On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 07:26:25AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2022-08-22 Ruben Safir wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:50:51AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> >> You could use a check_sender_access restriction with a regular
> >> expression like thi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:50:51AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2022-08-21 Ruben Safir wrote:
> > any way I can block all bagels using access
> >
> > 2022-08-09T22:38:19.695815-04:00 www2 postfix/qmgr[31914]: 2251E16403D:
> > from=,
> > size=9363, nrcpt=1
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:50:51AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2022-08-21 Ruben Safir wrote:
> > any way I can block all bagels using access
> >
> > 2022-08-09T22:38:19.695815-04:00 www2 postfix/qmgr[31914]: 2251E16403D:
> > from=,
> > size=9363, nrcpt=1
any way I can block all bagels using access
2022-08-09T22:38:19.695815-04:00 www2 postfix/qmgr[31914]: 2251E16403D:
from=,
size=9363, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2022-08-09T22:39:09.275352-04:00 www2 postfix/qmgr[31914]: ECA0316403D:
from=,
size=9442, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
automated systems with root access are inherently not secure
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 03:30:57PM +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that LetsDNS release 1.0 is now available and
> ready for public use.
>
> Website: https://letsdns.org
> GitHub :
So, I rebuilt my entire mailserver and still have issues. When I built
dovecot and postfix using the instructions on the postfix docs, it left
me with some problems and oddities. The instructions were from:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
and the sister dovecot docs
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 12:33:57PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2022-01-22 at 23:00:55 UTC-0500 (Sat, 22 Jan 2022 23:00:55 -0500)
> Ruben Safir
> is rumored to have said:
>
> >I am really lost as to why dovecot is not authenticating
> >
> >I have
&g
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 12:37:00AM -0600, Rob McGee wrote:
> On 2022-01-22 21:53, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >Sorry not main, in master
> >
> >On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:51:31PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >>Is this an error?
> >>
> >>smtp ine
I am really lost as to why dovecot is not authenticating
I have
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
in main.cf
and
# Postfix smtp-auth
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
mode = 0666
user = postfix
group = postfix
}
in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf
I want it to authenticate on
Sorry not main, in master
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:51:31PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> Is this an error?
>
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
>
> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o syslog_name=postfi
Is this an error?
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o syslog_name=postfix/submission
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:14:58AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 04:50:11PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 18.01.22 10:32, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > >I am sorry, that is wrong. I am getting main and master confused.
> > [...]
How do I kn
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 04:50:11PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 18.01.22 10:32, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >I am sorry, that is wrong. I am getting main and master confused.
> [...]
>
> >THIS is in Master
> >www2:/etc/postfix # grep "smtpd" mast
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:47:05AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > UNDER main.cf I have this:
> >
> > smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining, permit
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:36:34AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
> >
>
> I don't need the milter I assume?
>
I have this line as well, which I think might be wrong
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd <
> -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
>
I don't need the milter I assume?
> Wietse
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
DRM is
I am sorry, that is wrong. I am getting main and master confused.
This is in main
www2:/etc/postfix # grep "^smtpd" main.cf
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_invalid_hostname,
regexp:/etc/postfix/helo.regexp, permit
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:43:11AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse:
> > I think it is a mistake to enforce Spamhaus for clients that connect
> > to port 578. Clients on port 25 must authenticate.
>
> Ruben Safir:
> > I agree, but I don't know how to control rules
78.
how to control rules for 587? Is that controlled by the
submission init n - n - - smtpd
??
>
> > Ruben Safir:
> > > I agree, but I don't know how to control rules for 587?
> > > How do I tell it to do something only on port 587?
> >
> >
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:47:04AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > >
> > > I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't
> > > understand your statement that "It is hitting on port
> > > 587" I'm not sure what you mean by "
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:41:55PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2022-01-11 at 19:58:09 UTC-0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:58:09 -0500)
> Ruben Safir
> is rumored to have said:
>
> >>
> >>I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't
> >>understand your statem
>
> I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't
> understand your statement that "It is hitting on port
> 587" I'm not sure what you mean by "It".
It means that thunderbird, outside the network, is reaching across the
internet and tickling port 587 on postfix and it doesn't care... it
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:14:34AM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +1100, raf wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:10:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> > > wrote:
> >
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:10:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > > > > smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
> > > > > smtpd_
> > >
> > > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > > smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
> > > smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
> >
> > Can't this be done with tls withouth dovecot or sasl?
>
> Authentication is needed by Dovecot for IMAP access
> to read email. So it should be available for use by
> Postfix as
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 11:20:09AM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:20:31AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:19:49PM +1100, raf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 06:52:23AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> > > wrote:
>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:19:49PM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 06:52:23AM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > I want to add a domain for the office in addition to my current domain.
> >
> > I've done this before, following the outline in:
I want to add a domain for the office in addition to my current domain.
I've done this before, following the outline in:
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html#canonical
using
[ruben@www2 ~]$ cat /etc/postfix/main.cf|grep mydest
mydestination = www.domain1.com, www2.domain1.com,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 07:56:12AM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 23:55, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
> >us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
>
> local envelope sender should be rejected in port 25, no real users
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 07:56:12AM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 23:55, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
> >us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
>
> local envelope sender should be rejected in port 25, no real users
&
On 11/16/21 19:57, raf wrote:
> This only applies the check for email that isn't coming
> from your own networks/users.
Sorry - I misunderstood. Thanks I will study this
Reuvain
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:57:28AM +1100, raf wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:55:03PM -0500, Ruben Safir
> wrote:
>
> > I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
> > us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
> >
> > How do I block email with this on
I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
How do I block email with this on the From line
>From cpa...@mrbrklyn.com Tue Nov 16 03:59:34 2021
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Received: from
>
> however, the "allow" and "deny" clearly say something, while for
> understanding what does "white" and "black" mean, you must have some
> background (or, worse, prejudice).
>
However, those are regular Enlgish words that now get mixed up with the
technology making it harder to communicate
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:27:52PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2021, at 11:38, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:46:04AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >
> >>I am getting this strange rejections to talk to NYC government
> >>
> [...]
&
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:38:57AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:46:04AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> > I am getting this strange rejections to talk to NYC government
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822; cdeut...@council.nyc.gov
> > Or
I am getting this strange rejections to talk to NYC government
Final-Recipient: rfc822; cdeut...@council.nyc.gov
Original-Recipient: rfc822;cdeut...@council.nyc.gov
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.3
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; delivery temporarily suspended: Host or
domain name
not found. Name
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:02:08AM +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2021-01-05 Ruben Safir wrote:
> > Any clue why this is happening from the cointalk.com domain
> > I am locked out of the forum :)
> >
> > 2021-01-05T03:11:38.999012-05:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[26176]
I'm sorry to bother everyone
Any clue why this is happening from the cointalk.com domain
I am locked out of the forum :)
2021-01-05T03:11:38.999012-05:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[26176]: NOQUEUE:
reject: RCPT from 23-111-188-110.static.hvvc.us[23.111.188.110]: 450
4.1.8 : Sender address rejected:
I'm sorry
I failed to get the last message. Please resend
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Fulvio Scapin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> With a prospective of non-native English speaker, I believe that,
> political correctness aside, a name which does not involve a cultural
> reference for the related function to be understood is a welcome
> change since
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 02:06:14AM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Ralph and Nicolas - I fully agree with you both.
>
> While I can somehow understand American fixations on political correctness,
It is not American. It is a small group of international fanatics... in
general.
> I find it
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:43:08PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 2020-06-07 14:46, Laura Smith wrote:
> >> The point here is
> >> that maybe this is just a small, insignificant, easy change that could
> >> be done that might make black folks feel less excluded and more
> >> interested in
On 6/6/20 10:54 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> Yes. This. Though I do think that having a casual and constant reinforcement
> that black == bad helps people justify their racist beliefs.
No it doesn't and black doesn't equal bad, although dark does... and for
good reason, because darkness hides things
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:46:14PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Ian Evans:
> > > Food for thought from the co-author of OAuth and oEmbed. How easy would it
> > > be for Postfix/Postscreen configs/docs to, say, refer to allow/deny lists?
> >
> > Easily, if they can be acessed
postfix can do this without further infrastructure
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:53:38AM -0800, Lucius Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 08:44:40PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > I got this email, which I thought I set up postfix to block
>
> Setup SPFi (SPF hardfail) , DKIM,
I got this email, which I thought I set up postfix to block
>From ru...@mrbrklyn.com Wed Feb 6 06:26:12 2019
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Received: from mail.isentia.asia (mail.mediabanc.ws [203.223.144.88])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:23:54PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > I get this when sending email to the new domain
> >
> > 2018-06-20T12:10:14.319765-04:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[13841]: NOQUEUE:
> > reject: RCPT from l2mail1.panix.com[166.84.1.75]: 454 4.7.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:54:54AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Ruben Safir:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to
> > > be sent out
Hello
I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to
be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default. I have it
set up at the moment so that any domain that you try to send though
get rewritten to the default, mrbrklyn.com. But I'd like this new
domain to be allowed
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:41:39AM +0100, Christian Kivalo wrote:
> On 2016-02-29 08:43, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >Can I have input about this recommendation? Is there unreasonable
> >security
> >risk? I think not, but I want to double check
>
> That look
Can I have input about this recommendation? Is there unreasonable security
risk? I think not, but I want to double check
On 02/28/2016 10:51 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 01:34 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> I think we can fix your issue fairly simply.
>>
>> Please, a
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:46:40AM +, Richard wrote:
>
>
> > Date: Sunday, February 28, 2016 21:07:19 -0500
> > From: Ruben Safir <ru...@mrbrklyn.com>
> >
> > Ah - ok I'm learning something at least..
> >
> > Mostly some address bounces,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 07:37:34PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Feb 28 17:17:18 2016 (29233)
> > <CAJS-itcfOi9J2dgX0U_+NR=RkywLeBgvgoE2z67TVL=of71...@mail.gmail.com> smtp
> > to hangout for 10 recips, completed in 69.241 seconds
>
> What i
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:41:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Seems that mailman is unable to send messages to postfix fast enough
>
> When Mailman is falling behind, what is the number of SMTP deliveries
> per second from Mailman to Postfix?
>
>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:29:21PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:13:44AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > What can c
On 02/28/2016 05:46 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 02:26 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
>> On 02/28/2016 12:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>>
>>> If there are more than one or two files in the out/ queue, and if the
>>> smtp log has successive entries
On 02/28/2016 12:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 07:29 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
>>
>> No, I mean I send messages and they don't show up for a half hour even
>> in the postfix logs
>
>
> Assuming Mailman 2.1.x, the usual cause of this is a backlogged
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:18:20PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/19/2016 1:11 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > Can aanyone clarify what this means? it is happing a lot on my mail server
> >
> > Feb 19 14:09:31 www postfix/smtpd[6978]: warning:
> > 70.14.214.162.list.dsbl.
Can aanyone clarify what this means? it is happing a lot on my mail server
Feb 19 14:09:31 www postfix/smtpd[6978]: warning: 70.14.214.162.list.dsbl.org:
RBL lookup error: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=70.14.214.162.list.dsbl.org type=A: Host not found, try again
I did some upgrades with opensuse this week and suddenly on 10-30
all the logging just stopped, and it seems not to be in journalctl either
The last messages were
www:/etc/postfix # tail -f //var/log/mail
2015-10-30T07:08:00.658324-04:00 www postfix/smtp[27484]: 17F581624D1:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 09:43:36AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no
> > trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking 3
> > hours to turn over message
Hi
I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no
trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking
3 hours to turn over messages. And I don't have this problem
with normal email, just when I use mailman. DNS is running on the same machine.
What can cause the
) is not a valid
return address.
Oct 14 06:13:06 some_server.com majordomo[21883] {root@some_server.com (root)}
ABORT Majordomo@some_server.com: root@some_server.com (root) is not a valid
return address.
Oct 14 06:13:55 some_server.com majordomo[21897] {ruben@some_server.com (Ruben
Safir)} ABORT
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 05:17:20PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:27:10PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Ruben Safir:
> > > > Can't I get postfix to bounce this when it is coming outside the
> > > > next
I thought I blocked access to recieving spoofed email headed with From
users when the mail is coming from outside the network. I recieved this
one today, with my email address on it.
>From www-d...@drv5-gylq.accessdomain.com Sat Oct 10 11:01:13 2015
Return-Path:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:27:10PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Can't I get postfix to bounce this when it is coming outside the
> > nextwork?
>
> Yes, but then you would not receive the following email:
>
> Received: by mrbrklyn.com
WHat are some suggsted methods of whitelisting with postfix.
I am throwing in the flag and want to prevent email to me without my
specific permision, and to bounce the rest.
Ruben
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:38:52AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
As for Debian, perhaps we can persuade LaMont to fix the Debian
package
and
RedHat calls postfix set-permissions and postfix
upgrade-configuration in RPM %post scripts
Why do distros ignore my safety nets and ship
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:02:21PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
RedHat calls postfix set-permissions and postfix upgrade-configuration
in RPM %post scripts
What? postfix wasn't absorbed into systemd?
How is that possible?
Ruben
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
:) well, we people from brooklyn sometimes need to be told twice.
I hope twice was enough. Add a correct mydomain setting to
main.cf.
Yes and thanks for the explaination and the fix.
Ruben
--
Viktor.
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn,
That will work. Another solution is setting append_dot_mydomain=no,
so that user@localhost will become u...@localhost.com.
Yes - I am confused by this a little bit. Why would postfix want to add
a dot com to any outgoing email?
Ruben
--
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI
Hello
I thought there was a means to restrict and/convert all the outgoing
mail that passes though postfix to specific domain names. I've noticed
that on several postfix installations that the sending domain name in
the envelopes From can be changed to almost anything. How do I
restrict it?
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 05:28:28AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 01:05:43AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 04:42:01AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:58:17PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
I used fetchmail to retreive
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 04:42:01AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:58:17PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
localhost.com. Obviously
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 03:13:51AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 19 Sep 2014, at 20:58 , Ruben Safir ru...@mrbrklyn.com wrote:
I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
localhost.com. Obviously I've made
I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
localhost.com. Obviously I've made a big error somewhere, but I can't
track it down
Sep 19 22:52:36 www postfix/error[11778]: 26479161244:
to=ru...@localhost.com,
What is the most straight method of hooking up a milter for blackhole
services. I've had more than a fewest suggestions and read a few
different methods, but I'm left puzzled as to the best means of doing
this.
Ruben
--
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com -
How do I get postfix to reject mails From my own domains coming from
outside the local network?
Ruben
--
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
I'm an engineer. I choose the best tool for the job, politics be damned.
You must
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
Von: Ruben Safir ru...@mrbrklyn.com
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: restricting acceptence of mail users except from local network
How do I get
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:46:18PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/23/2010 6:30 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
What is the most straight method of hooking up a milter for blackhole
services. I've had more than a fewest suggestions and read a few
different methods, but I'm left puzzled as to the best
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
Von: Ruben Safir ru...@mrbrklyn.com
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: restricting acceptence of mail users except from local network
How do I get
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:23:11PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/23/2010 7:35 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
Von: Ruben Safirru...@mrbrklyn.com
An: postfix-users
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:32:57PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 23-Feb-10 17:32, Ruben Safir wrote:
How do I get postfix to reject mails From my own domains coming from
outside the local network?
This is a FAQ, and a complicated one.
Are you trying to just block any email that is from
u
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:00PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 23-Feb-10 20:48, Ruben Safir wrote:
This is getting philophical and I just don't care. Mail From our domain
has to originate from OUR domain. No exceptions.
Then you've already been given the solution by Noel.
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:23:11PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/23/2010 7:35 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:25 -0500
Von: Ruben Safirru...@mrbrklyn.com
An: postfix-users
Anyway to restrict the From: header to the local domain as well as the
Fromwhitespace header
It seems that Majordomo will accept the mail if the From: is different
than the From
From mrbrk...@panix.com
From: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
I'd like to reject it at the mail server if either
Hello
I have this puzzle that I can't figure out. I had my mailing list
working on openSuSE 11.2
with postfix and majordomo. I've been using majordomo on sendmailf or
years with no trouble.
I moved to postfix with no trouble and now, suddenly I'm getting nothing
through to my lists.
I know
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
Aliases look like this
majordomo: |/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo
That's how I run majordomo on my machine.
If I
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:18:10PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
Aliases look like this
majordomo: |/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo
This script will run as nobody unless a non-root user owns the
aliases.db
On 01/22/2010 05:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
If I recall correctly, the wrapper program needs to be installed
set-uid, and it needs to be configured at compile time with the
right uid/gid information.
Ruben Safir:
I
On 01/22/2010 01:18 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
Aliases look like this
majordomo: |/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo
This script will run as nobody unless a non-root user owns the
aliases.db file from
It would help if you posted the log messages you receive along with the
information provided here: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html.
After you do that then we can try and help you.
Thanks,
Daniel
Thanks Daniel
The relevant log area says this:
an 22 17:49:47 www2
On 01/22/2010 07:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Majordomo is a Perl script, so you can debug it with all the standard
Perl debugging features.
This discussion is no longer appropriate for the Postfix mailing
list, so this is my last post.
Thanks for the help. What you've told me has been
94 matches
Mail list logo
