-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Robert Schetterer
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:04 AM
To: postfix users list
Subject: OT aol.com no mx record ???
Hi , sorry off topic
i see disapearing mx record from
Dear List,
Running Postfix 2.8-20101217, with amavisd-new, clamav, spamassassin
I'm trying to change the default error messages:
host mx.server.com[1.0.0.0] said: 550 5.1.1
b...@email.com: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local
recipient table (in reply to RCPT
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 2:15 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Using unverified_recipient_reject_reason
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
Dear List,
Using Postfix 2.4.6.
Finally resolved a problem that has been laying around for a while, just want
to verify if this is the correct solution...
We have a canonical.regexp:
/us...@.*\.subdomain\.com/ u...@domain.com
main.cf:
canonical_maps =
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 1:16 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: fatal: socket: Too many open files
Using
% ulimit -n 8192
% postfix start
Hi List,
For one of our companies, we want to use a dedicated ip address for all their
outgoing mails.
So mail from @companyx.com goes out via 1.1.1.1
When looking for ways to do this I found the
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps.
Would that be the right way to go?
Thanks for any
Hi List,
Is there a command line trick to test pipelining?
We found some very old mail servers (non postfix btw) which don't seem
to properly support pipelining, although they EHLO greet with the
PIPELINING extention
I haven't been able to find a way to enforce actual pipelining via
Hi All,
Not really Postfix related, but maybe you can share your thoughts...
Received a mail today from a user that sent a e-mail which immediately
bounced..
The bounce message said:
host bla.bla.bla[xxx.xxx.xxx] said: 550-SPF check SOFT fail. Your are not
allowed to send mail from 550
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Administrator
Beckspaced.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:52 PM
To: Robert Schetterer
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: email account bombarded with SPAM error bounces - what to
do?
hello
, 9. July 2010), Kammen van, Marco,
Springer
SBM NL wrote:
But there is a big spam/virus attack going on, where messages look
like NDR's but they aren't.
Various big anti spam vendors are having serious issues stopping
this.
Could you provide a URL where more details are available?
Regards
Hi All,
Not something specific for this list maybe, but was just wondering if
anyone else noticed a DNS error with all .de domains...
Suddenly got a ... load of NDR's and user complaints.
(Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=mwoffice.de
type=A: Host not found)
Hi All,
Searched on the web for this but couldn't find anything close to what
I'm looking for.
Any of you know tool that generates web based (graph) statistics based
on information in the postfix logfile.
I'm looking for things like amount of messages sent/received daily
weekly monthly etc
Patric Falinder
Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL skrev 2010-04-14 10:50:
Hi All,
Searched on the web for this but couldn't find anything close to what
I'm looking for.
Any of you know tool that generates web based (graph) statistics based
on information in the postfix logfile
http://jimsun.linxnet.com/postfix_contrib.html
This will do just fine!
Thanks all for the suggestions.
Dear All,
Yesterday i noticed that one of our smarthosts wasn't delivering mail anymore.
Soon saw that both Domain Controllers that are being used for ldap lookups
where down.
Changed the ldap lookups to new domain controllers, immediatly afterwords the
postmaster mailbox started to fill with
Hi All,
Because of a crashed exchange server we need to queue messages longer on
our smarthost then usual.
I want to increase the time messages are queued to at least 2 weeks...
Is changing the 'maximal_queue_lifetime' in main.cf sufficient to
accomplish this?
Thanks!
-
Marco van
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Martijn de Munnik
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:54 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Test e-mailservice
Does anybody have such a test setup?
Thanks,
Martijn
I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better
name than swatter or halligan let me know. Once the name changes,
all the configuration parameters will change, too.
prefix? It fixes things before they become a problem...
p...@rick
So simple yet so good!
I like it
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:07 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: fatal: garbage after ] in server description:
Are you perhaps using a mis-configured using
Hi All,
After adding a couple of hundred lines to transport.misc, these errors
are popping up in the mail.log:
Jul 14 04:09:14 servername postfix/smtp[22020]: fatal: garbage after ]
in server description:
[SEGBLOGR0008.springer-sbm.com],relay:[SEGBLOGR0008.springer
-sbm.com]
It's a
* Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL marco.vankam...@springer.com:
Hi All,
After adding a couple of hundred lines to transport.misc, these errors
are popping up in the mail.log:
Jul 14 04:09:14 servername postfix/smtp[22020]: fatal: garbage after ]
in server description
Hi All,
The last couple of days I'm seeing more and more of these errors:
Jul 7 12:23:04 servername postfix/master[4219]: warning: process
/usr/local/postfix/libexec/smtp pid 13490 exit status 1
Jul 7 12:23:04 servername postfix/qmgr[32036]: warning: private/relay
socket: malformed
Hi All,
One of our users is requesting a batch of e-mail aliases ranging from:
j10...@domain.com to j10...@domain.com
I made the following regexp which kind of does the trick:
/j10[0-3][0-9][0-...@domain\.com/ thisaddr...@domain.com
But this adds the range of j10300 to j10399
One of our users is requesting a batch of e-mail aliases ranging
from:
j10...@domain.com to j10...@domain.com
I made the following regexp which kind of does the trick:
/j10[0-3][0-9][0-...@domain\.com/ thisaddr...@domain.com
But this adds the range of j10300 to j10399 which isn't wanted.
Hi All,
We recently took over a company that used SPF.
Because our e-mail infra is way more complicated than theirs and we have
tons of external parties who send mails using our domains, we decided
long ago not to use SPF.
Now they say that %5 of their mailings don't arrive at customers
Dear All,
As of lately we are getting more and more ldap lookup timeouts during
the day
Nov 3 12:44:59 servername postfix/proxymap[31451]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup: Search error -5: Timed out
Nov 3 12:45:09 servername postfix/proxymap[28685]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup: Search error -5:
26 matches
Mail list logo