Re: Problem with postfix-dnswl-permit (Was Re: REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: postfix-dnswl-permit 222.255.237.6/32 permit_auth_destination low vinabook.com DNSWLId 17147 > AFAIK, ACCEPT/PERMIT actions don't allow optional text. I believe > eliminating the verbose data would be preferable, yes. OK, fixed: | j...@main:~/bin> grep "222.255.237.6" /opt/rsync/dnswl/postfix-dnswl-permit | 222.255.237.6/32permit_auth_destination -- Matthias
Re: Problem with postfix-dnswl-permit (Was Re: REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster)
Hi all, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:15 AM, mouss wrote: >> postfix-dnswl-header >> 222.255.237.6/32 PREPEND X-REPLACEME: low vinabook.com DNSWLId 17147 >> >> postfix-dnswl-permit >> 222.255.237.6/32 permit_auth_destination low vinabook.com DNSWLId 17147 > no, it was that way since a long time. and sigh, I noticed that a long long > time ago but I focused on the header part... Yes, this hasn't changed since... ages. Would it be OK to simple leave out the verbose data after permit_auth_destination from a Postfix point of view? -- Matthias PS: Thanks for pinging, I normally don't follow postfix-users very closely.
Re: DNS Whitelisting
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > dnswl1.example.com=127.0.0.2*weight1, dnswl2.example.com=127.0.0.1*weight2 > dnsbl3.example.com=127.0.0.3*weight3, dnsbl4.example.com=127.0.0.1*weight4 What about wildcarding? dnswl.org currently returns 127.0.n.[0-3], with "n" being numerical for the category (eg banks etc). People may want to have something like "whitelist on 127.0.*.2 and 127.0.*.3". // Yes, the use and ordering of the octets was possibly not the best design choice back when. -- Matthias
