Le 19/09/2011 07:34, Michael Ribbons a écrit :
I have ruled out the amavis setup.
What I need is a way to specify sender_bcc_maps only if the mail is sent from
an authenticated user - This may be achievable by having a separate cleanup
process for submission, but
I don't want to use
Le 16/09/2011 16:45, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
Le vendredi 16 septembre 2011 00:12, mouss a écrit :
Le 15/09/2011 03:34, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
hello list
hello guru of postfix
I think I have correctly configure bind for IPv6. but I still can not
connect with telnet on my
Le 15/09/2011 03:34, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
hello list
hello guru of postfix
I think I have correctly configure bind for IPv6. but I still can not connect
with telnet on my server
all testimonials are welcome
well, it is hard or us to see what bind have to do with can not
Le 15/09/2011 17:17, Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit :
Hi,
I need to change the disks on my postfix machine and i do not have a
spare machine, so i'll basically take out the old disk, put the new ones
and reinstall the machine.
in that scenario, is it OK to backup the
Le 15/09/2011 23:07, Michael C. Robinson a écrit :
I've looked at emails I've been setting aside and have noticed that
there are 5 received from lines that my servers post. The one I
probably want is posted first when the external SMTP server contacts my
relay. After that, my server passes
Le 14/09/2011 09:33, n3mesi83 a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I have a java web application that uses JavaMail to send messages with
attached documents (spreadsheets). On the server (Ubuntu 10.4 64-bit) I
installed postfix to send email. The server has a static address and I
connect to it via
Le 13/09/2011 00:04, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-09-12 06:21, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a disclaimer footer using altermime with
postfix-2.7.5, amavisd-new-2.6.4. I've tried to follow the examples
for creating a new filter, but the messages appear to be being
reinjected
Le 12/09/2011 06:21, Alex a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a disclaimer footer using altermime with
postfix-2.7.5, amavisd-new-2.6.4. I've tried to follow the examples
for creating a new filter, but the messages appear to be being
reinjected at the wrong spot and are being delivered
Le 18/08/2011 14:53, Carlos Mennens a écrit :
Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
below:
**
According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an
Le 18/08/2011 01:31, Steve Fatula a écrit :
- Original Message -
From: Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
To: Postfix Users postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:18 PM
Subject: Remove header on reinjection
Sounded easy (and probably is), but, don't
Le 15/08/2011 17:29, Drizzt a écrit :
Hi,
I have a setup whereby we check for spoofing. That is, anyone using an
envelope from in our domain is blocked. In a similar fashion we stop our
own hosts from spoofing others.
For reference:
- external spoofing:
check_sender_access: mysql
Le 20/07/2011 07:32, Thomas Zehbe a écrit :
Am Dienstag 19 Juli 2011, 22:20:25 schrieb mouss:
Le 19/07/2011 09:05, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-19 00:31, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 19:01, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-17 20:19, mouss wrote:
Le 17/07/2011 12:49, Thomas Zehbe
Le 26/07/2011 23:07, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:24:23PM +0200, mouss wrote:
He's only running one postfix smtpd, the other host in the above log is
bitdefender.
The simplest would be to change the hostname of either postfix or
bitdefender, whichever makes more
Le 20/07/2011 22:15, Peter Tselios a écrit :
Well, since I plan to move into the Postfix wagon, from scratch, I want to
learn more about the 587 port submission and the blockage of port 25 for
that. What are the best practices on the matter? Are there any documents on
that? Soren how do you
Le 20/07/2011 00:03, Kendall Shaw a écrit :
On 07/19/2011 01:32 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 19/07/2011 22:00, Kendall Shaw a écrit :
Your setup is ok, but your test is not...
you have defined virtual_transport to be dovecot, but this only applies
to virtual_mailbox_domains.
you didn't explicitely
Le 19/07/2011 01:53, Robert Schmid a écrit :
On Jul 18, 2011, at 5:47 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 21:41, Robert Schmid a écrit :
Ever since I discovered wildcard addressing in qmail (recipient delimiters
in postfix) I have been using them to identify which companies and
organizations
Le 19/07/2011 09:05, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-19 00:31, mouss wrote:
Le 18/07/2011 19:01, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-17 20:19, mouss wrote:
Le 17/07/2011 12:49, Thomas Zehbe a écrit :
Hello List,
I have an installtion using bitdefender as a virus scanner using
Le 19/07/2011 22:00, Kendall Shaw a écrit :
Hello,
I am using postfix 2.7.2, dovecot 2.0.8 and fetchmail 6.3.17 from
pkgsrc on netbsd 5.1 x86 on my home LAN. I am sorry if this turns out
to be a fetchmail or dovecot question.
I want to have messages filtered using sieve in dovecot, but
Le 18/07/2011 19:01, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 2011-07-17 20:19, mouss wrote:
Le 17/07/2011 12:49, Thomas Zehbe a écrit :
Hello List,
I have an installtion using bitdefender as a virus scanner using the
content_filter option.
bitdefender's smtp daemon listens on port 10025, in main.cf
Le 18/07/2011 19:40, Søren Schrøder a écrit :
I'm doing a 1.5M accounts setup with smtp-auth (submission tcp/587 using
postfix with dovecot-auth) and a plain smtp/25 for an allowed range of IP's
for our fixed IP customers
The backend is openldap/postfix/dovecot
are you a (relatively)
Le 18/07/2011 20:47, Steve Fatula a écrit :
Having read quite a few of the messages in this list about bounces, I really
didn't find any (though they may be there) related to preventing bounces for
resource limits, and other unpredictable and strange occurrences. That is my
question, NOT
Le 18/07/2011 21:41, Robert Schmid a écrit :
Ever since I discovered wildcard addressing in qmail (recipient delimiters in
postfix) I have been using them to identify which companies and organizations
sell my address. In each case, if I give my email address to foo.com, I send
it
Le 18/07/2011 23:38, Pablo Chamorro a écrit :
Could somebody please tell me if it's possible to setup Postfix in order to
make the reception date is shown instead of the email-messages sent-date?
The Date: header is defined by the standard as the date the message is
sent. do not fight
Le 18/07/2011 23:50, Thomas von Eyben a écrit :
Hi List,
I have been searching google and man pages etc. but been unable to
find the answer so far.
I have an e-mailaddress (a group) that it's currently only possible to
send e-mail to from the local users, this is achieved with the
Le 17/07/2011 12:49, Thomas Zehbe a écrit :
Hello List,
I have an installtion using bitdefender as a virus scanner using the
content_filter option.
bitdefender's smtp daemon listens on port 10025, in main.cf therefore this is
defined:
content_filter = smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025
In
Le 15/07/2011 22:15, l...@airstreamcomm.net a écrit :
We are an ISP of about 60,000 customers, and in the past our systems were
setup to allow networks from mynetworks (a large number of IPs) as well as
a lookup table that allows users who have previously popped the server to
relay mail. We
Le 14/07/2011 13:21, Axel Braun a écrit :
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
What is the problem? How can I enable SSL additionally?
p@p:~$ grep smtps /etc/services
ssmtp 465/tcp smtps # SMTP over SSL
Thanks. I added the entra, restartet
Le 15/07/2011 11:15, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 15.07.2011 11:02, schrieb mouss:
STARTTLS is the standard. so clients are encouraged to use it, so that
one day we will be able to get rid of the non standard smtps (whishful
thinking?)
what is in case of 465 non-standard?
[root@srv
Le 13/07/2011 19:04, motty.cruz a écrit :
Hi All, can anyone advise on how to effectively fight backscatter email.
Below a typical header of the tons of backscatter email users get a day
Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON
X-Original-To: u...@domain.tld
Delivered-To: u...@domain.tld
Received: from
Le 13/07/2011 18:22, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 13.07.2011 17:07, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
- all mail sent with our addresses in From: but not originating from
us (or mail server is in-house, one server with one IP)
This would be a mistake. For example, you'd never see your own posts to
Le 12/07/2011 06:16, jeffrey starin a écrit :
I am trying to use the smtp_bind_address command so that three seperate ips
can be used for 3 separate clients who are using email campaign software as
explained in this howto:
Le 07/07/2011 13:44, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
On 7/7/2011 5:58 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:36:02AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I received a request to ignore IPv4 addresses as well in order to
improve performance. But given the extensive IF loops it seems
we'd only save
Le 06/07/2011 23:14, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 7/6/2011 3:57 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 06/07/2011 22:52, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 7/6/2011 3:44 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 06/07/2011 07:07, Simon Deziel a écrit :
Hi all,
Since I started using Stan's fqrdns.pcre file to reduce spam I have some
problems
Le 07/07/2011 21:23, Jeffrey Starin a écrit :
I am using Postfix verions 2.3.3 on a VPS managed by Plesk.
There are two static IPs associated with my install, let's call them
aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd and sss.ttt.uuu.vvv
When I run ifconfig I see the two interface venet0:0 and venet0:1
Mail goes
Le 07/07/2011 22:48, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:35:56PM +0200, mouss wrote:
/^[0-9\.]$/
is equivalent to
any string formed with digits and/or dots
No, just any single character that is a digit or .. You left off the
* or + to make it a string composed
Le 06/07/2011 07:07, Simon Deziel a écrit :
Hi all,
Since I started using Stan's fqrdns.pcre file to reduce spam I have some
problems receiving emails from with IPv6 clients.
replace
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/fqrdns.pcre
with
check_reverse_client_hostname_access
Le 06/07/2011 15:13, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 7/6/2011 2:32 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:38:05AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 7/6/2011 12:07 AM, Simon Deziel wrote:
Hi all,
Since I started using Stan's fqrdns.pcre file to reduce spam I have some
problems receiving emails
Le 05/07/2011 20:38, John Clark a écrit :
I've been tasked with catching several bounce-back conditions (no longer
subscriber, connection refused, host not found, email address invalid, etc)
and adding the offending email address from our email server's messaging
list to prevent poisoning our
Le 06/07/2011 22:52, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 7/6/2011 3:44 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 06/07/2011 07:07, Simon Deziel a écrit :
Hi all,
Since I started using Stan's fqrdns.pcre file to reduce spam I have some
problems receiving emails from with IPv6 clients.
replace
check_client_access pcre
Le 28/06/2011 12:24, Jerry a écrit :
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:59:43 +0200
mouss articulated:
Le 28/06/2011 00:25, Jerry a écrit :
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema articulated:
Jerry:
I saw a configuration for blocking web mail from Apache from
accessing Postfix. I
Le 29/06/2011 01:07, Jay G. Scott a écrit :
Hello,
This machine has a list of legitimate users but does not deliver
mail locally. (It's a mail gateway.)
Presently user schumi gets copies of his mail delivered to three
systems. The three destinations are listed in
Le 29/06/2011 10:40, Paweł Ch. a écrit :
Hi list,
How to forward mails when:
a) mail is from domain sender.domain.tld
and
b) mail is send to u...@mydomain.tld
you can't do that directly in postfix. postfix rules (generally) apply
to a single parameter. in your case, that would be per
Le 28/06/2011 18:54, Bartłomiej Solarz-Niesłuchowski a écrit :
W dniu 2011-06-28 03:12, mouss pisze:
Le 27/06/2011 21:14, Bartłomiej Solarz-Niesłuchowski a écrit :
Good mornig!
We want to block any mail locally seded from apache account.
Many years ago we set in main.cf
Le 27/06/2011 01:35, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 6/26/2011 3:12 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Georg Sauthoffgsaut...@sdf.org:
Since procmail(1), and other utilities need to be able to forward mail
while retaining the original envelope sender address, restricting the
envelope sender address in
Le 27/06/2011 21:14, Bartłomiej Solarz-Niesłuchowski a écrit :
Good mornig!
We want to block any mail locally seded from apache account.
Many years ago we set in main.cf:
authorized_submit_users = !apache,static:all
but after upgrading postfix from 2.7.4 to 2.8.3
this option suddenly
Le 22/06/2011 22:07, Zhou, Yan a écrit :
Hi there,
(This is indeed a postfix question).
I am using Postfix and DoveCot together, and my /etc/postfix/master.cf
looks like this: (using DoveCot LDA to deliver to user mailboxes)
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
Le 24/06/2011 17:43, Jon Miller a écrit :
Hi,
Stress is probably getting the best of me at the moment since I've been
trying to get thi sdamn thing back on line since last week.
so stop it, get some vacation, meet people, ... etc until you beat stress!
I run two businesses and both
Le 21/06/2011 16:16, Carlos Mennens a écrit :
I got a request today from someone on the software development team
that reads as follows:
According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an email server is
supposed to use port 587.
Server to server SMTP relays are to use port 25.
When I am
Le 20/06/2011 10:20, Tom Kinghorn a écrit :
Good morning all.
what would be the best way to block (or substitute) profanity in the
Subject body of mails.
better forget about this.
silly filters will have problems with
Charles Dickens
sussex
...
and good filters won't detect:
Vanessa Kmee
Le 18/06/2011 07:44, Jayanta Ghosh a écrit :
Dear List,
Our problem has been solved by doing the following :-
a. The package cyrus-sasl-ntlm-2.1.22-4 was installed in our server. As a
result
of which NTLM authentication was enabled in our server.
You can test this by executing telnet IP
Le 18/06/2011 07:47, Xavier Ambrosioni a écrit :
It surprising because currently I have no firewall enabled.
I guess you haven Orange LiveBox. if so, it is a (basic) firewall:
http://assistance.orange.fr/du-bon-usage-du-pare-feu-de-votre-livebox-1317.php
Anyway, since you only have
Le 18/06/2011 02:46, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:19:47 +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
on ipv4 i have my own reverse ptr, on ipv6 i currently have my ipv6
provider ptr, should i be lame and say home.junc.org on both ? :=)
$ host home.junc.org
home.junc.org has address
Le 16/06/2011 09:51, Ilya Pichugin a écrit :
[snip]
Jun 10 12:45:40 hostname postfix/smtp1763: A7E8F7068C7:
to=k...@recipient.com, relay=mail.recipient.com[220.220.220.220]:25,
delay=5.3, delays=2.4/0.47/0.6/1.8, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
mail.recipient.com[220.220.220.220] said:
Le 16/06/2011 18:34, Petre Bandac a écrit :
hello
in the last period I had several complains about mail originating from
yahoo/gmail not reaching the mailbox
logging in the logs I found entries like this:
###
Jun 16 10:07:12 mx postfix/smtpd[27072]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
Le 16/06/2011 22:33, Petre Bandac a écrit :
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:26:24 +0200 Anno Domini
the honourable mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote using one of his/her
keyboards:
Le 16/06/2011 18:34, Petre Bandac a écrit :
hello
in the last period I had several complains about mail originating
Le 16/06/2011 15:30, Jayanta Ghosh a écrit :
Hi,
We have a mail server running on RHEL 5.3. The list of components
installed on the server are given below:-
1. postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2
2. openldap-2.3.43-3.el5
3. cyrus-sasl-2.1.22-4
4. courier-authlib-0.61.0-1.rh5Server
5.
Le 14/06/2011 20:35, Ansgar Wiechers a écrit :
On 2011-06-14 Rich Wales wrote:
b) rdns for 95.53.111.119 gives
pppoe.95-53-111-119.dynamic.lenobl.avangarddsl.ru
This might be covered by Stan Hoeppner's PCRE for dynamic IP ranges:
http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre
Additionally, a
Le 14/06/2011 11:34, Harry Lachanas ( via Freemail ) a écrit :
Hi list,
Just by looking at the headers Return-Path, From: and To:
one can sense that the following is spam ...
---
Le 11/06/2011 16:42, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 00:28, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 6/10/2011 4:04 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good
Le 14/06/2011 04:21, Janantha Marasinghe a écrit :
Thanks Sahil
Basically What i want to check is when a mail is recieved from postfix
if it can reject the e-mail is the sending e-mail server is in the
blacklist rbl
smtpd_recipient_restrictions is about Mail To: right. So if I have an
Le 14/06/2011 23:21, Ansgar Wiechers a écrit :
On 2011-06-14 mouss wrote:
Le 14/06/2011 20:35, Ansgar Wiechers a écrit :
On 2011-06-14 Rich Wales wrote:
b) rdns for 95.53.111.119 gives
pppoe.95-53-111-119.dynamic.lenobl.avangarddsl.ru
This might be covered by Stan Hoeppner's PCRE
Le 08/06/2011 14:35, Бак Микаел a écrit :
Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Бак Микаел mikael@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi list,
Reading the archives I saw that there is a nice regexp with dynamic
hostnames available here: www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
Unfortunately this
Le 08/06/2011 15:21, jimbob palmer a écrit :
Hello,
Say I wanted to whitelist a specific email recipient always and
forever, but apply normal spam checks to everything else, could I do
that?
yes. my standard setup includes a
check_recipient_access
just after
Le 06/06/2011 14:44, gaby a écrit :
Hi
If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL password and
IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
No. the purpose of TLS is to encrypt traffic, including passwords.
that said, you need to configure your TLS/SSL servers to only accept
Le 06/06/2011 23:53, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:30:59PM +0200, mouss wrote:
If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL
password and IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
No. the purpose of TLS is to encrypt traffic, including passwords
Le 04/06/2011 04:06, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 06/04/2011 02:50 AM, Kendrick wrote:
I am trying to make it so that postfix takes specific actions when
spam from my domian externally arrives.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions / reject_unknown_... looked prommising
but I dont see how to work it
Le 04/06/2011 08:43, Goutam Baul a écrit :
Dear Frank,
Thanks a lot for responding. I am now reading through the net and trying to
implement things as suggested. Just a few queries:
1) As I am interested in sending bulk mails, I am contemplating modification
of my DNS zone file with SPF
Le 04/06/2011 13:25, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:14:42AM +0200, mouss wrote:
Le 04/06/2011 08:43, Goutam Baul a ecrit :
2) Can you indicate some reliable website to get the dkim-milter
package for my RHEL 3.8?
no idea.
PS. isn't 3.8 way too outdated?
RHEL, IIUC, has
Le 04/06/2011 07:09, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
1 - configure your DNS SPF record
personal opinion: I recommend against:
my experience with hotmail is as follows:
- I've added an spf record. cool it works
- i had to move the server to another IP. I updated the spf record.
doesn't work
Le 04/06/2011 16:25, Kendrick a écrit :
On 06/04/2011 05:06 AM, mouss wrote:
Using check_*_access before reject_unauth_destination is discouraged. it
may (accidentally) lead to open relay should someone add an entry that
returns OK.
better use:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
Le 02/06/2011 06:42, kshitij mali a écrit :
Hi all ,
we send the emails from the application server by making smtp session with
one of the postfix server
there’s a scenario when CRM server send out invalid email address to
postfix, we’re getting a bounced-back email saying that the email
Le 01/06/2011 10:52, Nahliel Steinberg a écrit :
Sirs,
Recently i have configured postfix on my laptop at home, to use it with
yahoo. Ok at home run succesfull.
Here at office, postfix dont run because 465 port is blocking by a firewall.
I decide at office, to reconfigure postfix with
Le 01/06/2011 12:13, Jerry a écrit :
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:52:17 +0200
Nahliel Steinberg nahliel.steinb...@gmail.com articulated:
Recently i have configured postfix on my laptop at home, to use it
with yahoo. Ok at home run succesfull.
Here at office, postfix dont run because 465 port is
Le 31/05/2011 01:00, an...@melted-ice.co.uk a écrit :
Hi,
I have a problem trying to work out a postfix solution.
I have 2 smtp servers:
Mail gateway VSgate1 for MX, Spam, Virus
Mail server Postfix1 for general mail processing and storage.
my aim is to achieve the following
1.
Le 30/05/2011 19:09, Nahliel Steinberg a écrit :
Tank's you Noel,
i change it
[127.0.0.1]:11125 username:password
and i do hash : postmap sasl_passwd
i restart postfix : /etc/init.d/postfix restart
an i try to send a mail
log say this, and i think that authentification is
Le 27/05/2011 09:40, Kurniawan Junaidy a écrit :
Hi folks,
I am not able to send email through my postfix server by using any
external ip, but ok from my internal ip. The file says about Relay
Access Denied 554 5.7.1. How to fix this?
it's already fixed! this prevents your server from
Le 28/05/2011 20:47, David Brown a écrit :
Hello Noel, yup, just in case someone sees this after Googling for a
similar issue: executing the rndc reload zone after updating the serial
number does wonders for your RBL (doh!).
note that rbldnsd may be a better choice should your list grow...
Le 27/05/2011 18:55, Gary Duncan a écrit :
Thanks but I'm not sure that quite answers my question.
We already use forward_path to look for a local .forward file, eg
forward_path = /mail/home/$user/.forward ...
but if that .forward calls for external command delivery, eg |
Le 28/05/2011 16:02, Evan Martin a écrit :
I'd like to keep statistics on the number and total size of messages
received for each virtual domain each day. Similar idea to quotas,
except I want to keep the stats even for virtual aliases (forwarded to
external addresses), not just mailboxes.
Le 26/05/2011 18:41, pch0317 a écrit :
Hi,
I want to forward mail only for one user u...@mydomain.tld to
u...@otherdomain.tld.
I try do it in this way:
/etc/postfix/virtual:
...
u...@mydomain.tld u...@mydomain.tld, u...@otherdomain.tld
...
When I send mail to u...@mydomain.tld
Le 26/05/2011 17:31, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
On 05/26/2011 03:34 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:22:55AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
/etc/postfix/transport:
u...@example.com error:5.1.1 your message
Le 23/05/2011 05:11, Troy Piggins a écrit :
* Mark Homoky wrote :
* Monday, May 23, 2011, 12:25:40 AM, you wrote:
I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics
usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by
the amount of spam/rejections achieved using just
Le 23/05/2011 04:50, Des Dougan a écrit :
Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that?
go step by step: add a domain in mysql, add users in mysql, ... then
tell postfix to use these (virtual_mailbox_domains,
virtual_mailbox_maps, ...) then test.
#cat main.cf
...
Le 23/05/2011 19:01, Des Dougan a écrit :
On May 2011, at 4:24 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:50:33 -0700
Des Dougan d...@douganconsulting.com articulated:
Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that?
Please don't top post.
You might want to start here:
Le 21/05/2011 20:19, Reindl Harald a écrit :
hi
is there any recommended way to implement SRS (Sender Rewrite Scheme) in
Postfix
to get rid of SPF warnings/blocks for via virtual_alias_maps forwarded
messages?
if you want to implement SRS, then you'll need to deliver to an external
Le 22/05/2011 23:33, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 22.05.2011 22:22, schrieb mouss:
Le 21/05/2011 20:19, Reindl Harald a écrit :
hi
is there any recommended way to implement SRS (Sender Rewrite Scheme) in
Postfix
to get rid of SPF warnings/blocks for via virtual_alias_maps forwarded
Le 16/05/2011 19:38, Thomas Berger a écrit :
Hi,
a short question about the parameter permit_naked_ip_address:
As a client may use his IP for the HELO command ( look at the recent RFC's ),
which recent RFC's?
RC 5321 (section 4.1.1.1) says:
cite
Syntax:
ehlo = EHLO SP (
Le 13/05/2011 03:11, jeffrey j donovan a écrit :
On May 12, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jason Voorhees:
I suggest the documentation, instead:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_proxy_filter
Thanks, I'm going to read it.
This can be anything that speaks SMTP.
Le 13/05/2011 10:24, Ralf Zimmermann a écrit :
On 05/13/2011 02:08 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jason Voorhees:
I suggest the documentation, instead:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_proxy_filter
Thanks, I'm going to read it.
This can be anything that speaks SMTP.
(Note that
Le 10/05/2011 15:39, Hubeli Daniel a écrit :
Hi all, I'm pretty new to postfix and I'm trying to configure a mail relay on
a internal network that should relay mails outside (Internet) based on
different rules.
As a first step I configure Postfix to allow some servers to send mail for
Le 10/05/2011 12:23, Voytek Eymont a écrit :
I have Postfix 2.3.3 on a Centos behind NAT on home ADSL, ISP blocks
outbound 25, this is just for occasional casual use, I set it up to ISP
SMTP with
'relayhost = [mail.bigpond.com]'
I also have a Postfix server on internet
what's the best
Le 06/05/2011 22:57, Jack a écrit :
Thank you Viktor, I wouldn't agree about the question because I may not
know the process as intricately as you do, but I can share symptoms and try
to figure out a direction through help.
Jack, we have no idea what problem you have or what you are talking
Le 28/04/2011 00:26, Jerry a écrit :
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:11:17 +0200
Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net articulated:
On 27/04/11 18:52, Jerry wrote:
I am in the process of setting up a mail system with plus
addressing. Presently it is using Dovecot with sieve to filter the
mail. What I
Le 28/04/2011 00:03, JR Swartz a écrit :
For several years my small business used one large apache web server
(virtual hosts)/email server combined with Postfix. Recently I split the
two into their own separate servers. I have a webserver.domain.com and
mailserver.domain.com.
I
Le 25/04/2011 04:07, ben thielsen a écrit :
given two lines in header_checks, both work when testing with postmap, but
only one works when processing actual mail. it's my sense that it's related
to the fact that the non working header check has to do with mail submitted
via sendmail(1),
Le 08/04/2011 13:52, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 08.04.2011 13:48, schrieb Gábor Lénárt:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 05:05:45PM +0530, kshitij mali wrote:
HI All
Postfix will try to deliver email based on A record suppose the mx record is
missing , so how to diable this .
I mean to say
Le 09/04/2011 08:44, Voytek Eymont a écrit :
I'm setting up a mail server on a virtual server
smtp banner is set to myhost.mydomain
reverse dns resolves to the data centre IP address
- smtpd banner matters for inbound mail (i.e. for receiving)
- reverse dns matters for outbound mail
Le 01/04/2011 01:25, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
mouss put forth on 3/31/2011 4:38 PM:
Le 31/03/2011 17:52, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Received: from mail-iw0-f176.google.com (biz88.inmotionhosting.com
[66.117.14.32])
by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F297D6C12E
for s
Le 01/04/2011 09:47, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
On 2011-03-31 21:16:16 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
HELO checks are the primary defense against backscatter of this sort; I use
a simple subset of the available options:
smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
Le 31/03/2011 17:52, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Received: from mail-iw0-f176.google.com (biz88.inmotionhosting.com
[66.117.14.32])
by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F297D6C12E
for s...@hardwarefreak.com; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:29:19 -0500
biz88.inmotionhosting.com
101 - 200 of 1792 matches
Mail list logo
