Re: Preventing .forward backscatter

2022-06-27 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 02:15:18PM -0700, Derek B. Noonburg wrote: > > If you can convince the user to surrender the alias management to you, > > then you instead configure: > > > > > > owner-user: user > > user: some.a...@gmail.com > > > > And presto magic, email to gmail will be

Re: Preventing .forward backscatter

2022-06-27 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 6/27/22 17:15, Derek B. Noonburg wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 20:13:10 -0400 > Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 02:43:02PM -0700, Derek B. Noonburg wrote: >> >>> I'm running postfix to handle email for several users. One of them >>> has a .forward file that points to a

Re: Preventing .forward backscatter

2022-06-27 Thread Derek B. Noonburg
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 20:13:10 -0400 Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 02:43:02PM -0700, Derek B. Noonburg wrote: > > > I'm running postfix to handle email for several users. One of them > > has a .forward file that points to a gmail address. Gmail's servers > > are rejecting

Re: Rejecting mail from localhost.localdomain

2022-06-27 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-06-27 at 09:51:16 UTC-0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2022 08:51:16 -0500) Rob McGee is rumored to have said: On 2022-06-26 21:23, Alex wrote: Hi, I was surprised to see I received an email with localhost.localdomain as the envelope sender. It was a legitimate email, but not from my This would

Re: Rejecting mail from localhost.localdomain

2022-06-27 Thread Rob McGee
On 2022-06-26 21:23, Alex wrote: Hi, I was surprised to see I received an email with localhost.localdomain as the envelope sender. It was a legitimate email, but not from my This would have been stopped by http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unknown_sender_domain (unless you have

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

2022-06-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Maurizio Caloro: > > On 27.06.2022 00:24, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Maurizio Caloro: > > > > setup also opendkim and will appear now the error " > >> *key data is not secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is > >> not the executing uid (115)* *or the superuser*" > >> it's seem that i

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

2022-06-27 Thread raf
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 07:19:59AM +0200, Maurizio Caloro wrote: > On 27.06.2022 00:24, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Maurizio Caloro: > > > > setup also opendkim and will appear now the error " > > > *key data is not secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which > > > is not the executing uid

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

2022-06-27 Thread raf
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 12:00:20AM +0200, Maurizio Caloro wrote: > > setup also opendkim and will appear now the error "key data is not secure: / > is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is not the executing uid (115)" > it's seem that i have permission issue? > > # opendkim -V >    

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

2022-06-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 27.06.22 00:00, Maurizio Caloro wrote: setup also opendkim and will appear now the error "key data is not secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is not the executing uid (115)" this looks like you have set owner of root directory to non-root user it's seem that i have

Re: Catch-all that pipes to script

2022-06-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Jun 25 2022 at 6:05 PM Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: Because with such a complicated thing as configuring a MTA (yes, it *is* complicated) you should never rely on recipes. You should rely on reading thoroughly the MTA documentation I'm not sure what *exactly* do you mean by a "catch-all" and what