Sam Przyswa:
The problem occur when we send mail to this domain, we had no problems
before we changed our IP mail server and MX record for our domain.
In that case, it is likely that the IP address triggers a reject
by the Trend Micro Email Reputation Service.
For example:
- You are suddenly
Attila Nagy:
So:
- is there any way to let other domains get into the active queue in a
No.
Just like ordinary programs read large files sequentially using a
limited amount of intermediate buffer space, the Postfix queue
manager reads a large queue sequentially using a limited amount
of
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:08:12AM -0600, Glenn English wrote:
It looks to me like the problem has something to do with DNS, not
SMTP, right?
Yes.
And why would Yahoo be doing a CNAME lookup?
Their MTA does that for all destinations, among other lookups.
(I
Attila Nagy:
I've only written this, because I was sure that somebody would miss it.
This destination is not slow because of slow delivery times on the
already open connections, but because of connection timeouts (I can
observe this on other, mostly silent systems, which send only few
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:32:13PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
And why would Yahoo be doing a CNAME lookup?
Their MTA does that for all destinations, among other lookups.
Your DNS server is a bit odd:
$ dig +trace -t any slsware.com
K bharathan:
hi all
is there a way to restrict a sender to send only to a fixed no.of recipients
in one mail! i want this to be kept as a general rule on my smtp out server
Other people have already mentioned the policy plugins. Another
possibility is to use the built-in rate limit.
Stefan Foerster:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
When a message reenters from an instance that uses XFORWARD, for example
amavis, will Postfix count the IP used twice and, for example,
add that to smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit?
Rate limits apply
Kouhei Sutou:
Hi,
Postfix 2.7.0 supports milter protocol 2, 3, 4 and
6. Postfix with milter_protocol=6 accepts a connection from
a milter that uses milter protocol 2. But its milter session
is broken because Postfix sends SMFIC_DATA event to the
milter. In milter protocol 2, SMFIC_DATA
Wietse Venema:
Kouhei Sutou:
Hi,
Postfix 2.7.0 supports milter protocol 2, 3, 4 and
6. Postfix with milter_protocol=6 accepts a connection from
a milter that uses milter protocol 2. But its milter session
is broken because Postfix sends SMFIC_DATA event to the
milter. In milter
Marc Falzon:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Hello all,
I am currently trying to configure Postfix to route incoming emails
based on email address matching to a daemon I wrote.
Here is the context : I am developing a simple mailing list management
daemon to which I
Dave Green:
Thanks kindly for your reply
There is no fundamental reason why pickup-cleanup is slower than
smtpd-cleanup (other than different receive_override_options
settings in master.cf).
However, it is possible that you're sending mail INTO Postfix at
a slower rate than
Dave Green:
Can you do some tests with a recent version of Postfix's own stress
testing tool?
smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk -l 5242880 -m 10 206.125.173.103
0m42.62s real0m0.02s user0m0.31s system
smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk -l 5242880 -m 10
Wietse Venema:
Dave Green:
Can you do some tests with a recent version of Postfix's own stress
testing tool?
smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk -l 5242880 -m 10 206.125.173.103
0m42.62s real0m0.02s user0m0.31s system
smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk
Sean Reifschneider:
On 03/19/2010 04:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
In the mean time, it would help if you could provide verbose (smtpd
AND cleanup) logging for a failed session. Please include information
We're trying to get the logging information. Versions we've seen this on
include
Dick Visser:
Hi guys
At the moment we use SASL authentication to allow our users to
send mail through our mailer (Postfix 2.5). I would like to extend this
to using client certificates for authentication as well.
Our users have personal certificates that are signed by a the TERENA
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.6.6.html]
Postfix legacy releases 2.6.6, 2.5.10 and 2.4.14 contain fixes that
were already included with Postfix 2.7 (stable release) and Postfix
2.8 (experimental release).
NOTE: Postfix
James Lever:
I_ve been banging my head away at this for a while today and all
I have is a headache.
Is there a (preferably generic) way to redirect *all* delivery to
local accounts to $lo...@$mydomain instead of delivering to
/var/mail/ ?
(I_m trying to setup a true NULL CLIENT
Martijn de Munnik:
Hi,
Our smtp server has some issues when talking to some remote mx's. This
results in a timeout and the message not being delivered (this was
discussed on this mailinglist but there doesn't seem to be a real
solution available now). When we relay the message through
Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 04:18:49PM +, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
[ Received: from stytwo.spampig.org.uk (stytwo.spampig.org.uk
[212.69.52.158]) ]
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:05 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Everything you need to know is the RELEASE_NOTES.
Query your mysql tables for the domains that loop:
$ postmap -q 126.com mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-va.cf || echo not found
$ postmap -q 126.com mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-vd.cf || echo not found
In both cases the output should be the text not found.
Wietse
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
Hi all.
I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list.
I'm really hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do
here. I've been looking into things for the last couple days and
have not made any progress.
You forgot to follow the mailing list
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
Hi all.
I posted this the other day but got no replies, on or off list.
I'm really hoping someone might have an idea of what I can do
here. I've been looking into things for the last couple days
Sean Reifschneider:
On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
EX:
r...@theholycat.com: Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
reply to RCPT TO command))
I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that's where
Maybe you should look into spam feedback loops, to get notified when
users at remote ISPs are flagging your mail as SPAM.
http://www.google.com/search?q=spam+feedback+loop
Wietse
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
If all you want is treat anything.example.com as example.com, use:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
mydestination = localhost example.com pcre:/etc/postfix/mydestination.pcre
/etc/postfix/mydestination.pcre:
/\.example\.com$/ whatever
Where whatever may be any
James Lever:
On 25/03/2010, at 3:45 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#myorigin
See the *second* paragraph.
Also: http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick
Unfortunately, the problem with both of these configurations
James Lever:
* all mail to be sent on to a relayhost regardless of whether
the local MTA thinks it should be delivered locally or not.
(this is the specfic issue I currently have)
relayhost = $mydomain
* all mail to be rewritten in the form $lo...@$mydomain (preferrably
in that
Gregory BELLIER:
At this point, you really need to step back, take a deep breath, and
use OpenSSL as-is.
As I said, it's to learn. If I do nothing then it's pointless.
What I ask is not your point on if it's relevant to do it or not because
we all know it's not.
With intense
David Michard:
Hello,
I know this question has been discussed on this list* but no suitable
solution was provided for our SMTP server settings.
A patch** is published but reports on this list say that it does not work.
I am responsible for a medium sized mailing-list, through which one
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
Here's what I did when I had a similar issue with sendmail: I
reconfigured sendmail such that all mailers are considered expensive.
In sendmail, what this does is: new messages are only queued, and
messages are sent only during a queue run.
...
I don't know if postfix
Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago:
I had configured default_destination_recipient_limit to 1500 and I
couldn't send an email destined to 1100 recipients. It was when I
modified this two options when I got it working:
smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit
smtpd_recipient_limit
I rtfm but I just can't
Stephens, Kurt:
I'd like to have all local postfix deliveries to go directly into
a TCP or UDS (named pipe) socket, that will eventually end up raw
in database table for subsequent triage.
It's easy enough to take one of the pipe(8) examples in master.cf,
run a netcat-like command, and set
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:28:50PM +0100, Matias Surdi wrote:
The problem is that I'm receiving mails to non existent accounts, or ,
with an accented (non ascii) character and instead of rejecting the
mail postfix is replying the client with a 451 error, here is the
Da-Huntha:
Oops, I forgot to mention the problem: All mail goes to the catch-all
address, so even mail destined for m...@domain.com.
As documented, virtual alias expansion is recursive.
# /etc/postfix/virtual
m...@domain.com me
@domain.com spam
@domain2.com spam
To stop the recursion,
Rafael Andrade:
Hello Members,
I would like to know if there is a method so I can have the following
configuration on my MTA:
The user foobar can receive attached jpeg files, but cannot send
attached jpegs. I need this because some employees must receive some
files in a specific
Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago:
El vie, 26-03-2010 a las 12:06 +0100, Wietse Venema escribi?:
Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago:
I had configured default_destination_recipient_limit to 1500 and I
couldn't send an email destined to 1100 recipients. It was when I
modified this two options when I
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:54:00PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Don't pass non-ASCII user names to your LDAP table.
Hmm. If the Postfix LDAP driver handles only non-ASCII query keys
then we should have a smarter response from the mail system.
Agreed. By the time I
Stefan Foerster:
As of today, is u...@sch?n.example.com the same user as
u...@xn--schn-7qa.example.com, as far as e.g. access(5) maps are
concerned?
No, they are, and have always been, different.
If xn--schn-7qa.example.com is what Postfix receives, then
xn--schn-7qa.example.com is what
Frank Reid:
Scenario: I would like to deliver all mail for the @example.com domain to a
single mailbox as a single delivery (to preserve header information). I
have set up:
-- main.cf
virtual_alias_domains = example.com
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
-- virtual
Frank Reid:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Yes it is possible. However, I need to warn you first about a
mis-conception.
The To: header is NOT a reliable indicator of the intended recipient.
Understand. I have no intention to sort out or deliver this mail by other
means from
Frank Reid:
Wietse Venema wrote:
To prove that POSTFIX is at fault you need to demonstrate that
ONE message with MULTIPLE recipients results in MULTIPLE deliveries.
I did some tests, and it appears it only happens when addressing the virtual
domain. POSTFIX does only one RCPT
Frank Reid:
Wietse Venema wrote:
To prove that POSTFIX is at fault you need to demonstrate that
ONE message with MULTIPLE recipients results in MULTIPLE deliveries.
I did some tests, and it appears it only happens when addressing the virtual
domain. POSTFIX does only one RCPT
Ralf Hildebrandt:
During my internal performance tests I noticed the fsstone program and
wondered what became of your ide to use append/truncate instead of
generating new queuefiles.
From http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-07/0991.html
Early measurements have shown that
Patric Falinder:
ah, I changed that but now I get this error message:
warning: regexp map /etc/postfix/recipient_bcc, line 1: using empty
replacement string
warning: recipient_bcc_maps lookup of patric.falin...@sub.domain.com
returns an empty string result
warning: recipient_bcc_maps
Patric Falinder:
/etc/postfix/recipient_bcc:
/@sub\.domain\.com/
/^(.*)@sub\.domain\.com$/ $...@new.sub.domain.com
That first line has no result value.
Wietse
Patric Falinder:
/etc/postfix/recipient_bcc:
/@sub\.domain\.com/
/^(.*)@sub\.domain\.com$/ $...@new.sub.domain.com
Wietse Venema skrev 2010-03-29 14:47:
That first line has no result value.
Patric Falinder:
What should I set the result value to?
I got this example from the mailinglist so I
Louis-David Mitterrand:
Hi,
I am using an (insanely) long pcre (see below) to reject
african/chinese/etc. spam that relays through large ISP's. An now it
seems I have reached a limit. When trying to add a single more
expression with a set of () parens I get this error:
postmap:
Matthias Andree:
and timezone are wrong, timezone name is missing). Interestingly, the time
logged in Received: is correct. I would have hoped that the Date: header
produces the same timestamp as in the Received: header.
...
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ma+direct
Delivered-To:
Robert Bude:
Hi !
Is there a possibility to configure postfix to send an email
notification to the sender and receiver of an email, which is not
accepted because of exceeding the message size limit ?
We have a client, who wants to get notified if someone send him an
email, which was
Mike Hutchinson:
Hello Everyone.
Our company sends out newsletters to people who have subscribed their mail
address in-store (retail). I have been working in attempt to slow down
E-Mail deliveries to Hotmail, as our server attempts deliveries too quickly
and will get blocked by their
Mike Hutchinson:
smtphotmail unix - - - - 3
smtp
Who told you to set a wakeup timer of 3 seconds? Remove it.
No-one did. I had intended to set a max processes limit..
You're right. Hoewever, with smtphotmail...rate_delay, Postfix will
make at most
Simon Waters:
One domain is advertising an MX record of 0.0.0.0 which postfix correctly
reports as numeric domain name in resource data of MX record for ...
Then (on Linux at least), Postfix connects to 0.0.0.0 and then logs a
couple
of messages complaining it is trying to talk to
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:16:28AM +1300, Mike Hutchinson wrote:
What version of Postfix is this?
Postfix mail_version = 2.5.1
The rate control features introduced in 2.5.0 were improved in later
patches, you must upgrade to the latest 2.5 release if you want to
an...@isac.gov.in:
Dear List,
We are using the smtpd-policyd feature from long time to allow some
specific users to receive higher size mails. It is working fine.
But, it does not work when the recipient_count is more than one as we
are comparing the value with recipient.
There
Vernon A. Fort:
The maximal_queue_lifetime-30s was for testing only - its normally set
for 1d. The sole issues is to prevent mail from bouncing back if we
don't get the encrypted volume mounted and cyrus started back up soon
enough. A reasonable example would be if the server rebooted due
Wietse Venema:
Vernon A. Fort:
The maximal_queue_lifetime-30s was for testing only - its normally set
for 1d. The sole issues is to prevent mail from bouncing back if we
don't get the encrypted volume mounted and cyrus started back up soon
enough. A reasonable example would
Emmanuel Fust?:
relay_relayhost = [a.b.c.d]
As always, use postconf -n output when reporting a problem. This
would have revealed immediately that relay_relayhost is a mistake.
Wietse
Emmanuel Fust??:
Le 01/04/2010 15:20, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
Emmanuel Fust?:
relay_relayhost = [a.b.c.d]
As always, use postconf -n output when reporting a problem. This
would have revealed immediately that relay_relayhost is a mistake.
Wietse
Ok so transport_postfix-conf
Stephen Carville:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Stephen Carville
stephen.carvi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there way to have postfix relay _any_ mail from $mynetworks but
still check other mail against the relay_recipient_maps?
I have been forwarding bad addresses to the held desk but the
Glenn English:
On Apr 1, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Were you asking about using Postfix as a proxy in front of internal SMTP
servers, or using firewall reverse-proxy SMTP support to sit in front of
Postfix?
I was asking about Postfix running as a daemon on the firewall
Glenn English:
On Apr 1, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
So why must this be a Postfix-as-proxy, instead of a complete
Postfix-with-queue instance?
Like I said, I'm not at all sure it does. But I'm told that there
should be an SMTP reverse proxy running on the firewall
ram:
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 12:14 +, Simon Waters wrote:
On Thursday 01 April 2010 12:38:29 J.R.Ewing wrote:
Is there any solution?
I have idea to move senders address to reply to field and write new
sender. Is it possible with postfix?
Postfix supports DKIM, DomainKeys, SPF,
Yves Dorfsman:
Hello,
I am using postfix version 2.5.6.
For years I have been using the settings:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination,
permit
This allows relaying only from local clients.
smtpd_client_restrictions =
Josh Cason:
Back to the question. I was looking at a detailed log on postfix. When
it goes through
the list of tests. It rejects everything until it hits
pop-before-smtp. Then it says
okay. When I check the database of ip numbers. It lists my server and
my localhost
127.0.0.1 number.
Yves Dorfsman:
Wietse Venema wrote:
For years I have been using the settings:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination,
permit
This allows relaying only from local clients.
smtpd_client_restrictions
Masao Garcia:
Hello,
I have set up an Ubuntu 8.04 postfix relay that relays mail to and from my
Exchange server. Everything seems to work well enough except that our users
do not receive bounce replies when they send mail to an invalid address
outside our domain. If I tail
Masao Garcia:
Wietse,
Maybe I should re-phrase my question. On my Exchange server, if I e-mail an
invalid address, it will e-mail be back and tell me that the recipient does
not exist. When I e-mail an invalid address using a web/imap/pop hosting
provider, I get an e-mail telling me the
Yves Dorfsman:
Wietse Venema wrote:
There's no reject_unknown_* in there, so this does not reproduce
the complaint.
Right, because I had commented them out in order to make it work. I put them
back, here's the output of postconf -n
It's like sending your brother to the doctor
Masao Garcia:
Wietse,
Okay, I think I know what the problem is. Our reply-to addresses are for a
domain that's not handled (yet) by our mail servers. We are in the middle
of a transition to bringing our e-mail in-house away from an external
pop/imap provider but during the transition we'd
Peer Heinlein:
Hi!
Some mailservers close their session immediatley if the client-IP is
listed on RBLs or expected to come from a dynamic IP-range:
p...@waffel:~ telnet 71.74.56.244 25
Trying 71.74.56.244...
Connected to 71.74.56.244.
Escape character is '^]'.
554 5.7.1 - ERROR: Mail
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa:
Hi!
This is getting interesting. How, exactly, does mailman (or other
mailing list manager) handles this? I mean, I have seen several
SPF-enabled domains, and these domains have subscriptions to one or
more lists... now, reading the headers for one of the
Voytek Eymont:
I just noticed this in the logs, which might be from a valid sender to a
valid user on this server:
Apr 5 11:03:31 postfix/smtpd[31021]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
fep06.mfe.bur.connect.com.au[203.63.86.26]: 554 5.7.1
fep06.mfe.bur.connect.com.au[203.63.86.26]: Client host
Scott Thomson:
Hey Folks,
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. I think it might make the
most sense to start by describing what I'm trying to accomplish first.
Which is this, I have a server that is configured as the host for our
mailman lists (lists.example.org), it also sits
Josh Cason:
The pop-before-smtp has other ip numbers in the list.
Postfix will allow mail from EVERY IP address in the file.
Wietse
mailingli...@belfin.ch:
Hi
is there a way how to customize relocated bounces in a similar fashion
as described in man 5 bounce?
There are no relocated bounce messages. There are bounce,
delayed, success and trace messages.
The content of relocated error (not bounce!) messages is
mailingli...@belfin.ch:
Is there a way to customize the relocated bounce message?
Postfix has configurable bounce, delayed, success and trace
template text.
Postfix has configurable relocated_maps responses.
Postfix appends relocated_maps responses AT THE END of the bounce
delivery status
mailingli...@belfin.ch:
mailingli...@belfin.ch:
Is there a way to customize the relocated bounce message?
Postfix has configurable bounce, delayed, success and trace
template text.
Postfix has configurable relocated_maps responses
...
Talking about bounce templates, Recipient
Robert Lopez:
A postmap -q any-pattern-in-file cidr-ip returns the rest of the
matching line correctly.
This uses the default database type, which is hash: on most systems.
Thus. Postfix opens hash:cidr-ip which results in opening cidr-ip.db.
To query a CIDR file, specify cidr:filename, just
Robert Lopez:
Now that you mention the documentation:
SYNOPSIS
postmap -q string cidr:/etc/postfix/filename
postmap -q - cidr:/etc/postfix/filename inputfile
DESCRIPTION
...
To test lookup tables, use the postmap -q command as
described in the SYNOPSIS
Robert Lopez:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Robert Lopez:
Now that you mention the documentation:
SYNOPSIS
? ? ? ?postmap -q string cidr:/etc/postfix/filename
? ? ? ?postmap -q - cidr:/etc/postfix/filename inputfile
DESCRIPTION
Geoff Sweet:
I having a heck of a time compiling 2.6.5 onto my CentOS 5.4 system (x86)
with SASL support. I can verify that the libssl and libcrypto libraries are
present:
$ ls /usr/lib/libssl.so
/usr/lib/libssl.so
$ ls /usr/lib/libcrypto.so
/usr/lib/libcrypto.so
so I make my
Josh Cason:
I have a dmz zone on my network. The postfix sits behind the dmz zone.
The public IP address is translated (nat) to the dmz zone. I asked
about the proxy interfaces command in the main.cf file. I was told I
needed to put in the public ip address for the server. What does this
Wietse Venema:
Rich Winkel:
Hi, I'm setting up a mail server with dovecot-1.0.13 and
postfix-2.5.1 on freebsd 7.0. I'm a newbie to postfix, I almost
have it running but have two questions:
I'm using dovecot auth-client for sasl authentication. I want it to
reject mail from
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#import_environment
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#export_environment
Wietse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you. I try that some days ago but it didn't work.
It works only if you understand its limitations.
The import_environment feature executes AFTER the run-time linker
completes execution. Therefore, import_environment cannot affect
the run-time linker performance for the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
, postfix reload; and postfix stills working as always.
Show actual evidence of behavior that does not change, and show
actual evidence based on which it should have changed.
Wietse
It's easy. On my modified
Ronald F. Guilmette:
I was just perusing the /var/log/messages file on a system I have
that's currently running Postfix 2.5.1 and I saw the following messages:
Jul 29 19:47:42 roomy postfix/smtpd[72875]: gethostby*.getanswer: asked for
ip200.208-100-19.vswitch.static.steadfast.net IN A,
If you want to control access with MySQL, try http://www.policy.org/
Wietse
Unfortunately (for you), Postfix currently does not use supplementary
groups, anywhere. It's not a quick hack to change this.
Wietse
Tait Grove:
Why would I be getting this error message? I am experiencing message delays
with this too.
Aug 4 22:46:56 app1 postfix/pipe[54935]: fatal: watchdog timeout
Aug 4 22:48:21 app1 postfix/pipe[54454]: fatal: watchdog timeout
Aug 4 22:50:22 app1 postfix/pipe[55545]:
Ebbe Hjorth:
Hi,
On of my users asked me about, why she got an error sending mail with
attachment in squirrelmail, i dont know - but the thing i want to ask you
about, is that the reciever got 2 emails, one with no attachments and one
with.
Postfix cannot remove attachments.
Richard Wolterink:
Aug 5 18:37:36 vps683 postfix/bounce[15429]: warning: unexpected
attribute W from bounce socket (expecting: nrequest)
Aug 5 18:37:36 vps683 postfix/bounce[15429]: warning: malformed request
In master.cf you have turned on the wakeup timer for the bounce service.
See: man
Richard Wolterink:
tlsmgrunix - - - 10? 1 tlsmgr
flush unix n - - 10? 0 flush
Undo these changes. They are detrimental to Postfix performance.
Wietse
Richard Wolterink:
Wietse Venema schreef:
Richard Wolterink:
tlsmgrunix - - - 10? 1 tlsmgr
flush unix n - - 10? 0 flush
Undo these changes. They are detrimental to Postfix performance.
Wietse
Do I
Aaron Bennett:
Hello,
I'm experiencing very poor performance on receipt of email with large
numbers of multiple recipients. One particular listserv for example
sends emails to 1600+ users in chunks of 50-60 per message. Users are
either local (maildir) or forwarded. We do have three
Seblu:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seblu:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Hello,
i use postfix postfix 2.5.1 on an OpenBSD 4.3 and i have a stange
behaviour (for me) with DNS lookup in logs.
i've a local dns, which
Graham Leggett:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Hi all,
I have a machine that is both a postfix mailserver, and a NAT router for
a number of machines behind the box.
Because traffic from machines behind the box can cause the mailserver's
IP to be blacklisted, the
Sahil Tandon:
Jason Drage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All, I'm having trouble locking down relaying and I can't see what
I'm doing wrong.
I'm trying to configure the server to only send mail iff:
1. Sender is on mynetworks, or
2. Sender is authenticated
Everything else should
Jamie Bohr:
I already have a program that works externally from Postfix. It is
getting it to work from within Postfix that is the issue. Even the
script from http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html#simple_filter
does not work. I think there is something I need to set something in
Marcelo Iturbe:
I did a test via telnet and after I end data with CRLF.CRLF I get
the 250 Ok: queued message around 10 to 20 seconds afterwards.
Since you gave zero configuration information, you can try for
the following yourself:
1) You have a broken before-queue content filter.
2) Your
1401 - 1500 of 13189 matches
Mail list logo
