W dniu 16.05.2022 o 15:51, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
W dniu 16.05.2022 o 15:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
Any idea to whitlist ?
On 16 May 2022, at 9:35 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
perhaps the null address at outgoing server, so you don't reject
your own bounces
W dniu
W dniu 16.05.2022 o 15:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
Any idea to whitlist ?
On 16 May 2022, at 9:35 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
perhaps the null address at outgoing server, so you don't
reject your own bounces
W dniu 16.05.2022 o 14:46, Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
No. Better to
W dniu 16.05.2022 o 15:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
Any idea to whitlist ?
On 16 May 2022, at 9:35 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
perhaps the null address at outgoing server, so you don't reject
your own bounces
W dniu 16.05.2022 o 14:46, Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
No. Better to
Any idea to whitlist ?
On 16 May 2022, at 9:35 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
perhaps the null address at outgoing server, so you don't reject your own
bounces
W dniu 16.05.2022 o 14:46, Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
No. Better to apply the reject rule only on the inbound side, where
it
Any idea to whitlist ?
On 16 May 2022, at 9:35 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
perhaps the null address at outgoing server, so you don't reject your own
bounces
On 16.05.22 22:46, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
No. Better to apply the reject rule only on the inbound side, where
it should only
W dniu 16.05.2022 o 14:46, Viktor Dukhovni pisze:
On 16 May 2022, at 9:35 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Any idea to whitlist ?
perhaps the null address at outgoing server, so you don't reject your own
bounces
No. Better to apply the reject rule only on the inbound side, where
it
> On 16 May 2022, at 9:35 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> Any idea to whitlist ?
>
> perhaps the null address at outgoing server, so you don't reject your own
> bounces
No. Better to apply the reject rule only on the inbound side, where
it should only lead to bounces on remote
On 16.05.22 12:33, natan wrote:
I have probably trivial problem - but I cannot resolv
I have two server
1)for outgoing
2)for incoming (typical mx)
For test i create in (incoming server) body_checks.pcre:
/alakot/ REJECT spam2bok bla bla
If i send e-mail from external (gmail, yahoo) I get info
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org <> On Behalf Of Matus UHLAR - fantomas
perhaps a but I don't see
On 15.05.22 14:21, Dino Edwards wrote:
So you agree, it should be passing but it's not for some reason.
it was supposed to be a "bug I don't see".
can you install with current policyd-spf
W dniu 16.05.2022 o 13:10, Wietse Venema pisze:
natan:
Hi
I have probably trivial problem - but I cannot resolv
I have two server
1)for outgoing
2)for incoming (typical mx)
For test i create in (incoming server) body_checks.pcre:
/alakot/ REJECT spam2bok bla bla
If i send e-mail from
natan:
> Hi
> I have probably trivial problem - but I cannot resolv
>
> I have two server
> 1)for outgoing
> 2)for incoming (typical mx)
>
> For test i create in (incoming server) body_checks.pcre:
> /alakot/ REJECT spam2bok bla bla
>
> If i send e-mail from external (gmail, yahoo) I get info
Hi
I have probably trivial problem - but I cannot resolv
I have two server
1)for outgoing
2)for incoming (typical mx)
For test i create in (incoming server) body_checks.pcre:
/alakot/ REJECT spam2bok bla bla
If i send e-mail from external (gmail, yahoo) I get info from
Mailer-Daemon about
12 matches
Mail list logo
