Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote
> Michael Grimm via Postfix-users:
>> Very recently I re-enabled IPv6 on my servers, and removed my
>> 'inet_protocols=ipv4' from main.cf and did *not* add 'inet_protocols=all'
>> because I checked for the default setting:
>>
Hi,
I am running postfix 3.8.4 on FreeBSD 14.0-STABLE and recompile postfix (and
all my other ports) on a regular basis (by poudriere).
Very recently I re-enabled IPv6 on my servers, and removed my
'inet_protocols=ipv4' from main.cf and did *not* add 'inet_protocols=all'
because I checked
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 07:36:37PM +0100, Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>> But will that work, once a mail has been deferred and is sitting in the
>> queue already?
>> Meaning, if a 'postqueue -f' will
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 04:02:48PM +0100, Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>> Sometimes outgoing mail is deferred due to "reputational issues" at
>> the receiving side. These "reputational issues" mostly
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Michael Grimm via Postfix-users:
>>> Postfix has a "rule based language" for receiving mail, but there
>>> is no such thing for outbound deliveries.
>>
>> I am only curious of how much functionality would be
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Michael Grimm via Postfix-users:
>> Sometimes outgoing mail is deferred due to "reputational issues"
>> at the receiving side. These "reputational issues" mostly concerned
>> my IP6 addresses, thus I removed IP6
[FreeBSD 14-STABLE, postfix 3.8.4, dovecot 2.3.21, rspamd 3.7.5]
Hi
Sometimes outgoing mail is deferred due to "reputational issues" at the
receiving side. These "reputational issues" mostly concerned my IP6 addresses,
thus I removed IP6 mailing completely. But now, I do want to give it a try,
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
> "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release.
[…]
> That was a long time ago. Postfix has evolved as the Internet has
> changed. I am continuing the overhaul of this software,
Sebastian Wiesinger via Postfix-users wrote
> Thanks Peter but I will never ever, as long as I live, use anything
> connected to UCEProtect.
+1
Regards,
Michael
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Kolusion K via Postfix-users wrote:
> So I have a bizarre problem. I can't send e-mail to some servers but I can to
> others. The e-mail that doesn't get sent is due to the connection timing out
> to the remote server.
>
> Another strange problem is that some people can e-mail me while others
Kolusion K via Postfix-users wrote:
> When I open a raw socket to the remote server on port 25 using telnet, I am
> able to connect and see the server announce itself […]
Then, do continue to provide all essential *FURTHER* commands via telnet and
see and report what happens.
Michael
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users wrote:
> * Michael Grimm via Postfix-users :
>> toganm--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is listed
>>> in any rbl sites.
>>
>> If you real
toganm--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is listed
> in any rbl sites.
If you really were in mailing business for some time you would know how RBLs
work: They react, they do not read crystal balls!
Regards,
Michael
13 matches
Mail list logo
