the same time, and email may be in transit
for up to a few days.
By the end of 2019 the patterns
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 2:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Larry Stone:
>> Yep. Sadly, the mail provider I use for personal email had a spam
>> check to consider dates 2020 and later to be ?from the future? and
>> rejected mail. It took a few hours for them to fix it on 1/1,
>> meanwhile, considera
Regexps that accept exactly one the year in the Date: field will
bounce some email around the end of the year, because year changes
don't happen globally at the same time, and email may be in transit
for up to a few days.
By the end of 2019 the patterns should be:
/^Date: .* 2019/
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:47:24PM +0100, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> Best check your header_checks configuration. It should look like this:
>
> /^Date: .* [0-1][0-9][0-9][0-9]/ REJECT Your email has a date from the
> past. Fix your system clock and try again.
> /^Date: .* 200[0-9]/
Best check your header_checks configuration. It should look like this:
/^Date: .* [0-1][0-9][0-9][0-9]/ REJECT Your email has a date
from the past. Fix your system clock and try again.
/^Date: .* 200[0-9]/ REJECT Your email has a date
from the past. Fix your system clo
Larry Stone:
> Yep. Sadly, the mail provider I use for personal email had a spam
> check to consider dates 2020 and later to be ?from the future? and
> rejected mail. It took a few hours for them to fix it on 1/1,
> meanwhile, considerable mail was lost. Check your various spam
> checking processes
On Jan 6, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Noel Jones mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org>> wrote:
>
> On 1/6/2020 11:31 AM, Roel Wagenaar wrote:
>> L.S.
>> Lately I find rejections in my mail log, my mailers all have ntp running,
>> yet the reject reason is: 5.7.1 HDR9020 Date header is in the distant
>> future.
>>
Roel Wagenaar:
> L.S.
>
> Lately I find rejections in my mail log, my mailers all have ntp running,
> yet the reject reason is: 5.7.1 HDR9020 Date header is in the distant
> future.
> Jan 6 18:18:25 mail1 postfix-in/cleanup[19907]: E59C49805: reject: header
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 17:16:46 +
On 1/6/2020 11:31 AM, Roel Wagenaar wrote:
L.S.
Lately I find rejections in my mail log, my mailers all have ntp running,
yet the reject reason is: 5.7.1 HDR9020 Date header is in the distant
future.
Jan 6 18:18:24 mail1 postfix-in/smtpd[19887]: connect from
english-breakfast.cloud9.net[168.1
L.S.
Lately I find rejections in my mail log, my mailers all have ntp running,
yet the reject reason is: 5.7.1 HDR9020 Date header is in the distant
future.
Jan 6 18:18:24 mail1 postfix-in/smtpd[19887]: connect from
english-breakfast.cloud9.net[168.100.1.7]
Jan 6 18:18:24 mail1 postfix-in/smtp
I don’t know. I haven’t gotten that far…
...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: 307357
From: Roberto Carna
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 4:47 AM
To: Kev
Hello,
I'm also using Splunk, but I'm not really sure parsedmarc worth the effort. The
only dashboard screenshot available for parsedmarc is rather unimpressive…
pat
January 6, 2020 3:35 PM, "Julian Kippels" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using parsedmarc (https://domainaware.github.io/parsedmarc) fo
Hi,
I am using parsedmarc (https://domainaware.github.io/parsedmarc/) for
both aggregate and forensic reports, including sending the results to
our Splunk server with Dashboard.
Julian
Am Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:46:57 -0300
schrieb Roberto Carna :
> Dear Kevin, I've implemented dmarcts-report-viewe
Dear Kevin, I've implemented dmarcts-report-viewer and now it runs OK,..It
gives me veri relevant information.
My new question is this:
dmarcts-report-viewer is only for DMARC aggregation reports ? What can I do
to get and ser DMARC forensic reports ?
Thanks a lot again !!!
El jue., 26 dic. 201
16 matches
Mail list logo
