Re: 2.10 problem

2013-06-04 Thread Lima Union
not much required, 'man 6 figlet' On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Jerry postfix-u...@seibercom.net wrote: On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:08:17 + Viktor Dukhovni articulated: On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:45:41PM -0700, Grant wrote: I know this is incredibly vague, but can anyone hazard a

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-27 Thread Lima Union
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Lima Union: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] Am 26.03.2013 19:36, schrieb Lima Union: Wietse, ok, I'll disable the fqrdns check for now and check the chroot configuration after I return from

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-26 Thread Lima Union
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 3/25/2013 7:55 AM, Lima Union wrote: On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote: Ejaz skrev den 2013-03-23 11:49: ... are you missing http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre ? :) very

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-26 Thread Lima Union
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote: On 3/26/2013 7:04 AM, Lima Union wrote: ... ok, it seems that for some reason the check is not being triggered (#847) after a postfix reload and 24 hours of operation in a busy server, any ideas? So when you grep

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-26 Thread Lima Union
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote: Lima Union skrev den 2013-03-26 13:04: 853 #reject_unverified_recipient, postconf -n not just content listning from main.cf your error might just be that you have # at random lines ok, here it's (hostname/ip

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-26 Thread Lima Union
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote: Lima Union skrev den 2013-03-26 18:59: what can I check? dig +trace ipv4.google.com are the trace with hostnames all places ? if you are on ipv6 change ipv4 to ipv6 are you using forwarders that does not support dnssec

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-26 Thread Lima Union
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Lima Union: working. This MTA is behing a firewall, in a DMZ with a bidirectional mapping (1:1). I issued a grep ': connect from' and everything shown is 'connect from unknown[ip.add.re.ss]'. I'm using pdnsd for caching

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-26 Thread Lima Union
Am 26.03.2013 19:36, schrieb Lima Union: Wietse, ok, I'll disable the fqrdns check for now and check the chroot configuration after I return from holidays this is ONE char in the master.cf and if i where you i would not make holidays as long a production server is known misconfigured ok

Re: dictionary-attack

2013-03-25 Thread Lima Union
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote: Ejaz skrev den 2013-03-23 11:49: How do I configure my postfix not to accept the emails which sent on invalid address?, since morning we have been noticed that there huge spam dictionary attack on our server, all originated

Re: warning: network_biopair_interop: error writing 37 bytes to the network: Broken pipe

2013-03-07 Thread Lima Union
Maybe this helps (just googled it...) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/273461 Regards. On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Rishi rishigang...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I've been receiving lots of errors in mail.log Mar 7 11:49:47 mail postfix/smtpd[92520]: warning:

Latest package for RHEL6

2012-10-22 Thread Lima Union
Hi all! does anyone know where I can find the latest postfix release (2.9.x) for RHEL 6 x86_64 from some 'trusted' source? unfortunately Simon Mudd didn't post any package for this platform yet. Thanks in advance. LU

Re: Latest package for RHEL6

2012-10-22 Thread Lima Union
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Morten Stevens mstev...@imt-systems.com wrote: On 22.10.2012 16:40, Lima Union wrote: Hi all! does anyone know where I can find the latest postfix release (2.9.x) for RHEL 6 x86_64 from some 'trusted' source? unfortunately Simon Mudd didn't post any package

Re: [OT] Hotmail change the mail policy yesterday????'

2012-05-31 Thread Lima Union
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:37 PM, kazabe kaz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. From yesterday many servers to i admin has been banned to send messages to hotmail.  The error is related to said: 550 SC-001 Do you are experimenting the same issue today? Thanks and regards. Hi, you're not alone, we're

Re: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)

2011-12-05 Thread Lima Union
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org To: postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration) To get some idea of Yahoo spam load

Re: Easy Administration of Postfix SMTP Relay Server

2011-09-23 Thread Lima Union
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Kaleb Hosie kho...@nicanada.com wrote: I’m currently tasked with a project of creating a spam server which will receive email for all of our customers, filter it for spam and relay clean mail onto the final destination. The challenge is that it needs to be

[SOT] Low volume antispam filter broken URL link

2011-08-31 Thread Lima Union
Hi all! Unfourtunately the link posted in http://www.postfix.org/addon.html for 'crm114 Postfix howto by Eugene Borukhovich' is broken (google didnt't help either), does anyone by chance have that document? I'm trying to setup a low volume/resources antispam system (any other recommendation is

Re: Large ISP which use Postfix

2011-07-15 Thread Lima Union
2011/7/14 Peter Tselios s91...@yahoo.gr: Hallo,     I need to prepare a presentation for my company because we plan to deploy a new mail system. I need to know the names of some medium to large ISPs that uses Postfix as their SMTP server. Do you know where I can find that information? Thanks

Filtering spam with a partial pattern

2011-05-18 Thread Lima Union
Hi all! i'm seeing a huge quantity of spam during this week (~156K messages) all from an smtp addresses that begins with '0-', like: from=0...@cancer.org from=0-1z3ize-...@bxbmail.de from=0...@carnival.com from=0-gentil...@aditi.com from=0-happy-1...@msf.biglobe.ne.jp

Re: Filtering spam with a partial pattern

2011-05-18 Thread Lima Union
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Steve stev...@gmx.net wrote: Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 18 May 2011 08:49:25 -0500 Von: Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org An: postfix-users@postfix.org Betreff: Re: Filtering spam with a partial pattern On 5/18/2011 8:06 AM, Lima

Re: Filtering spam with a partial pattern

2011-05-18 Thread Lima Union
with a partial pattern On 5/18/2011 8:06 AM, Lima Union wrote: Hi all! i'm seeing a huge quantity of spam during this week (~156K messages) all from an smtp addresses that begins with '0-', like: from=0...@cancer.org from=0-1z3ize-...@bxbmail.de from=0...@carnival.com from=0-gentil...@aditi.com

Re: Filtering spam with a partial pattern

2011-05-18 Thread Lima Union
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 5/18/2011 1:30 PM, Lima Union wrote: One last question regarding this, due that the amount of spam is huge I'd like to catch some of these messages, how should I configure Postfix in order to let this kind

[SOT]: Postfix/syslog date format

2011-04-14 Thread Lima Union
Hi, I believe that this question is slightly OT but I'm seeing this syslog format in Postfix: Apr 10 08:53:12 relay1 postfix/cleanup[16550]:., my question is if there's a way to have also printed the year in the date field? while looking for historic data it can be really useful. I'm running

Re: [SOT]: Postfix/syslog date format

2011-04-14 Thread Lima Union
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:45 PM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 01:19:03PM -0300, Lima Union wrote: Hi, I believe that this question is slightly OT but I'm seeing this syslog format in Postfix: Apr 10 08:53:12 relay1 postfix/cleanup[16550]:., my question

Re: minor typo in Postfix's change log

2011-03-29 Thread Lima Union
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote: On 03/28/2011 02:59 PM, Lima Union wrote: [1] postfix/verify[3209]: close database /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db: No such file or directory Are you USING sender or recipient verification ? If so, does the verify

minor typo in Postfix's change log

2011-03-28 Thread Lima Union
Hi, while looking in the change log for some info about an issue I'm having[1] I found a simple typo in the date specified as shown here: 20200102 Workaround: don't report bogus Berkeley DB close errors as fatal errors. All operations before close are already error

Re: couple of doubts about postfix milters

2010-11-09 Thread Lima Union
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 11/9/2010 6:18 AM, Lima Union wrote: hi all! as the subject says I have two noob questions: (1) if I configure something like 'smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:10025 inet:localhost:10034' does Postfix respect

couple of doubts about postfix milters

2010-11-09 Thread Lima Union
hi all! as the subject says I have two noob questions: (1) if I configure something like 'smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:10025 inet:localhost:10034' does Postfix respect the order? I mean, will it processs the mail in order, first milter then second milter or what? for example, in this case 10025

Re: couple of doubts about postfix milters

2010-11-09 Thread Lima Union
Last doubt, as far as I understand from the documentation, the milter processing happends in smtpd(8) before the 'smtpd_recipient_restrictions' (cleanup(8)) check. Thus if I keep my current configuration for my new setup, using smtpd_milters and postgrey (under 'smtpd_recipient_restrictions')