J.D. Bronson:
At 08:34 AM 8/9/2008 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
This is not surprising. Maybe -ldb41 will work. Maybe it will blow
up when something else wants to use the default Berkeley DB.
What problem are you trying to solve? Is there a problem with the
default Berkeley DB library
Jordi Moles Blanco:
the communication with postfix is done by using the function
reinjecta_mail i've also attached.
is there anything wrong that postfix can't understand and therefore
crashes?
YOUR PROGRAM crashes, not Postfix. Do not blame the messenger who
brings the bad news.
Justin Piszcz:
Regarding the timeout...
Aug 11 19:02:23 p34 postfix/smtpd[19254]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Aug 11 19:02:23 p34 postfix/smtpd[19254]: disconnect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
That is the SMTP server, the program that RECEIVES
Robert Cohen:
ul 27 12:43:23 mailin2 postfix/smtp[29137]: 4CBB07E8009:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10025, delay=137638,
delays=137638/0/0/0, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] while sending message body)
The filter hangs up because it
Robert Cohen:
So if a filter botches handling one message, postfix gives on sending it
anything for up to 15 minutes?
That doesn't seem like a particularly graceful way of handling filter
failure.
When a destination suffers from a PERSISTENT FAILURE (i.e. your
content filter is dropping
Vince Sabio:
I upgraded my FreeBSD server to v7.0-RELEASE -- everything seems to
be running fine *except* for postfix. When I start postfix, I get:
ares-root# postfix start
postfix/postfix-script: warning: damaged message: corrupt/AE0AB49AF76
postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix
David K. Means:
I can originate mail from this server (using mail [EMAIL PROTECTED])
which is accepted and delivered properly; this works
both as a normal user, and as root.
When I attempt a similar operation from within a PHP script (running
under Apache httpd), the mail is not
Ronald F. Guilmette:
Pretend I'm an idiot. (For most people who know me this won't be hard.)
Could somebody please explain to me... in a way that takes into account
my idiocy... what this strict_mime_encoding_domain option actually does,
i.e. if you turn it on?
It stops some malformed
sharad kanekar:
Dear All,
I configured Postfix 2.3.3-2 on CentOS 5.2. But I am unable
to send receive mails. I want to use ISP as relay host
To send mail using the ISP as relay host, use the main.cf:relayhost
parameter. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relayhost
To
Robert Cohen:
However, the fact that the milter was fine, and postfix wouldn't process
mails made it appear that postfix was the one with the problem.
Cycling power would also have solved the problem. That also does
not prove that the problem was with the hardware.
The Milter was obviously
Zbigniew Szalbot:
Hello,
I am debugging a faulty operation of dkim-filter and have been asked
whether I can capture/quarantine the message(s) which are in progress
at the time of the crash.
Is this possible with postifx? I looked at the main.cf parameters but
have not seen anything
Gaby Vanhegan:
I'm trying to find out the source of a delay in postfix processing
some mail. I have a web app that sends a notification email to users
but there is a delay when PHP calls the mail() function. I remove the
call to mail() and the delay goes away. I turned on
trilemma:
Hello,
For the policy delegation protocol described in [1] I need some clarification:
1. Is reverse_client_name always present as an attribute?
3. Is client_name always present as an attribute?
The protocol has evolved over time. Whether or not a specific
attribute will be
Patrick Ben Koetter:
A reasonable setting is:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
This allows any available mechanism except for anonymous, as it is highly
exploitable in the context of SMTP. (It's usable in the context of FTP or IMAP
shared folder access).
Another reasonable
Vince Sabio:
I suspect that I actually have two different versions of postfix
installed -- and different commands are being executed by different
versions. Any idea how to fix this without breaking things farther?
Indeed. Some maintainers change the default config_directory
from /etc/postfix
Vince Sabio:
Time for:
# find / -name postfix -ls
ares-root# find / -name postfix -ls
11620504 drwxr-xr-x2 root wheel512 Feb 4 2004
/usr/libexec/postfix
...
7546444 drwxr-xr-x2 root wheel512 Aug 15 01:46
/usr/local/libexec/postfix
...
Etc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I tried to get my own delivery transport agent. It works perfectly.
But I get no address verification to work.
virtual_mailbox_domains = testmail2.dyndns.org
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail/obsolete # I'm forced to put this line?
virtual_mailbox_maps =
Blake Carver:
I'm trying to help someone with Postfix, and it looks like this one is
a few versions behind. They say that they're not sure if it was
isntalled Via RPM or a source tarball. This is a RHEL5 server. It's
set up to use Dovecot and MySQL. There are RPMs listed as installed
(rpm
Jeff:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff:
It took me a while before I could test this. The recommended solution
succeeds at blocking the specified aliases when relayed through our
gateway, but it does not do so at the SMTP level. It generates
Jeff:
I want the back-end to tell the front-end gateway 550 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but I want it to tell my other internal MTAs OK,
whilst not breaking regular recipient verification.
Reject [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the FRONT_END host.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access
Jeff:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff:
I want the back-end to tell the front-end gateway 550 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but I want it to tell my other internal MTAs OK,
whilst not breaking regular recipient verification.
Reject [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bj?rn T Johansen:
Aug 20 12:36:44 web postfix/pipe[2802]: 88AC71FA25F: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
relay=dovecot, delay=0.09, delays=0.07/0/0/0.02, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced
(mail forwarding loop for [EMAIL PROTECTED])
You are sending mail with
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
into the pipe
Santiago Romero:
Santiago Romero wrote:
Solved! I noticed that the undefined symbols were correctly defined in
libsasl1, so I thought that the problem was the library not being linked
in. So:
I changed:
make makefiles CCARGS=-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -lsasl
make
That is
Santiago Romero:
make makefiles CCARGS=-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -lsasl
make
That is not the correct syntax. See the INSTALL file.
What's wrong? The -lsasl statement?
See the INSTALL file. Also on-line as http://www.postfix.org/INSTALL.html
See also the
James:
I added a header check to reject empty subjects.
The error from the server for an empty subject is:
Server replied: 550 5.7.1 message content rejected
Can I change it to say empty subject rejected?
Yes. The REJECT action allows you to specify text.
Wietse
Bj?rn T Johansen:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Bj?rn T Johansen:
Aug 20 12:36:44 web postfix/pipe[2802]: 88AC71FA25F: to=[EMAIL
PROTECTED], relay=dovecot, delay=0.09,
delays=0.07/0/0/0.02, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail
Tait Grove:
A handful of my email users are getting an error message from external
servers mailing to our servers. This error occurs when you change the letter
case in the email address. Example, if you send from Yahoo! to my server
using the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] the email will go
Ronald F. Guilmette:
I'd like to propose a small enhancement for the Policy Server protocol.
I'll code up a first cut of it, if nobody else is willing.
Basically, I think it would be very useful if the protcol included a
line like:
trusted_client=[yes/no]
where the value would
Ronald F. Guilmette:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Ronald F. Guilmette:
I'd like to propose a small enhancement for the Policy Server protocol.
I'll code up a first cut of it, if nobody else is willing.
Basically, I think it would
Tait Grove:
Aug 20 15:49:02 post-app2 postfix/smtpd[23676]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
ug-out-1314.google.com[66.249.92.174]: 450 4.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Recipient address rejected: unverified address: Address verification in
progress; from=[EMAIL PROTECTED] to=[EMAIL PROTECTED] proto=ESMTP
Ronald F. Guilmette:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wietse wrote:
Ronald F. Guilmette:
client_in_my_networks=[yes/no]
That might work (under a better name) but it should not encourage
requests to simply dump all the low-level Postfix predicates in
the policy protocol:
Well, it's
Darrell A. Sullivan, II:
I am trying to implement TLS on our server for a client requirement. I
believe I have the TLS settings correct, but I am not certain about what I
am seeing in the logs and I am uncertain as to how to know if a message was
delivered using TLS.
Is there anything in
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matem?tica:
I wrote down the following regular expression, would it work properly?!
if /^[ ]*From:(.*)(cmat\.edu\.uy)/
if /^[ ]*Message-ID/
!/^[ ]*Message-ID:(.*)(cmat\.edu\.uy)/
REJECT Message-ID and From incorrect
endif
endif
AS DOCUMENTED, the above
Max Zimmermann:
Hey there,
I hope I'm right asking you this, and hope I can explain my problem
correctly.
I'm not receiving to many spam mails on my server. With all
postfix-internal sender- and helo restrictions and some RBLs enabled,
spam for me has come down to only a few mails that
Michael G. Reed:
I've been looking around to see how I can deal with a
particular site that doesn't report a FQDN in the HELO/EHLO line. I
have smtpd_recipient_restrictions containing:
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_non_fqdn_recipient
reject_non_fqdn_hostname
Michael G. Reed:
Worked like a champ. (for anyone else interested, put OK
for dunno below and you're good to go :). Thanks!
DO NOT PUT OK THERE!!! YOU MAY BECOME AN OPEN RELAY!!
Wietse
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
| Wietse Venema:
| Michael G. Reed
Len Conrad:
tail -f -100 /var/log/maillog | awk 'tolower ($0) ~ /exceeded/ {print
$3, $11, $13 }'
07:18:18 391 unknown[unknown]
07:18:18 392 unknown[unknown]
07:18:19 394 unknown[unknown]
07:18:20 395 unknown[unknown]
07:18:21 396 unknown[unknown]
07:18:26 397 unknown[unknown]
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Aaron D. Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm seeing a strange behavior where smtpd_recipient_restrictions are
being applied to mail received over the network but not to mail sent
from local unix mail ( or from squirrelmail which is using
/usr/bin/sendmail ).
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
* Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Aaron D. Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm seeing a strange behavior where smtpd_recipient_restrictions are
being applied to mail received over
Stefan Palme:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Thanks for all your answers. My first approach to just throw
away all bounces caused by senseless data entered into a web
form is obviously too naive ;-)
I guess I will go the way to collect bounces by a script and
establish an
Jim McIver:
My header_checks file contains:
# Disallow sender-specified routing. This is a must if you relay mail
#for other domains.
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@]/ 550 Sender-specified routing rejected
# Postmaster is OK, that way they can talk to us about how
# to fix their problem.
Wietse Venema:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
Simple question: How much RAM does a process actually use?
But how to find out? There's copy on write, shared libraries, shared
memory, and whatever.
With Linux, parse /proc/pid/map for each process. This gives you
the memory mapping. Writable mappings
Luca Cazzaniga:
I'm running postfix on a host behind a firewall which performs a port
address translation of the port 25 on the inbound connections, whilst the
outbound connection gets a nat to a extranet address.
The daemon supplies smtp service for the local network. An intranet dns
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Hi,
I am running Postfix 2.5.1 with OpenSSL on an email gateway and I
configured the mailer to use STARTTLS whenever it is possible.
My config works fine *receiving* emails and I therefore receive TLS
mails. I
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eduardo_J=FAnior?=:
Hi,
I was reading in [1] and I do not have much experience with Postfix I came
the following questions:
In smtpd_sender_restrictions session, for example, he lists some settings
possible.
These settings for each session are limited to those listed?
Chris St Denis:
What is the maximum number of addresses to have in a multi-recipient
alias? I realize a real mailing list system like majordomo or mailman is
better for large numbers but I need to use aliases for now 'till I have
time to set it up and need to know how many I can use before
Diego Ledesma:
Hello.
A few weeks ago and out of the blue i started getting some messages deferred
at random times.
Aug 28 18:44:30 mailserver postfix/qmgr[13315]: EDD5B3505B4: from=
[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=14529, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Aug 28 19:04:30 mailserver postfix/smtp[27936]:
Diego Ledesma:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diego Ledesma:
Hello.
A few weeks ago and out of the blue i started getting some messages
deferred
at random times.
Aug 28 18:44:30 mailserver postfix/qmgr[13315]: EDD5B3505B4: from
Stefan Palme:
Hi all,
Today seems to be postfix day, so sorry for the bulk of questions ;-)
When I receive a mail with only ONE envelope recipient, postfix
inserts a mail header of the form
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with
Stefan Palme:
Is there a way to enforce postfix to always insert a from ... part
on its Received: header?
Of course I meant for... part...
No, that would violate the privacy of BCC recipients.
Why? The normal recipient (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would get a mail with
You were
Rob Kelledy:
I have a bunch of mail being deferring with no available mx (mainly
typos).
What is the result of:
$ host -t mx example.com
$ host -t a example.com
With a suitable substitution for example.com.
If the DNS server says that BOTH the MX and A records don't exist,
Postfix will
Rich Shepard:
My wife uses her laptop connected wirelessly to the network, but sending
mail has failed since I upgraded postfix to 2.5.2 and enabled SASL
authorization. Thunderbird keeps asking for her password on the server when
she tries to send mail (incoming mail reaches her inbox with
Per Jessen:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Wietse Venema wrote:
Whilst on the subject of connection caching, I assume postfix will
(have
to) do a RSET between each reuse of a connection? (just a sanity
check on my part).
Of course. See http://www.postfix.org
Matthew Crowe:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Hi,
Running 2 servers, different locations geographically. I'd like to have
them both store emails for a domain locally, and transfer them between
each other. The virtual_alias_maps/domains are stored in a mysql db
thats
Mark Watts:
Is there a mechanism to reduce/stop the logging that anvil does?
No. Anvil logs something when it terminates (Postfix is not receiving
mail), and it logs something every 10 minutes or so when Postfix
is busy.
I have a low-traffic mail server and I'd prefer anvil to not log anything
Stefan Palme:
Hi all,
will an incoming message be sent through the specified smtpd_milters
BEFORE or AFTER smtpd_recipient_restrictions tests are be applied?
I did not found any hint regarding this in the docs.
http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html Look under content inspection
Jim Garrison:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
I maintain an old Fedora Core 5 system that I'm going to be
updating to Fedora 9 -- I'll be rebuilding from scratch and
copying over the config. The FC5 system has Postfix 2.2.8,
and the new system will have 2.5.1.
Can anyone
Rajkumar S:
Hi,
While searching for the functionality for per client recipient rate
limit, I stumbled upon the mail by Wietse about
smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit_maps at
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-10/0770.html and
another user asking for the same feature at
An on-line version of this announcement is available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/20080902.html
Summary:
Postfix 2.4 and later, on Linux kernel 2.6, is vulnerable to a
denial of service attack by a local user. There is no breach of
data confidentiality or data integrity. This
Andre H?bner:
Hi,
i successfully compiled and packaged postfix 2.5.5 on suse 10.1 with
gcc 4.1.2
Now i try same with suse 8.2 and gcc 3.3
Testcompile with simple: make tidy results in
make tidy
make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles
(echo # Do not edit -- this file documents
Mark Goodge:
I see from the documentation that the current default of
hash_queue_names is only to hash the defer and deferred directories, in
contrast to versions prior to 2.2 where pretty much everything was hash
queued. The documentation has this to say about the reason for the change:
Andre H?bner:
Sorry, make tidy is always successful. This proves nothing.
not always, this is the reason for writing to this list ;)
errormessages sent in 1. mail are result of make tidy
That is incorrect.
This was your problem report:
1 make tidy
2 make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL=
Matthew Riedel:
Dear Postfix Community,
I have a bit of a conundrum that I can't seem to find an answer to in any of
the documentation (and believe me, I've poured over it). Below is our
somewhat sparse output of postconf -n.
The problem is this: We currently have two machines accepting
Joakim Ohlsson:
Hi,
This is first time I use this mailing-list, so please let me know if I do
anything wrong.
My problem is that I want to send bounced messages to an different mail
address than the mail-address in the MAIL FROM: field.
This is by definition (i.e. RFC 821 and RFC 2821) the
Joakim Ohlsson:
Hi,
This is first time I use this mailing-list, so please let me know if I do
anything wrong.
My problem is that I want to send bounced messages to an different mail
address than the mail-address in the MAIL FROM: field.
This is by definition (i.e. RFC 821 and RFC
mouss:
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
- try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
This way, you can ignore bounces
Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
because parsing the logs is trivial compared
Sahil Tandon:
Victor Duchovni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not all the messages will be in the active queue, so * is not
the right delimeter.
This is why, above, I wrote _if_ the OP wants to HOLD messages in the
_active_ queue.
Better tools than cut have been posted before.
DJ Lucas:
Erik Paulsen Skaalerud wrote:
The weird part: EHLO doesnt mention AUTH at all, but if I type AUTH
LOGIN it responds with 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6, AUTH PLAIN and AUTH
CRAM-MD5 also responds with similar challenges.
Interesting. I have the same 'issue' on my home server; AUTH is not
DJ Lucas:
Erik Paulsen Skaalerud wrote:
The weird part: EHLO doesnt mention AUTH at all, but if I type AUTH
LOGIN it responds with 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6, AUTH PLAIN and AUTH
CRAM-MD5 also responds with similar challenges.
Interesting. I have the same 'issue' on my home server; AUTH is not
I narrowed down the problem to this config value:
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
All problems are reported to logfile.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Wietse
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any ideas what causes these?
Jul 21 23:14:43 kd1 postfix/qmgr[20699]: warning: F320A29569: rcpt count
mismatch (-2)
...
Version is postfix-2.3.r8,3 (FreeBSD port)
This problem was removed by a code reorganization in Postfix 2.4,
when I added support for message body
Devdas Bhagat:
The last error messages I get are these:
Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]: warning: problem
talking to service private/scache:
Wietse Venema:
Devdas Bhagat:
The last error messages I get are these:
Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]: warning: problem
talking
Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
Devdas Bhagat:
The last error messages I get are these:
Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]: warning
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 03:31:29PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
The master daemon triggers qmgr and pickup regularly. That trigger
write is non-blocking with a timeout of 1, so it cannot block the
master daemon. Except of course when the kernel is messed up.
Hmm
Travis:
It turns out that my software (tinyca2) as well as the normal
openssl genrsa -des3 -rand /etc/hosts -out smtpd.key 1024
(suggested here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Postfix)
both prompt for passwords with which to encrypt the key.
See instructions at the end of
Wietse Venema:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any ideas what causes these?
Jul 21 23:14:43 kd1 postfix/qmgr[20699]: warning: F320A29569: rcpt count
mismatch (-2)
...
Version is postfix-2.3.r8,3 (FreeBSD port)
This problem was removed by a code reorganization in Postfix 2.4,
when I added
Andrea Gozzi:
To be clearer: I want to set up a domain, myfreemail.com, where the
spammers will have their accounts. They will be able to log-in with a
webmail client and receive correctly any email addressed to them (unless
caught by SA, but that's another story).
What they will
Andrea Gozzi:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
It works, thanks.
I have one further question: how do I restrict access to postfix for any
user with @myfreemail.com account only from localhost (where the webmail
is running)?
The answer depends on how
Chris Morley:
Dear all, With CentOS 5.2 i am trying to get Postfix working on Port 125 (
-or other it can be any port) such that ASSP can forward to that MTA instance
- for relaying, however i followed the Postfix tutorial on the ASSP wiki and
-i get the following error in /var/log/maillog:
Kenneth Kalmer:
Hi all
I've spent a couple of hours Googling the topic before posting, and couldn't
find anything really useful yet.
I need a way to save copies of email headers for later analysis, not the
entire message. Is this possible out the box, with an addon, a separate
piece of
Karl O. Pinc:
What should happen, and what does happen a lot, is that the smtpd side
eventually receives a QUIT, responds with a 221, and closes the
connection. (At least I assume that's what's happening.) However,
sometimes, ps shows that the awk process has finished, is gone and
does not
Rob Becker:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
I have a postfix relay that's currently having some issues with some
spam content that we are receiving. Every hour or so we are receiving
300 - 600 messages with in a few seconds. A lot of the email messages
have malformed TO
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:09:16PM +1000, Colin Campbell wrote:
Hi,
Can someone explain why we saw the following in our logs?
Sep 4 19:50:32 postfix postfix/cleanup[18097]: A68A6220005: message-id=:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sep 4 19:50:32 postfix
Karl O. Pinc:
On 09/10/2008 06:14:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Karl O. Pinc:
When there's more than one subscriber the same thing
happens for mail sent to the first subscriber, but
then the same message is sent to the second subscriber.
Again, smtp sends a DATA command, gets back
Andrea Gozzi:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:25 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Andrea Gozzi:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
It works, thanks.
I have one further question: how do I restrict access to postfix for
any
user with @myfreemail.com
Nicolas Haller:
Hi all,
I have a little problem with Postfix. I have a Postfix server acting as
fallback_relay. This box have a big queue (between 1 and 10
mails). The box is under FreeBSD and all is ok except this message I see
in syslog:
postfix/qmgr[52291]: fatal: socket: Too
Try:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot
If this fixes the problem PLEASE COMPLAIN TO THE UBUNTU POSTFIX MAINTAINER.
Wietse
Noel Jones:
Maybe you can simply not offer DSN support to them when they
send mail to you.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps
The table entry would look like this, note the key must be an
IP, not a hostname:
ip.of.bad.client dsn, silent-discard
Robert Schetterer:
Wietse Venema schrieb:
Noel Jones:
Maybe you can simply not offer DSN support to them when they
send mail to you.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps
The table entry would look like this, note the key must be an
IP
Noel Jones:
Seems more likely they are choking on the null sender address.
You can use the setup described above with smtp_generic_maps
to replace the null sender with something else. This breaks
RFCs - DSNs MUST be sent with the null sender.
-o
Ian Masters:
Hello,
I've set up a local mail server with Postfix 2.3.3 and Dovecot 1.0.7 on
CentOS 5.2.
This is the first time I've used Postfix.
I can send and receive local mail which, for the moment, is fine.
When I tried to send a mail to an external mail address, the delivery
gishaust:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
hi everyone,
I have been trying to telnet from my linux laptop using the following
command
telnet 192.***.***.*** 25
and the host keeps shutting me down I know it is something to postfix
but I don't
know why? but if I
ram:
My milter is quiet simple. It just does a bsearch on a in-memory array ,
to find if the recipient has blacklisted / whitelisted the sender and
takes action accordingly
The array now has approx 200k elements, which should be nothing for
4GBRam box
What measures did you take to avoid
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:08:55AM -0300, jakjr wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have one big distribution list (100K emails). I'm using virtual_alias_maps
for that like this:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
where virtual:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Karl O. Pinc:
This exchange has been like pulling teeth. Is there
something wrong with the way I'm interacting with
the list or something I can do differently to make
things easier in the future?
The approach was like going to a doctor with your diagnosis already
done, and without allowing
ram:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
My milter is quiet simple. It just does a bsearch on a in-memory array ,
to find if the recipient has blacklisted / whitelisted the sender and
takes action accordingly
The array now has approx 200k elements
Peter Rabbitson:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Peter Rabbitson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I need to protect a specific local address by defining a very low
message_size_limit applicable only to this particular address.
Not possible in general.
Peter Rabbitson:
Hi,
I encountered a weird behavior with Postfix when specifying
smtp:localhost as a transport destination. After long debugging, tcpdump
revealed that postfix directly asks for 'localhost.local dns suffix',
as specified in /etc/hosts:search without first asking for
Peter Rabbitson:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Peter Rabbitson:
Hi,
I encountered a weird behavior with Postfix when specifying
smtp:localhost as a transport destination. After long debugging, tcpdump
revealed that postfix directly asks for 'localhost.local dns suffix',
as specified in /etc
1501 - 1600 of 13187 matches
Mail list logo
