[pfx] forwarding setup for mailbox user

2023-04-07 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
Hello, for a mailbox user, such as my one t...@myposts.ovh, where to define the forwarding? for example, I want messages sent to this mailbox to be copied to gmail. Thanks. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe s

[pfx] confused about two options

2023-04-08 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
Hello, 1. use MIME encoding for 8bit chars 2. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Do they mean the same stuff? Should I use 8bit encoding, or 7bit? If I am composing the Chinese message. Thank you. Tom Reed ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-user

[pfx] Re: confused about two options

2023-04-08 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
If message has image included, or has UTF8 chars, is base64 encoding must be used? Thank you again. On 2023-04-08 19:58, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: tom--- via Postfix-users: Hello, 1. use MIME encoding for 8bit chars I suppose you mean that you encode message header or boody

[pfx] Re: confused about two options

2023-04-08 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
2. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The 2nd is more of a property assertion, than an encoding. The MIME-part content is transmitted as-is, but is asserted to consist entirely of 7-bit octets (i.e. still 8-bit octets, but in the range 0–127). Similarly, the "8bit" transfer encoding is also an

[pfx] Re: confused about two options

2023-04-08 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
And there is a discussion on stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25710599/content-transfer-encoding-7bit-or-8-bit regards. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@pos

[pfx] Question to reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org

2023-04-08 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
I have this setting in main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination, check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net When I sent message from a

[pfx] reject_unknown_helo_hostname and reject_unknown_client_hostname

2023-04-08 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
greetings, (1) reject_unknown_helo_hostname: Reject the request when the HELO or EHLO hostname has no DNS A or MX record. This seems reasonable. (2) reject_unknown_client_hostname: Reject the request when 1) the client IP address->name mapping fails, or 2) the name->address mapping fails, or

[pfx] Re: Question to reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org

2023-04-08 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-09 13:53, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 9/04/23 14:02, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: I have this setting in main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions =    permit_mynetworks,    permit_sasl_authenticated,    reject_unauth_destination,    check_policy_service unix:private

[pfx] Re: Question to reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org

2023-04-09 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-09 13:53, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 9/04/23 14:02, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: I have this setting in main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions =    permit_mynetworks,    permit_sasl_authenticated,    reject_unauth_destination,    check_policy_service unix:private

[pfx] Re: Question to reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org

2023-04-09 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-09 17:12, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: tom--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-09 04:02: I have this setting in main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination, check_policy_service

[pfx] Re: Question to reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org

2023-04-09 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-09 21:14, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: tom--- via Postfix-users: I have this setting in main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination, check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf

[pfx] DNS resolvers difference for RBL checks

2023-04-09 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
Hello I have two debian boxes, one is running unbound for dns resolver, another is running systemd-resolve. As you see the first, udp0 0 127.0.0.1:530.0.0.0:* 290152/unbound The second, udp0 0 127.0.0.53:53 0.0.0.0

[pfx] Re: Question to reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org

2023-04-09 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-09 10:02, t...@myposts.ovh wrote: I have this setting in main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination, check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_cli

[pfx] Re: DNS resolvers difference for RBL checks

2023-04-09 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-10 09:30, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 09:14:19AM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: I have two debian boxes, one is running unbound for dns resolver, Congratulations on a sound choice. another is running systemd-resolve. My comiserations

[pfx] Re: Question to reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org

2023-04-09 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-10 12:39, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 10/04/23 14:21, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: I have resolved the issue by: 1. install unbound as dns resolver locally This is good. 2. change this statement:    check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf,   to this one

[pfx] aliases for mailbox domain

2023-04-10 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
Hello Maybe I am not clear about virtual_mailbox_domains and virtual_alias_domains. Say I have this mailbox domain: myposts.ovh And a real user t...@myposts.ovh which exists in dovecot-users table. After then, can I create aliases in virtual_alias_maps like follows? al...@myposts.ovh t...@my

[pfx] Re: aliases for mailbox domain

2023-04-10 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-10 23:10, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 04:19:28PM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: And a real user t...@myposts.ovh which exists in dovecot-users table. After then, can I create aliases in virtual_alias_maps like follows? al

[pfx] HELO checks for desktop clients

2023-04-10 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
Hello If I added this config in main.cf: smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_invalid_helo_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, reject_unknown_helo_hostname many email MUA such as thunderbir

[pfx] Re: HELO checks for desktop clients

2023-04-10 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-11 07:37, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Did you set 'smtpd_delay_reject=no'? Wietse Wietse, I didn't set smtpd_delay_reject=no in my main.cf. regards ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To un

[pfx] any web.de staff here?

2023-04-15 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
Hello, one of web.de's sender IPs is listed into zen.spamhaus.org as the following info. 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.165.159.35] blocked using z en.spamhaus.org; https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL175032 $ dig -x 82.165.159.35 +short mout-xforward.web.de. Can anyone

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-15 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-16 09:33, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 09:15:24AM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: one of web.de's sender IPs is listed into zen.spamhaus.org as the following info. 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.165.159.35] blocked

[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.8.0

2023-04-17 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-18 03:25, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Postfix stable release 3.8.0 is available. Postfix 3.4..3.7 will be updated soon; after that, Postfix 3.4 will no longer be updated. The main changes are below. See the RELEASE_NOTES file for further details. * Support to look up DNS

[pfx] is localhost.localdomain a FQDN?

2023-04-17 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
I saw many peer MTA connecting me with this default HELO hostname: localhost.localdomain. is this a FQDN? is it valid? Thanks. Tom ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.o

[pfx] smtp code 450 and delivery to secondary MX

2023-04-17 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
When my main postfix rejected a message due to reject_unknown_client_hostname: Apr 18 10:27:12 mail postfix/smtpd[129429]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[194.33.39.17]: 450 4.7.25 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [194.33.39.17]; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= I found this m

[pfx] Re: smtp code 450 and delivery to secondary MX

2023-04-17 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
Note that reject_unknown_client_hostname is a very strict test that is likely to reject legit mail. Consider using reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname instead. Do you know where I can set the action code 550 for this directive? Thanks. ___

[pfx] Re: smtp code 450 and delivery to secondary MX

2023-04-17 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-18 12:49, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:35:22AM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: So my question is, smtp code 450 will cause the sender to retry delivery to secondary MX? Yes, if the client is a legitimate MTA, less common with a junk

[pfx] Reject mail by language

2023-04-18 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
How to reject messages by languages? For example, only English, Germany and Chinese messages will be accepted. All others should be rejected. Thanks. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-u

[pfx] Re: Reject mail by language

2023-04-18 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-19 10:32, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 02:54:22AM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: How to reject messages by languages? For example, only English, Germany and Chinese messages will be accepted. All others should be rejected. Email

[pfx] Questions for the third party plugins

2023-04-20 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
greetings, do policyd-service (such as rate-limit) and milter (such as opendkim) use the same communication way to postfix? any difference between them? Thanks. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email