08.02.2023 12:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
..
/etc/postfix/sender-access:
top REJECT I employ crude anti-spam measures
.topREJECT I employ crude anti-spam measures
I wonder how effective to block just the TLDs. I guess it is zero, no?
I *guess* foo@top shouldn't
Hello Victor!
Just by a chance I noticed this email and wanted to add a comment.
04.10.2022 02:52, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
..
Perhaps you previously had a "backports" package that uses a non-default
release label, and it persisted across the upgrade... You may need to
also look at the configs
Hello Postfix-users!
And hello everyone who may still remember me.
Wietse, Victor, maybe Ralf is still here too..
With very warm regards and memory I'm here again.
LTNS, Very Long!.. :)
It's been long time since I touched email as well, besides
maintaining small postfix instances on servers to
30.04.2015 14:21, Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:12:33 +0300
Алексей Доморадов alex_...@mail.ru wrote:
But it's very uncomfortable to create maildir for each
user manually. Are there any workaround?
Postfix do create missing Maildirs by default,
there's no need to do extra
10.06.2014 05:02, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 6/9/2014 7:12 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I really should have figured this out ages ago, but...
Quite simply, there exits a small number of organizations that
run afoul of my various smtpd_recipient_restrictions and/or my
smtpd_helo_restrictions,
10.06.2014 22:43, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 6/10/2014 1:24 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
it all to one stage it becomes clumsier. Also, moving stuff which should
be run at connect or hello time to recipient time is kinda wrong.
Postfix performs delayed evaluation of restrictions by default so
21 марта 2014 г. 5:22:24 GMT+04:00, bperrotta billperro...@yahoo.com wrote
I found the answer to my problem.
Postfix wont mount if you have a bad fstab entry
in Suse Linux 12.3. Figured it out from a post
Wow. Postfix does not mount anything at all, and does not read fstab. However,
if some
03.02.2014 17:37, m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
[]
Please excuse me for this - sent 3 times.
It was my first attempt to use my android client for sending mail,
it had an issue submitting it to our (postfix) serveer and queued
mail, but i weren't able to find where the queue is..
/mjt
03.08.2013 21:00, LuKreme wrote:
In case this is useful to anyone else:
=== What I was going to post ===
After updating postfix to 2.10, mailman (which has datestamps on the binaries
of Apr 2010) is failing. The log message in maillog is:
Aug 3 10:38:33 mail Mailman mail-wrapper: Group
On 16.08.2012 16:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
[]
* With KVM and QEMU, one would set cache=none to bypass the write
cache in the physical host and make fsync() work as expected in
a virtual machine.
FWIW, with QEMU (kvm is just an accelerator for qemu, the
device model/emulation is exactly the
On 06.07.2012 17:14, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:56:34PM +0200, Markus Petri wrote:
I wrote a small milter to archive incoming emails.
Use recipient_bcc_maps to archive emails.
Or always_bcc parameter.
/mjt
On 03.05.2012 17:16, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[]
To who at Debian? Lamont Jones? Has he replied to your idiotic idea yet?
Please refrain from using such words in public forum.
Such usage makes you to be of that kind.
Thank you for making my worst nightmares come true. I will do
my best to
02.05.2012 00:14, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Tokarev:
[using unix instead of fifo]
And yes, I verified the socket code (instead of pipe code) on linux
a few days ago and it appears to work fine there too. So indeed, this
is a very good possibility too, but it does not cover solaris well
Hello.
I already mentioned this topic several years ago, and
described a technique I used to compensate the problem
at this time (and it is still usable and in use today).
The problem is that on typical workstation or any other
non-mail-heavy-load machine, postfix in its default
configuration
On 01.05.2012 17:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Tokarev:
The trick I use with postfix for a long time locally
to address this issue is to mount a tmpfs on linux on
/var/spool/postfix/run, create subdirs (pid, public,
private) there [...]
So, the question is: can postfix change the paths
These warnings started showing up after an upgrade
of our servers to version 2.9+.
We've several smtpd instances in master.cf, each
with its own set of restrictions. In order to
simplify managing of these, we split the them into
a set of separate restrictions, using this technique:
master.cf:
On 26.04.2012 14:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Tokarev:
master.cf:
extaddr:smtp ... smtpd -o smtpd_role=ext
master.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = smtpd_${smtpd_role}_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_ext_recipient_restrictions = ...
postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/master.cf
On 29.03.2012 22:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
[]
Perhaps you can suggest a way for makedefs to parse out the CPU
type from uname -whatever and use that in the library search?
This isn't about uname. Uname may return one thing, yet postfix
may be building for entirely another -- that's the main
On 29.03.2012 23:10, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:56 PM +0400 Michael Tokarev
m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Besides, gcc --print-search-dirs (as already used in makedefs)
includes all necessary multiarch directories already. So
I'm not really sure why the OP have
On 29.03.2012 23:23, John Peach wrote:
My Ubuntu Precise box has the following in in /etc/ld.so.conf which
will pick up those directories:
You can install libraries for other architectures - sparc, mipsel,
etc - and the corresponding dirs will be added to the list. Yes
even if you're on x86,
On 29.03.2012 23:32, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Tokarev:
SEARCHDIRS=$(${CC-gcc} -print-search-dirs 2/dev/null |
sed -n '/^libraries: =/s/libraries: =//p' |
sed -e 's/:/\n/g' | xargs -n1 readlink -f
On 29.03.2012 23:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Tokarev:
On 29.03.2012 22:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
[]
Perhaps you can suggest a way for makedefs to parse out the CPU
type from uname -whatever and use that in the library search?
This isn't about uname. Uname may return one thing, yet
On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
Hi!
I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours I've been
getting: host ... refused to talk to me: 421 service not available
(connection refused, too many connections) for all
On 04.03.2012 19:24, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
On 2012-03-04 11:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 04.03.2012 13:30, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
On 2012-03-04 09:20, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
Hi!
I am running a small Postfix server, and for a couple of hours I've been
getting: host ... refused
On 02.03.2012 16:25, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
On 03/02/2012 01:56 PM, Jerry wrote:
There is ... no custom Postfix schema
Hi,
maybe it is worth to make one to stop question cycle where I can get
postfix.schema for LDAP?.
It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
best
On 02.03.2012 16:47, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:31 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
It is the other way around: Postfix can use whatever scheme is
best for your needs, it does not dictate which schema to use.
Different usage scenarious will require different schemas.
99 cases out
On 10.02.2012 18:21, Simone Sanna wrote:
Hi list,
I am struggling to find a solution for a problem I have when relaying
mails from Postfix to Exchange server 2010.
The problem is that although messages are correctly sent, they do not
show up in the Sent Items folder of Exchange, I have tried
On 20.01.2012 16:01, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 1/20/2012 1:50 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Please excuse me for the somewhat harsh words, but except of the
alignment issues which should be solved for once when partitioning
and creating filesystem, the rest is a complete bullshit collected
from
On 20.01.2012 04:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[]
But that
alone isn't going to fix a 10x performance deficit. You've probably got
multiple factors degrading performance.
Yes, you have right. But I found recently, that disk mounted on my
server are slow 5.9K. My tests on in shows that they do
08.05.2011 22:33, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
/etc/postfix/dynamicmaps.cf as provided by Ubuntu/Debian is:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 318 2011-04-22 15:04 /etc/postfix/dynamicmaps.cf
by default. Which programs are using it and when? Before dropping
privileges? After? Does /usr/sbin/sendmail use
28.04.2011 18:22, Wietse Venema пишет:
Michael Tokarev:
28.04.2011 15:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Tokarev:
postfix/cleanup: warning: milter8_message: vstream_fseek
incoming/4BE085028D: File too large
Why is this reported as a 450 4.3.0 error? This should
be a permanent error instead
Hello.
I come across a situation when an almost-hitting-limit
message has been retried and retried multiple times
and was finally returned to the sender.
The receiving side uses a milter (antivirus application).
Here's how it looks like on the sending side:
postfix/qmgr: E7749E064:
28.04.2011 15:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Tokarev:
postfix/cleanup: warning: milter8_message: vstream_fseek
incoming/4BE085028D: File too large
Why is this reported as a 450 4.3.0 error? This should
be a permanent error instead.
No it shouldn't. Ok, _this_ very condition - EFBIG
27.04.2011 15:44, Noel Jones wrote:
[]
regexp and pcre compatible expression:
/^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{60}/ REJECT no spaces
matches Subject: followed by one or more spaces, followed by 60 or more
non-space characters.
This will reject mime-encoded quoted-printable subjects.
/mjt
26.04.2011 13:28, Peter L. Hansen wrote:
Hi List,
Iam having trouble trying to adding autoreply/autoresponder/outofoffice
functionality to our setup.
It seems that the best option is to use yaa. Other suggestions are
welcome.
I have a postfix setup with virtual users in mysql, and
It started as an operator error, albiet an unexpected one.
I had 3 IP addresses for our mailserver, one primary
which receives mail from outside, one internal, and
I added another, to which I pointed secondary MX to, in
order to test postscreen.
So it worked quite well for some time, and I
On 03.03.2011 18:11, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 03/03/2011 03:47 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
Here a example on my homeserver with set quota down to 10 MB
while 50 MB are in the inbox for this test-case. You see
the same message-id so i sent one message to two rcpt while
one of them was over quota
07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote:
[]
yes I know but I'm not in charge of realyhost and they (who are in charge)
told
me that they don't accept empty From. Could I somehow change From to some
kind
of black hole which will discard all the mails?
Postfix tries hard to conform to
I never actually used LDAP, and someone asked if it's possible
to alias one domain to another, and I wonder if its doable in
LDAP the Right Way.
Let's assume we've example.com domain with all the addresses
stored in LDAP somehow. Now let's assume also that example.net
should be an alias for
15.11.2010 14:08, Ignacio García wrote:
Hi there...
I'm having a problem with one of our servers. We have been blocked by
CBL because one of our customers have been sending many emails recently
from his php-based bulletin system. This system does not send lots of
emails (it's programmed to
15.11.2010 14:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
Catalin Iacob:
Hello everybody,
I use pipe to start my own script when an email to a certain address
is received. The script will do it's own logging and I want to be able
to correlate that logging with the Postifx logs. The queue id that is
used in
12.11.2010 12:33, Lists wrote:
[]
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
warn_if_reject reject_invalid_hostname
check_helo_access regexp:/etc/postfix/helo.regexp
Thanks Ralph, that makes sense. I copied the original line from this
list many years ago - just noticed in postconf (5) that
18.10.2010 16:43, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
[]
if ! grep @ STOP /dev/null
$1
STOP
then
Now that's interesting construct ;)
case $1 in
?...@?*) ;;
*) echo No @ in Mail-address 2; exit 1;;
esac
/mjt
15.06.2010 21:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Wietse Venemawie...@porcupine.org:
More thoroughly, when I search for all IP addresses that show up
in postscreen DNSBL rank XXX records:
% egrep `awk '/DNSBL rank/ { print $NF }' /var/log/maillog | sort -u`
/var/log/maillog | grep smtpd
If I try
06.06.2010 01:31, John Peach wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:26:46 +0200
Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
The unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code response defaults to 550.
If it is not 550 on your system, somebody altered it from the default.
(I don't see how an undeliverable address could
30.05.2010 15:58, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/30/2010 01:29 PM, Jarrod Neven wrote:
[]
#postconf -n
config_directory = /etc/postfix
mail_owner = postfix
setgid_group = postdrop
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_senders
check_sender_access does not
30.05.2010 21:37, Michael Tokarev wrote:
30.05.2010 15:58, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
[]
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_senders
check_sender_access does not work here; remove it.
It does, with smtpd_delay_reject = yes
Typo: it does
Harakiri wrote:
I can use
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions=check_policy_service unix:private/policy
just fine in the main.cf. However this has the drawback that i need to
add
-o smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions=
to each filter in the master.cf which should not use the policy service
A few years ago I implemented a new dict for
Postfix, dict_fnmatch. It is a shell-style
pattern matcher with patterns placed _inline_,
right in the config file, without any additional
files like pcre/regex (the simplest dictionaries
which does not use indexed files) and others.
The usage is
Jay G. Scott wrote:
Greetings,
the aliases files are limited to 1024 chars/record because of NIS.
Which part of the postfix documentation states this?
/mjt
Eugene V. Boontseff wrote:
Dear colleagues,
kindly looking for your assistence in the following matter.
To cut off the spamers, I intended to use pcre:table.
main.cf :
cut on
...
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/exper,
...
cut off
eug...@mail
Daniel Caillibaud wrote:
I have a pb with some mails (with unknown domains) injected into postfix
locally by fetchmail.
postfix reject smtp transaction when sender domain name is not found, which is
wanted exepted when it's a fetched mail.
I don't want fetchmail send directly to delivery
Alexander Hoogerhuis wrote:
I've just sent a long time looking at a problem a user alterted me to.
There was an issue receiving emails from a sepcific sender, and it was
clear that is was somehow blocked by SBL:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[1.2.3.4]: 554 5.7.1
sen...@domain.com: Sender
Peter Micunek wrote:
Hi all,
I need to dump lookup table transport.cdb. I tried it via postmap:
postmap -s cdb:transport
postmap: fatal: cdb table transport.cdb: sequence operation is not supported
Hmm. I thought I fixed this? I'll see.
Is there any way to do it?
Meanwhile, you can use
ram wrote:
Sorry for this OT post .. but I think this is a common problem for all
postfix admins
We run smtp services for our clients using smtp-auth. And nowadays we
also enforce a strong password (minimum alphanumeric)
But still people's passwords get compromised. Even a relatively strong
Søren Schrøder wrote:
Greetings.
[]
Jun 30 07:55:42 mailgate postfix/smtpd[39222]: warning: \
87.53.72.254: address not listed for hostname mail.viauc.dk
Jun 30 07:55:42 mailgate postfix/smtpd[39222]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[87.53.72.254]: 550 5.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot
konstantin-m...@gmx.de wrote:
Hallo!
My postfix receives mails but I can not send mails via SMTP. This is a part of
my log file:
[]
Jun 24 20:49:48 serverxyz postfix/smtpd[30748]: NOQUEUE: reject: \
RCPT from -123456.pool.mediaWays.net[xx.xx.xx.xx]: \
550 5.1.1
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Hi.
As I'm new on that group I would like to welcome everyone.
I've noticed that in my SMTP filtering server a lot of spam try to get
through. I want to block it but the problem is all these emails starts
from | (pipe). How to block it then ?
Please provide an
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Hi Terry,
Thank you for your reply.
It's not full log just only grepped by pattern and it's just only one
example:
[]
ost1-v-4-63.static.adsl.vol.cz[62.177.85.63];
from=|arl.b...@domain_name.com to=|arl.b...@domain_name.com
proto=ESMTP
Jaroslaw, if you want help, please reply to the list,
not to me personally.
Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote:
Stop accepting mail for unknown recipients in your domains.
I will change my question then. How can I reject messages for unknown
recipients when all recipients
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Dear list,
This morning I stumbled upon a strange problem. Mail delivery to an
exchange backend did not work:
refused to talk to me: 501 5.5.4 Invalid Address)
After some troubleshooting an googling I found
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291828.
When using the
ram wrote:
I have a mailing list server where an application sends mails to list
members using /usr/sbin/sendmail ( on commandline)
When the mailing is going on I find that /usr/sbin/sendmail takes quiet
some time to return even for a trivial message
For eg.
sendmail -f r...@netcore.co.in
Simon Wilson wrote:
I'm running Postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5.3 x64 (Postfix installed from
CentOS repository). Firstly thank you to the writers for a great piece
of software... :)
Postconf -n:
[]
Setup works a treat, has been running great for a few weeks. I sent an
email to about 10 people, 2
Bill Cole wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote, On 3/14/09 4:13 PM:
Henk van Oers wrote:
[...]
I the case of multiple recipients there can be rejects for some,
no tests for some others (OK), a few test for DUNNO recipients
and all the checks for the rest. Right?
Yes. For each recipient
Henk van Oers wrote:
Quote from header_checks (5):
DUNNO Pretend that the input line did not match any pat-
tern, and inspect the next input line. This action
can be used to shorten the table search.
For backwards compatibility reasons,
Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Henk van Oers wrote:
[]
I was trying to use action OK to jump out of header checks.
That is: not only skip the next patterns, but also the next
input lines.
[]
Isn't it better to use the same semantics as in restrictions
Res wrote:
[]
on our internal email servers (and on my personal one) I use
milter-regex to stop all those pesky cable/dial/dsl users, its great
because i can also use this rule in milter-regex.conf :
reject Access Denied ; Please use the English language when
communicating with us
header
ram wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
[r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
r...@netcore.co.in
[r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
rihad wrote:
[]
allowed. I will replace $myhostname in MySQL with its expanded value
once I get the query to happen at all...
How about adding the following single line to your postfix
startup script, before executing postfix's master:
postconf -e
69 matches
Mail list logo
