On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:37:41AM +, Sean Hennessey wrote:
> I want to thank you a million for this. I finally read up on the docs
> and got this working. I'm still going to do some more in depth
> testing, but my quick little testing seems to be doing exactly what I
> wanted.
Good luck.
Viktor,
I want to thank you a million for this. I finally read up on the docs and got
this working. I'm still going to do some more in depth testing, but my quick
little testing seems to be doing exactly what I wanted.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 03:44:02PM -0500, Jonathan Capra
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2022, raf wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 11:40:01PM -0500, Jonathan Capra
> > wrote:
> >
> > > smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
> >
> > Not relevant, but the
Hello,
We have good delivery capacity to these providers for now,
- Gmail
- Outlook/Hotmail
- Yahoo
- iCloud
- ATT/Currently
- AOL
- GMX/Web.de
- T-Online
- Vodafone
- Mail.de
- Freenet.de
- Free.fr
Thanks for everyone's helps in the past.
If you have found our server has delivery issues to
I was once charter's customer.
But I leave them since charter was bought by Spectrum.
And spectrum blocks all IP from DO and Linode.
Thanks
>
> >
> > "Henry" == Henry R writes:
> >
> > My mailserver once had some issues on sending messages to different
> > providers. I have contacted the
The issue has been resolved by getting reply from t-online:
"We will unblock your IP. Please notice that it may take up to 24 hours
until the change shows acute effect. Please excuse any inconveniences,
but we do not see other possibilities to react to the millions of
junkmails we receive at
> "Henry" == Henry R writes:
> My mailserver once had some issues on sending messages to different
> providers. I have contacted the provders and most of them were kind
> enough to resolve the blocking issue. Thanks for them (ATT, GMX,
> 1and1 etc).
I'm in the same boat with one provider,
Hi,
only commercial websites and those of entities (e.V. etc.) require an
imprint in germany.
The "TOL problem" also occurs for private persons who do nothing wrong
legally.
And it also affects commercial services who do not host a website under the
mail domain.
Greets,
Ludi
-Ursprüngliche
> Those are obligations for web sites. But what about a mail sending domain
> without web site ?
As far as I'm aware there is no obligation (by law) to provide a website with
legal info
for e-mail only domains. Companies in Germany are required to include that
information
inside *every*
On 11/30/2022 12:42 AM, Sean Hennessey wrote:
I'm going to toy w/ that one tomorrow, I don't recall seeing in your
original post though the plumbing to config postfix to use the postgress
db. I was going to send a mail on that tomorrow, but while you are here
As with everything in Postfix,
Dnia 30.11.2022 o godz. 16:45:02 Gerald Galster pisze:
>
> I'm not a lawyer but this should be part of local legislation in every
> country of the European Union (e-commerce directive):
>
> https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32000L0031=EN
>
> Article 5
>
> 1. In
Those are obligations for web sites. But what about a mail sending
domain without web site ?
> Dnia 30.11.2022 o godz. 23:41:53 Nikolai Lusan pisze:
>>
>> My question is: How do they deal with non-european entities who do not
>> have such legal impediments in their jurisdiction?
>
> While it is actually a legal requirement *in Germany* (not in whole Europe!)
> and for *German*
Dnia 30.11.2022 o godz. 23:41:53 Nikolai Lusan pisze:
>
> My question is: How do they deal with non-european entities who do not
> have such legal impediments in their jurisdiction?
While it is actually a legal requirement *in Germany* (not in whole Europe!)
and for *German* websites to have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 13:15 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> From the discussion on that list it turns out, that the condition
> under
> which they consider a server to be "commercial" is to provide so
> called
> "imprint" on the website associated
Thank you Jaroslaw. following your suggestion i am giving another try.
>
> Dnia 30.11.2022 o godz. 02:08:57 Henry R pisze:
>
> >
> > That's so strange policy to permit only commercial company to send messages
> > to them.
> > But there are many small companies/org who have their own
Sean Hennessey:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
> I've been poking at this a bit tonight. I am by no means a postfix expert. In
> the hopes that someone can see an obvious configuration issue, I'm going to
> post what I'm seeing:
>
> In my main.cf;
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
Dnia 30.11.2022 o godz. 02:08:57 Henry R pisze:
> That's so strange policy to permit only commercial company to send messages
> to them.
> But there are many small companies/org who have their own mailservers, which
> can't send messages to t-online directly.
>
> How do you think of this
The mail log did say:
Nov 30 12:17:08 mx3 postfix/smtp[220173]: EEF9C9F07F: host
mx01.t-online.de[194.25.134.72] refused to talk to me: 554 IP=xx.xx.xx.xx -
None/bad reputation. Ask your postmaster for help or to contact
t...@rx.t-online.de for reset. (NOWL)
I use the contact from the
Thank you very much. i will improve my site to fill their requirement.
>
> >
> > But t-online.de keep blocking me. I have contacted them twice and got the
> > same answer:
> >
> > We only allow evidently commercial or similar operators to connect to
> > our mailservers. So, as a private
I am trying to ecnrypt email storage at rest, such as Two-way encryption and
decryption.
Thanks :)
>
> Hello Henry,
> I am running my own email-server as well and can connect to t-online. I
> assume Viktor is right that they somehow check the imprint of a parallel web
> site. My website
Hi,
I remember writing to TOL on behalf of a .net organisation. And request they
whitelist the new IP of their server. That worked.
The address should be in your logfile with the reject.
Did you use that or some other channel to talk to them?
So many companies ignore basic things like abuses.
22 matches
Mail list logo
