On 2020/05/23 08:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 02:02:52PM +0200, Thomas wrote:
ich sende ab und an etwas an Ämter vorab. Die kommen mittlerweile sogar
mit pdf zurecht!
Leider sprechen wir hier (postfix-users) nur Englisch. Deutsch have ich
nicht so gut in der Schule
But it helps to know what bait is before you buy a fishing boat.
~v
On 2020/10/14 10:00 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jason Long:
It is so odd that some people here don't like to answer to the
users questions and forwarding them to read a book with 496 pages.
Indeed, postfix-users is not a
On 2020/05/26 14:06 PM, Bill Gee wrote:
Almost completely irrelevant, but still an interesting (and true!) story ... About 30
years ago I started a job at an insurance company. At that time less than half the
company had PCs. Most had 3270 green screen terminals. The corporate email was SYSM
Is there any way to change the order of delivery of items in the mail queue?
Is there any way of changing priority of mail when adding to the queue?
Searched the docs and found nqmgr but not this specific question.
Thank you.
On 2020/06/15 19:01 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:50:16PM -0400, vi...@vheuser.com wrote:
Is there any way to change the order of delivery of items in the mail queue?
Not as such, but see below.
Is there any way of changing priority of mail when adding to the queue
On 2020/06/16 11:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Jun 16, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
- Adding layer of sender-based round-robin selection. Not sure if
that would explode at large scale.
When the input mix approximates steady-state, FIFO is essentially optimal,
with each type of
On 2020/06/16 10:39 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:25:31PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Postfix has only one queue, and concurrency and process count is
per-destination, not based on where the mail came from.
Consider using a separate postfix instance for
On 2020/06/16 13:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
vi...@vheuser.com:
Obviously I am above my pay grade here,
but can this? "Adding some artificial 'cost' value" currently be done?
No. There is an existing solution that works for multi-recipient
list mail. That solution does not work
Why not take it off this list and contact the developers?
Users can't make small changes.
Enough already.
On 2020/06/07 12:59 PM, Pau Amma wrote:
On 2020-06-07 18:44, Norton Allen wrote:
[undeserved snippage]
Someone has suggested that we make a small change, a change that Black
people
On 2020/06/07 14:13 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Jun 7, 2020, at 2:03 PM, vi...@vheuser.com wrote:
Why not take it off this list and contact the developers?
Users can't make small changes.
Enough already.
The intersection of “this is meaningless politics, stop being such a carelord
On 2020/06/08 09:31 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/8/2020 9:06 AM, John Dale wrote:
Why does this agitate people? Because if the time spend on this
change had been used to fix an actual deficiency, people of color who
use the software would have been served with value, not just platitudes.
Something's amiss...
First time in 10 years I've gotten this:
"An error occurred while processing your request.
Reference #30.24721cb8.1612134453.1a374d81"
from here: https://www.spamcop.net/
Something has changed.
On 2021/01/31 11:13 AM, Gerald Galster wrote:
Good news, the
On 2021/01/26 19:49 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0500, vi...@vheuser.com wrote:
posttls-finger -c -lmay "[example.com]"
returns "posttls-finger: Server is anonymous"
What should the server return?
How it his configured?
You can tr
posttls-finger -c -lmay "[example.com]"
returns "posttls-finger: Server is anonymous"
What should the server return?
How it his configured?
14 matches
Mail list logo
