On 5/6/2011 1:53 PM, Jack wrote:
Is there anything I can do to process that a little quicker and not choke
the box to death?
In lie of seeing the information requested in the debug readme, I'll
make an educated guess that the server in question is receiving mail
from internet hosts, your
On 5/7/2011 12:52 PM, Dennis Carr wrote:
Being that the issue seems to be stemming from an issue in HELO,
wouldn't it be more logical to work with smtpd_helo_restrictions?
What would be logical is for you to provide us with relevant log
entries, per the welcome message you received when
On 5/7/2011 1:01 PM, Dennis Carr wrote:
I'm ultimately trying to
reject any mail from servers that say they are me and are distinctively
NOT.
Ultimately, the proper way to separate public connections from private
connections is to create separate smtpd listeners (or use a separate
server
On 5/10/2011 8:39 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 10:56 pm, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Voytek Eymontli...@sbt.net.au:
Unfortunately you excluded the only recommended solution. Either use
Postfix client side authentication if you like it more complex use
certificate
On 5/12/2011 6:59 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jan-Frode Myklebust:
We just got bitten by a strange problem with our mynetworks-file. In
main.cf we have mynetworks = /etc/postfix/mynetworks, and the
/etc/postfix/mynetworks has been used to both include and exclude
networks for ages... using the
On 5/12/2011 8:11 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
can in include an if $user=fred dev/null else /^..
http://linux.die.net/man/5/pcre_table
or simply execute
/$ man 5 pcre_table
--
Stan
On 5/14/2011 4:01 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I can connect to you mailserver:
# telnet mail.kasdivi.com 25
Trying 209.160.65.133...
Connected to mail.kasdivi.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 tuna.theoceanwindow-bv.com
Same here, from my Postfix host at 65.41.216.221:
~$ telnet
Please keep replies on list Jason. Forwarding...
On 5/14/2011 11:38 AM, jason hirsh wrote:
On May 14, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/14/2011 4:01 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I can connect to you mailserver:
# telnet mail.kasdivi.com 25
Trying 209.160.65.133...
Connected
On 5/16/2011 9:47 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
If the netmask is mis-configured (say, 0xff00) then that explains
why we see no responses to connection attempts from 209.85.210.182
(and other 209.* IP addresses).
Wietse's amazing crystal ball strikes again! :)
Well, ya know, one just might
On 5/16/2011 10:38 AM, jason hirsh wrote:
I have a lot more to learn
Nah, you've just spent too much time under water breathing through a
tube. Eats away at the brain ya know. You demonstrated this when you
contemplated switching to Sendmail to solve this problem.
;)
--
Stan
On 5/16/2011 7:10 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Jason,
I am glad your problem was solved. Also, I hope this thread taught you
a valuable lesson: instead of spreading misinformation and questioning
the 'quality' of free advice, you could focus your efforts on the very
basics of system
On 5/23/2011 2:10 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
OK OK I am not a Linux specialist most of my servers
are running FreeBSD , but I have to build a Linux server
for a friend ( who is not a UNIX specialist ).
So I posted in that list which count many Linux specialists ;-)
Selecting an operating system
On 5/27/2011 2:26 AM, Finzel, Heiko wrote:
Yes , it does.
Sorry I forgot to mention that or to post parts of my main.fc
Do not post main.cf snippets. Post your un-obfuscated 'postconf -n'
output, and un-obfuscated log entries, as you were instructed by the
list welcome message.
[snip]
--
On 5/27/2011 6:49 AM, Thijssen wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 00:08, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 00:03:26 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/26/2011 11:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
can somebody please remove the idiots from LinkedIn from
mailing-lists?
s/from
On 5/28/2011 5:22 AM, Wojciech Giel wrote:
when I'm sending mail from my domain, localhost, to external recipients
it works fine but when I'm trying to send from home (my isp domain) I get
I'm guessing you didn't enable the 587 listener in master.cf, which is
what enables authenticated
On 5/31/2011 5:18 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
sorry if this mail does not belong here, but maybe some other admins
share the same burden. :-)
Correct. This subject is totally off topic here. Asking for help
configuring Postfix to use a DNSBL is on topic. Discussion WRT being
On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
well worth what they charge.
Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing it all down and
starting over
On 6/5/2011 8:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
well worth what they charge.
Conversely to do it inhouse I
On 6/8/2011 7:35 AM, Бак Микаел wrote:
Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Бак Микаел mikael@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi list,
Reading the archives I saw that there is a nice regexp with dynamic
hostnames available here: www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
Unfortunately this
On 6/8/2011 3:06 PM, mouss wrote:
I am not sure Stan made it public. he provided it to a limited
audience. if the whome internet starts downloading it every second,
he'll get angry...
It's intended to be public, free for anyone to use. Mouss, if what you
described were to occur, you wouldn't
On 6/15/2011 7:21 AM, Dyonisius Visser wrote:
Hi guys
At the moment we use local spamfiltering on our MX smtp.terena.org.
I would like to test out a new mail filtering product, which is a hosted
solution. This system is configured to accept mail for our domains, and
deliver it to
On 6/16/2011 2:39 AM, J4K wrote:
On 06/15/2011 09:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
When something stops working, then something has changed. You need
to find out what has changed. Postfix does not change spontaneously.
Wietse
You are quite correct. Something did change, but I don't recall
On 7/3/2011 3:14 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I would like to force all my real users to use SMTP AUTH
( SASL + LDAP ) but we have many internal mailing lists
running and I wonder if it is possible to add an exception
for that purpose , I think it would be possible with mynetwork
On 7/6/2011 12:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Some table types such as CIDR ignore the domain name. With table
types such as CIDR, regexp and pcre, check_client_access does no
prefix/suffix lookups.
Given this, a pcre rule with ``/:/ DUNNO'' is sufficient to skip
IPv6 addresses.
Thanks for
On 7/7/2011 5:58 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:36:02AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I received a request to ignore IPv4 addresses as well in order to
improve performance. But given the extensive IF loops it seems
we'd only save something like a few picoseconds of CPU time
On 7/7/2011 10:14 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 08:24:42AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 7/7/2011 7:48 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:44:49AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/7/2011 5:58 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
The anchors at both ends mean you are safe. You start
On 7/11/2011 4:17 AM, Rytec wrote:
So I'm afraid pcre is not available
Strange that Debian installs postfix-pcre by default but Ubuntu doesn't.
They both seem to include all the others.
Or I can install the postfix-pcre module in Ubuntu but Would it do harm or
willI
have to reconfigure
On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
instructions:
http://anothersysadmin.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/postfix-as-relay-to-a-smtp-requiring-authentication/
but it's not working. I know my SMTP server is set up
On 7/11/2011 11:16 PM, jeffrey starin wrote:
I am trying to use the smtp_bind_address command so that three seperate ips
can be used for 3 separate clients who are using email campaign software as
explained in this howto:
On 7/12/2011 12:12 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according to these
instructions:
http://anothersysadmin.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/postfix-as-relay
On 7/12/2011 1:09 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-07-12 07:12, Ron Garret wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/11/2011 8:12 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
I'm trying to set up a relay host with authentication according
On 7/12/2011 1:37 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
Configure smtp_tls_security_level and/or smtp_tls_policy_maps, using at
least a setting of 'may'. This will allow the SMTP client to attempt
STARTTLS connections with remote hosts.
Ah. I thought
On 7/12/2011 10:59 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
Since this is a server to server relay of known/trusted systems, and
assuming that 184.73.65.10 is static and won't change any time soon, why
not simply add 184.73.65.10 to $mynetworks on secure.genesisgroup.info
and forget the sasl auth junk? This
On 7/12/2011 4:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
smtp_bind_address is a new feature as of 2.7, clearly stated at the top
No, smtp_bind_address is available in all Postfix versions since 2001.
Correct. I got in hurry. Apologies. The 2.7 feature in the 'how-to'
article he linked was:
On 7/13/2011 10:51 AM, Geert Mak wrote:
On 13.07.2011, at 17:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher
account we monitor) -
- all mail sent to undisclosed recipients
You
On 7/13/2011 3:08 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 13/07/2011 19:04, motty.cruz a écrit :
Received: from ucmx01.uzuncase.com (66-193-162-90.static.twtelecom.net
[66.193.162.90])
you might start with
/^(\d+\W){4}.*\.twtelecom\.net$/
REJECT generic hostname. please use your ISP or fix your
On 7/13/2011 6:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
SOHO or not: ip-addresses in PTR are mostly not real mailservers
The operative word here is mostly. For instance, my outbound:
$ dig mx hardwarefreak.com
hardwarefreak.com. IN MX 10 greer.hardwarefreak.com.
greer.hardwarefreak.com.
On 7/14/2011 6:58 AM, Peter Tselios wrote:
Hallo,
I need to prepare a presentation for my company because we plan to deploy
a new mail system. I need to know the names of some medium to large ISPs that
uses Postfix as their SMTP server. Do you know where I can find that
information?
On 7/14/2011 7:59 AM, Rytec wrote:
Dear members,
Which restriction should I need to use to prevent HELO/EHLO connections with
IP
numbers ?
This person is spoofing me.
See example below.
118-167-100-152.dynamic.hinet.net[118.167.100.152]
The following PCRE table is designed to block
On 7/14/2011 5:55 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/14/2011 6:58 AM, Peter Tselios wrote:
Hallo,
I need to prepare a presentation for my company because we plan to
deploy a new mail system. I need to know the names of some medium to large
ISPs that uses Postfix as their SMTP server. Do you
On 7/15/2011 8:46 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
In this case it appears they've replaced the 500 5.5.2 unrecognized
command error with with a custom message:
214 See http://www.messagelabs.com/support
Some of the Synacor systems do this as well, while others have
On 7/15/2011 3:15 PM, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
To summarize, we think SMTP Auth is the simplest and most useful way to
allow people to send mail through our outbound mail system, and we are
hoping to get some feedback from the community regarding this perspective.
If I understand your
On 7/15/2011 5:55 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bonnet
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:08 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Large ISP which use Postfix
On 7/15/2011 6:01 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
A. Newer versions of eCelerity use a different MTA
B. They changed the code to make the help message user configurable
C. Stan didn't read the return codes thoroughly enough.
I believe the correct answer is C. :(
--
Stan
On 7/18/2011 1:29 AM, Marky Yehezkiel[SNC] wrote:
I am using postfix and want to certain recipient only receive email from
outside with certain subject. such as t...@mydomain.com only receive email
with subject test 1 and test 2
Is it possible? If yes does anyone has done it ? and how to
Hi Steve,
Unfortunately fqrdns.pcre doesn't help with deliveries. ;)
On 7/26/2011 5:32 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
We send a moderately decent amount of legitimate mail to our
subscribers (about 400K opt-in newsletter members) using Postfix.
...
But it still takes the better part of a day to
On 7/29/2011 4:40 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default
behaviour with silly transport_maps that don't work.
Without transport_maps it doesn't works. If I set
On 7/30/2011 2:27 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
587 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=
-o smtpd_helo_restrictions=
-o smtpd_sender_restrictions=
-o
On 7/30/2011 3:23 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default
behaviour with
On 7/30/2011 5:29 AM, Miguel Guedes wrote:
Hi,
I've recently followed a guide I found online [1] and installed Postfix and
Courier on my server machine. I can send emails from the server to any email
address but unfortunately I can only receive emails sent from the server -
it's only
On 8/2/2011 9:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeetu:
i get this in log
Aug 2 17:27:52 inbound-in-1 postfix/postscreen[24480]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from [x.x.x.x]:17847: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; client
[x.x.x.x] blocked using zen.spamhaus.org; from=s...@xxx.com,
to=ka...@yyy.net,
On 8/3/2011 2:56 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
If I set
virtual_transport = dovecot
outbound emails are always deferred.
I gave you the correct fix for this a few days ago: 587 submission.
--
Stan
On 8/3/2011 9:04 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:19:10 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/3/2011 2:56 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
If I set
virtual_transport = dovecot
outbound emails are always deferred.
I gave you the correct fix for this a few days ago: 587 submission
On 7/8/2012 3:20 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
Jul 8 22:09:28 mail postfix/local[1999]: 144761410:
to=test@muellerbackwaren.local, relay=local, delay=0.97,
delays=0.54/0.03/0/0.4, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (unknown user: test)
By default, for local delivery, Postfix looks up user names in
On 7/13/2012 3:04 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good morning List.
Hay Tom,
I have a question regarding rate-limiting.
I know how to rate limit outbound mail by destination domain BUT am unable
to find any information or example on how to do the same incoming??
at certain times of the month,
On 7/14/2012 11:40 PM, Ryan Pugatch wrote:
I am running Zimbra which means my MTAs are running Postfix 2.6.7.
At work, our mail systems were hosted within our office but as of
yesterday they are hosted externally at a data center.
When everyone would get to the MTA while the system was in
On 7/15/2012 9:53 AM, Ryan Pugatch wrote:
There is an ASA firewall in the office
and an ASA firewall in the new datacenter.
Upon seeing this I thought Aha! Then I read:
No esmtp fixup though.
That fixup is often the cause of such goofy problems. Nonetheless, it
is a good idea to eliminate
On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can do
but not limit legitimate use.
See:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
You would apply this to your submission service, eg:
587 inet n
On 7/24/2012 12:44 AM, CSS wrote:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can do
but not limit legitimate use.
See:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
On 7/24/2012 2:08 AM, CSS wrote:
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but I was under the impression that the
anvil limits were all enforced on a per-connection or per-IP limit. I'm
really after something that can track a particular sasl-authenticated user
and punish them (and not other
On 7/24/2012 6:24 PM, mouss wrote:
anvil is not an anti-spam solution. it's measure against clients gone
crazy.
Precisely. And that's how I advised the OP to us it: Plug the artery
until surgery can be performed. Surgery in this case being disabling
the account and setting a strong
On 7/25/2012 4:09 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
Indeed there isn't much disagreement on what forms a strong password (in
principle). I do fail to see how this could be enforced on a technical
level, though.
Use a plugin such as:
On 7/25/2012 8:02 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
I am receiving massive amounts of incoming mail (freakin status updates)
from facebookmail.com and was hoping to check the connection rate via
anvil in the logs.
However, there are no suck entries in the log.
I am trying to gets stats so that I can
On 7/27/2012 10:18 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dennis Clarke:
Do you think I can figure that one out ? No way. What I do find is
vast amounts of info about how to put in ClamAV and SSL bits and auth
bits and endless web pages that point to apt-get and RHEL yum this that
and the other
On 7/29/2012 6:57 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
Actually it is not router. It is only BPL modem. After Static IP hiring the
ISP send me an email how to configure the server with this IP addresses
information. The 10.138.9.201 internal IP address selection was not made by
myself.
Engin what
On 7/30/2012 8:19 AM, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
On 07/30/2012 03:34 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
Stan, *whois* your friend:
netname: MTRNT-NET
descr: Metronet Iletisim Teknoloji A.S.
country: TR
TR stands
On 7/31/2012 4:12 AM, Engin qwert wrote:
Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
I am living in Turkey, Istanbul Tuzla. and my ISP is Metronet. (Sorry for
shutting downing the server since last post.)
I also want to re send the IP information that is relevant to situation.
On 8/2/2012 6:26 AM, Chad M Stewart wrote:
On Aug 2, 2012, at 6:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Chad M Stewart:
I am not understanding something correctly. I'm using postscreen
and noticed that a recently connected IP had was not marked as
PASS OLD but rather PASS NEW. See log entires
Would someone kindly point me to the docs that describe the behavior of
smtpd socket open time in relation to clients that do connection caching?
I've been assisting in a troubleshooting effort. A sendmail/mailman
based list server is opening more than 4 concurrent connections to my MX
even when
On 8/4/2012 9:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
Would someone kindly point me to the docs that describe the behavior of
smtpd socket open time in relation to clients that do connection caching?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_timeout
It's stress-dependent.
Thanks
On 8/4/2012 10:08 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
postscreen_client_connection_count_limit = 10
I'm not sure why you did this. Some MTAs, notably qmail, are likely
to assault you with many simultaneous connections. This non-default
setting might cause difficulty at times in receiving legitimate
On 8/5/2012 10:53 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 07:48:56AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/4/2012 10:08 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
postscreen_client_connection_count_limit = 10
I'm not sure why you did this. Some MTAs, notably qmail, are
likely to assault you with many
On 8/7/2012 11:45 AM, tobi wrote:
Hi list,
I'm currently doing some brainstorming on how to protect backup-mx
servers from being directly contacted by clients. I found that
postscreen can do this, but as far as I read only if the backup runs on
the same machine.
Another idea that came in
On 8/7/2012 5:32 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:58:41AM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
...
A second question: Is anyone aware of any (Linux) smart script
automating (at least to some extent) reliably enough detection of a
mail server failure (to avoid re-inventing the
On 8/8/2012 4:24 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 8/8/2012 3:41 πμ, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Yes, this is not a Postfix issue but a mail store issue. Nikolaos, what
mail server are you using? Cyrus, Dovecot, other?
As Viktor points out, building an HA mail server is not trivial. But we
can
On 8/10/2012 7:31 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/10/2012 7:23 AM, Vishal Agarwal wrote:
Hi,
As most of us are using postfix, I feel that I can get help for
MailScanner problem also here.
For mailscanner support, please contact the mailscanner user list.
Also worth noting, from:
On 8/10/2012 8:31 AM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
what are current 'recommended' rbl lists that people use ?
This thread could potentially explode with responses. Probably best to
nip it in the bud now. This subject is decidedly off topic for the
Postfix list. Please discuss this in an
On 8/10/2012 10:53 AM, Pete wrote:
My postfix server is logging status=SOFTBOUNCE after I have set up an
alias and sent mail to said alias. It logs this message every hour, which
is also triggering a script to fire every hour. Is this the correct forum
to ask for some guidance on this issue?
On 8/14/2012 4:06 AM, Naval saini wrote:
I want to relay 100 mails per day from my server for this purpose i want
to use haproxy load balancing can go with this.?
please if any one can suggest me the best way to do this i appreciate the
suggestions.
When someone says relay 1 million
On 8/15/2012 11:44 PM, Rich wrote:
I have wondered why you would want your email in one file. I have always
thought it was better to have a setup like cyrus that uses skiplist or
berkley.db. sounds like that is what you have. You have some sort of
mailstore. check to see if its cyrus MTA.
On 8/17/2012 9:36 PM, අයි. ඩී. චාමින්ද ඉන්ද්රජිත් wrote:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Rq user=nobody null_sender=
argv=/etc/postfix/enkive-socket-filter 192.168.2.66 2527
${sender} ${recipient}
On 8/18/2012 8:51 PM, අයි. ඩී. චාමින්ද ඉන්ද්රජිත් wrote:
Thank you very much for your help...
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dear All,
I have configured Enkive Mail Archive Server and pointed Messages of
my mail server to Enkive as
On 8/23/2012 7:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mike Mitchell:
The first issue I know is being reported is seemingly a throttling
of submissions to the server--we can send about 50, then we're
made to wait almost exactly 6 seconds, then we can send about 50
more.
This is a built-in safety
On 8/24/2012 10:05 AM, Mike Mitchell wrote:
On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:11 AM, francis picabia fpica...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Mike Mitchell m...@mitchellzone.org wrote:
I am attempting to configure a postfix server to handle really high-speed
mail delivery. This means
I'm copying this response back to the list, as this discussion needs to
be in the various list archives for other who may intend to follow in
your footsteps.
On 8/27/2012 8:09 AM, Mike Mitchell wrote:
I do have to say, I was originally hoping that I could optimize things
merely with some
On 8/28/2012 8:16 AM, Mike wrote:
The first thing that comes to mind is using a ramdisk for the queue
directories.
But I'm doubting Postfix will work with queue directories on a
ramdisk. Wietse can answer this.
There's no reason Postfix won't work with /var/spool/postfix mounted
from
On 8/28/2012 1:13 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:48:19AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
So maybe for this particular application a ramdisk isn't a horrible
idea. But he still has the problem of implementing parallel submission
in his java application, otherwise it won't
On 9/2/2012 10:07 PM, Joey Prestia wrote:
Hi all,
I am familiar with yahoo being difficult to send email to
[snip]
Can anyone offer any guidance on what direction I need to go?
Start here:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/bulkv2.html
--
Stan
On 9/3/2012 12:02 AM, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
In other words, if 'we strip this back to hypothetical and assume a
perfect world without any issues', this 'GreenArrow' maxes out at
300,000 messages per hour. Postfix can send 10,8 million messages per
hour, more than 35 times as fast*.
In
On 9/3/2012 5:44 PM, Joey Prestia wrote:
On 9/3/2012 10:43 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Sadly, Yahoo discriminates the Postfix connection cache which limits
connection re-use by time rather than delivery count. Limiting by
delivery count behaves poorly when one or more of the MX hosts for
a
On 9/8/2012 8:43 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:01:13AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
When sending lots of mails (mass mailings) via many machines, one
quickly realizes that the current concept of smtp_fallback_relay is
a bit problematic:
If one thinks harder, one
On 9/13/2012 9:59 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
I'm configuring Postfix with SpamAssassin, using Spampd as a
before-queue filter. I put /^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REJECT Spam detected
in /etc/postfix/header_checks, and that works (spam is rejected during
SMTP as desired).
However, it would be nice to
On 9/24/2012 3:32 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'm running 2.3.3 on CentOS 5 as a mail relay; most of my mail is
delivered to an internal Exchange 2010 environment with two Hub
Transport machines clustered behind Windows NLB under the same
hostname.
We have the same setup, but with a more
On 9/25/2012 8:29 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mikael Bak m...@inbox.lv:
Hi Stan,
On 09/25/2012 08:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Apparently Linux and Windows TCP window scaling doesn't always work
reliably together. Try disabling TCP window scaling on the Linux box(en):
[snip]
Perhaps
On 10/3/2012 4:30 PM, Steffen Schebesta wrote:
Thanks for all the insightful answers.
So, I actually use the long_queue_ids options and I save the queue_ids to a
database to later compare them to the queue_ids found in the mail log to
parse and mark the bounces.
The problem - and thus the
On 10/8/2012 3:25 AM, Steffen Schebesta wrote:
Hello Wietse,
ok, here is my problem in detail:
This isn't the answer to the question Wietse, and myself, asked you.
You've failed to understand the nature of our question 3 times now.
10,000 ft view means you're in an airplane at altitude
On 10/16/2012 9:17 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
I am trying to execute a java program from postfix using
a pipe alias.
When I send an email to the alias, I get this back from postfix:
Command died with status 1:
/root/webapps/cbsweb/WEB-INF/bin/mdcm/mailHandler. Command output:
On 10/17/2012 3:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:33:38PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/16/2012 9:17 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Here is my alias in /etc/aliases:
# Forward mdcm messages to mail handler
mdcm: |/root/webapps/cbsweb/WEB-INF/bin/mdcm/mailHandler
You're
He's made 6 posts since joining less than 24 hours ago. All have
been 100% off topic, argumentative and/or preachy. It is clear he
didn't join this list to receive help with Postfix, or to help
others with Postfix.
He should take the opportunity to remove himself before Wietse
performs this
On 10/23/2012 12:07 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
Can a postscript server
Postscript is a printer language similar to PCL, but much older. You
meant to say Postfix. The former has existed more than a decade longer
than Postfix which is an SMTP mail transfer agent, or MTA.
--
Stan
901 - 1000 of 1223 matches
Mail list logo
