Re: reject mail to all local system accounts

2020-10-15 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Oct 10, 2020, at 10:06 AM, cody wrote: > > How do i reject incoming e-mail's from remote servers to all local system > accounts? > I can list them in a map via smtpd_recipient_restriction but wonder if there > is an easier way to do that. As mentioned in another response, the essential

Re: reject mail to all local system accounts

2020-10-15 Thread Bob Proulx
cody wrote: > How do i reject incoming e-mail's from remote servers to all local system > accounts? > I can list them in a map via smtpd_recipient_restriction but wonder if there > is an easier way to do that. One of the standard configurations is as a "null client".

Re: Recommended milters for small setup

2020-10-15 Thread curtis
October 15 2020 3:33 PM, "Patrick Ben Koetter" wrote: > * Ian Evans : > >> The long story short is that due to dealing with family medical issues over >> the past few years, my Combo web/postfix server is still on Ubuntu 14.04. >> >> In a couple of months I will have some time to upgrade.

Re: Mail server without MX record.

2020-10-15 Thread Richard
> Date: Thursday, October 15, 2020 18:57:29 + > From: Jason Long > > If the DNS administrator give me an A record then can I sending and > receiving emails from the Internet by the current configuration? > Assuming no MX, if an A-record is set up to point to a machine (properly

Re: Sub-addressing ("plus-addressing") questions...

2020-10-15 Thread Bill Cole
On 15 Oct 2020, at 16:59, Nick wrote: Looks like the relevant RFCs (apart from RFC822, RFC2822 and the ones that followed) seem to be RFC3598 which was later obsoleted by RFC5233 and none of them seem to say what should happen if the delimiter is there multiple times... Neither 3598 nor

Re: Recommended milters for small setup

2020-10-15 Thread lists
I run a personal mail server. Back when I used freeBSD, everyone once in a while amavisd would cause the mail queue to stall. I can't be bothered playing sysadmin to keep things running. My advice is to employ whatever Google wants, namely spf and DKIM. Look as legit as possible. Even then you

Re: Sub-addressing ("plus-addressing") questions...

2020-10-15 Thread Nick
Hi! On 2020-10-14 3:33 p.m., Phil Stracchino wrote: On 10/14/20 3:20 PM, Nick wrote: I also have to tell the developers of our applications what should be allowed... Good luck with that one. I have encountered INNUMERABLE werb sites which fervently insist that '+' is not a legal character

Re: Sub-addressing ("plus-addressing") questions...

2020-10-15 Thread Nick
Hi! On 2020-10-14 9:29 p.m., Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 01:09:33PM +1300, Peter wrote: On 15/10/20 8:20 am, Nick wrote: Is it possible to have more than one "+" sign in the email address, what does Postfix do when it sees that, does it stop at the first one and considers

Re: Recommended milters for small setup

2020-10-15 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Ian Evans : > The long story short is that due to dealing with family medical issues over > the past few years, my Combo web/postfix server is still on Ubuntu 14.04. > > In a couple of months I will have some time to upgrade. Instead of risking > an in place upgrade, I am going to fire up a new

Re: Mail server without MX record.

2020-10-15 Thread Jason Long
Thank you. If the DNS administrator give me an A record then can I sending and receiving emails from the Internet by the current configuration? On Thursday, October 15, 2020, 08:49:36 PM GMT+3:30, Wietse Venema wrote: Jason Long: > Thank you, but I never got my answer.1- Postfix or

Trualias: tcp_virtual_server doesn't require patching local(8)

2020-10-15 Thread Fred Morris
Hello, I've implemented tcp_virtual_server.py which can be utilized with virtual_alias_maps in main.cf, eliminating the need for patching local(8) which is required with tcp_table_server.py/alias_maps. * No need to patch local(8) * No need to specify virtual_alias_domains (mixes and matches

Re: Mail server without MX record.

2020-10-15 Thread Wietse Venema
Jason Long: > Thank you, but I never got my answer.1- Postfix or Dovecot has any > option about changing default record that a mail server using?2- > Could A record offer MX record in my goal? An SMTP server cannnot tell remote systems what TCP port they should connect to, or what DNS record they

Re: Recommended milters for small setup

2020-10-15 Thread PGNet Dev
On 10/15/20 8:19 AM, Ian Evans wrote: > Is there a more efficient, memory stingy, faster milter way to run > spamassassin, clamav, etc, or would you recommend sticking with amavis? very much personal choice. each comes with it's challenges. for any set of choices, you'll get the usual

Re: Mail server without MX record.

2020-10-15 Thread Jason Long
Thank you, but I never got my answer.1- Postfix or Dovecot has any option about changing default record that a mail server using?2- Could A record offer MX record in my goal? On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:09 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Jaroslaw Rafa: > Dnia 14.10.2020 o godz. 13:38:12 Wietse

Re: Recommended milters for small setup

2020-10-15 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 15-10-2020 17:19, Ian Evans wrote: The long story short is that due to dealing with family medical issues over the past few years, my Combo web/postfix server is still on Ubuntu 14.04. In a couple of months I will have some time to upgrade. Instead of risking an in place upgrade, I am

Recommended milters for small setup

2020-10-15 Thread Ian Evans
The long story short is that due to dealing with family medical issues over the past few years, my Combo web/postfix server is still on Ubuntu 14.04. In a couple of months I will have some time to upgrade. Instead of risking an in place upgrade, I am going to fire up a new droplet on

Re: Occasional transient "Insufficient system storage" errors

2020-10-15 Thread Demi M. Obenour
On 10/15/20 3:44 AM, Dara Poon wrote: > (Well, that was embarrassing! I had a Spamassassin milter on outbound mail > that tagged my own message as a false positive. Sending it again for > readability. Sorry!) FYI, GMail considered both the original message and the resend to be spam as well.

Re: Occasional transient "Insufficient system storage" errors

2020-10-15 Thread Wietse Venema
Dara Poon: > Oct 14 13:03:00 smtp2 postfix/smtpd[433514]: fsspace: .: block size 4096, > blocks free 0 > Oct 14 13:03:00 smtp2 postfix/smtpd[433514]: smtpd_check_queue: blocks 4096 > avail 0 min_free 0 msg_size_limit 52428800 > Oct 14 13:03:00 smtp2 postfix/smtpd[433514]: NOQUEUE: reject: MAIL

Re: Occasional transient "Insufficient system storage" errors

2020-10-15 Thread John Fawcett
On 15/10/2020 09:44, Dara Poon wrote: > (Well, that was embarrassing! I had a Spamassassin milter on outbound mail > that tagged my own message as a false positive. Sending it again for > readability. Sorry!) > > > > I'm seeing very occasional "Insufficient system storage" errors in my >

Occasional transient "Insufficient system storage" errors

2020-10-15 Thread Dara Poon
(Well, that was embarrassing! I had a Spamassassin milter on outbound mail that tagged my own message as a false positive. Sending it again for readability. Sorry!) I'm seeing very occasional "Insufficient system storage" errors in my /var/log/mail.log, but it's not the usual lack of disk