On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 10:40:18 -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:37:32 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
...
Can you ping the maintainer?
...
I have sent him an email
ACK.
--
Sahil Tandon
have supported it.
Based on src/util/dict_db.c, the latest supported Berkeley DB major
version is 5.
--
Sahil Tandon
rolled out snapshot 20140507, to
which we will upgrade soon.
Thank you both.
--
Sahil Tandon
:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
transport_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/transport
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/243056
--
Sahil Tandon
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 03:31:13 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:49:20PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
We are experiencing a problem that seems to manifest *only* when
delivering to MXs that exhibit the SSL problem described by Viktor[1]
AND connection caching
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 23:57:41 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 03:31:13 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:49:20PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
We are experiencing a problem that seems to manifest *only* when
delivering to MXs that exhibit
dmarc_moderation_action and dmarc_quarantine_moderation_action
in Mailman rather than changing Postfix.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 18:40:39 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 14:55:49 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I'm getting local user unknown errors when I try to send email to the
list., but as far as I know, I shouldn't need local aliases
that Postfix
is made aware of valid Mailman addresses. In your follow-up, include the
output of 'postconf -n' rather than snippets from main.cf. See:
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-install/postfix-integration.html
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#alias_maps
--
Sahil Tandon
, is output after you issue the following commands?
# ls -ld /var/spool/postfix/public{,/pickup}
and
# postfix check
--
Sahil Tandon
of the maildrop queue, pickup(8) sees the new
mail and passes it to cleanup(8), as logged below.
Mar 12 08:00:06 postfix/cleanup[21191]: 5B5A81E01ED:
message-id=20140312130006.5B5A81E01ED@localhost
Mar 12 08:00:06 postfix/qmgr[20944]: 5B5A81E01ED: from=m...@workdomain.com,
...
--
Sahil Tandon
/query-pr.cgi?pr=181994
--
Sahil Tandon
, won't it?
Yes, but remember that transport mapping occurs after address rewriting;
take care to accordingly specify the lookup keys in your transport
table.
--
Sahil Tandon
years
ago. :-)
http://sys4.de/en/blog/2013/04/08/postfix-dovecot-mailbox-quota/
--
Sahil Tandon
a 550 or something else from postfix/smtp
--- Any ideas what I have done wrong?
[ .. ]
smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/listed_senders reject_unlisted_sender
Instead, try:
# main.cf
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/listed_senders, reject
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 11:09:33 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
[ .. ]
Instead, try:
# main.cf
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/listed_senders, reject
To be clear, this will not help in your test case (but rather, only when
mail is received via smtpd) as Wietse points out.
--
Sahil
-users
*nod*
It seems the old link stopped working earlier this year; I remember
seeing a mention of this on the SA issues tracker and just found it:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6898
--
Sahil Tandon
.
Use virtual alias mapping to direct mail for user{1,2}@domain.tld to
actual accounts. Then, implement a catch-all which maps *@domain.tld to
an address that, via transport(5), directs mail to the discard(8)
service.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 05:10:09 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
...
In our previous episode (Thursday, 11-Apr-2013), Sahil Tandon said:
As documented, Postfix uses the default Berkeley DB version that ships
with your system, which I am assuming is FreeBSD.
Yes, FreeBSD VeryOld-stable
) output. Or, you can disable
Berkeley DB support entirely by including -DNO_DB in CCARGS.
--
Sahil Tandon
is for others who
might chance upon this chain in the archives, and prefer the alternative
(and IMHO more robust) approach.
--
Sahil Tandon
listed:
/hold-users:
us...@domain.com HOLD
us...@domain.com HOLD
...
The HOLD action affects all recipients; you can be more specific by
using the retry service. See the following thread:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/197989
--
Sahil Tandon
similar statistics. No promises that
it is error-free.
[1] http://people.freebsd.org/~sahil/scripts/mailstats.py.txt
--
Sahil Tandon
/gmane.mail.postfix.user/148887
Read the entire thread before trying to implement the suggestion
solutions.
--
Sahil Tandon
Maildir delivery, use .forward files that
specify a destination mailbox name ending in '/'.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 19:13:04 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 08:18:09AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
Some background: upon deinstall, unaltered files installed by a FreeBSD
package are supposed to be deleted. In the context of Postfix
Come
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 09:01:23 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Sahil Tandon postfix-users@postfix.org:
...
test -n `$POSTCONF -c $config_directory -n smtpd_relay_restrictions`
With this, the forward compatibility shim would only trigger
the FreeBSD port.
--
Sahil Tandon
is that a _successful_ refresh probe
updates the timestamp of an address verification result; positive expire
time is measured from that revised timestamp.
--
Sahil Tandon
queue, use the retry service.
/path/to/main.cf:
transport_maps = hash:/path/to/transport
/path/to/transport:
mda.example.com retry:4.2.1 mda.example.com is temporarily disabled
--
Sahil Tandon
:
print('200 DUNNO')
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 00:03:06 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
On 02/06/12 17:44, Sahil Tandon wrote:
...
I've separately engaged our DNS admins in case they could offer some
insight, but it would be interesting to learn if others are experiencing
the same issue /only/ with barracuda.
I see
the same issue /only/ with barracuda.
--
Sahil Tandon
-line code change has no performance
impact for other systems, and eliminates a high-frequency accept()
race on a shared socket that appears to cause trouble on FreeBSD. The
same single_server program driver has proven itself for many years in
smtpd(8). Problem reported by Sahil Tandon.
I've been
.
Thanks for any assistance. I've gone through the virtual and local
readmes, but I am not seeing the solution.
Can we see the output of 'postconf -n'? Absent additional information,
I guess you may find a clue in virtual(5) under TABLE SEARCH ORDER.
--
Sahil Tandon
Just following up to close this discussion.
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 09:35:24 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
May 5 10:00:26 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: warning: psc_dnsbl_request:
connect to private/dnsblog service: Connection refused
May 5 10:00:26 mx1 last message
now running postscreen with '-v' and will report back if
the same scenario recurs.
--
Sahil Tandon
469
1609/18263 zen.spamhaus.org 5
UNIQ/TOTAL DNSWLDNSBL
2514/2520list.dnswl.org 510
0/6 swl.spamhaus.org 0
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 19:49:18 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: CONNECT from
[88.23.204.109]:40294 to [69.147.83.52]:25
May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[45237]: addr 88.23.204.109 listed by
domain bl.spameatingmonkey.net
CONNECTs.
I could not find references to this issue in the archives, and I know
others manage much higher-volume sites, so I suspect it just indicates a
severely borked system (FreeBSD 8.3) on my side.
--
Sahil Tandon
just gets a 4xx after passing
the deep protocol tests. As per design, future connections are passed on
to smtpd(8) which then delivers the mail.
Please let me know if any other portions of the log or a full 'postconf
-n' (I'll just have to sanitize certain portions) would be useful.
--
Sahil
)
35/220 reject (all server ports busy)
3/374 reject (too many connections)
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/224979
[2] http://people.freebsd.org/~sahil/scripts/mailstats.py.txt
--
Sahil Tandon
, to smtpd_reject_footer.
Another option is to extend smtpd_reject_footer's feature set,
so that
smtpd_reject_footer = \c Text to append
Will append the text without starting a new line. All other
smtpd_reject_footer features would work as before.
Elegant. +1 FWIW.
--
Sahil Tandon
. http://rob0.nodns4.us/howto/
--
Sahil Tandon
-test' into two distinct recipients 'gul+1' and
'gul+2'. Then, procmail should receive both copies of the message.
--
Sahil Tandon
parameter (which I had added
according to:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/277428)
might not be available any more. This parameter is no nonger valid?
...
Still used in the code; not documented. Most people should not have to
fiddle with this parameter.
--
Sahil Tandon
decides that me+xmpp and me+sms is the same user, and
leaves only one copy of the message.
Do you have logs of this occurring?
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 16:00:26 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local
delivery. Messages for me+sms goes
are in /usr/local/openldap/lib64 and belong to LTB v2.4.x
...
/usr/local/openldap/lib != /usr/local/openldap/lib64
--
Sahil Tandon
='', but with the same above
outcome. Are there any other parameters to pass to disable debug?
...
DEBUG=
--
Sahil Tandon
in the thread, thus preserving Wietse's safety net for incompatible
changes in IPv6 defaults.
PS: if anyone on this list is a FreeBSD user with interest in the
maintenance of the Postfix ports, please get in touch off-list.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 10:08:05 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
FWIW, the FreeBSD Postfix port is patched so that post-install does not
add inet_protocols=ipv4 to main.cf during upgrades. Instead, users are
notified[1] about the recent change of defaults, and asked to append
through extra hoops, or that
you should revert the change. This is a FreeBSD port-specific problem
created by me that I will address as soon as I can.
--
Sahil Tandon
pgpAExDgZOayr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:48:48 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
I do not believe Mark should have to jump through extra hoops, or that
you should revert the change. This is a FreeBSD port-specific problem
created by me that I will address as soon as I can.
Considering
port. I elected to go this route to force users to pay attention to
this particular change.
--
Sahil Tandon
--- conf/post-install.orig 2011-10-11 20:39:19.0 -0400
+++ conf/post-install 2011-10-11 20:41:58.0 -0400
@@ -790,18 +790,6 @@
EOF
}
-# Postfix 2.9
laughably strains credulity; no one cares
about the ins and outs of your configuration. Before asking for help
again, make sure to review the DEBUG_README (a document to which you
were referred upon joining this mailing list).
...
--
Sahil Tandon
pgp9iILLYIubx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
the relevant smtpd_recipient_restrictions options I using for this are
...
Show the output of 'postconf -n' instead of cut pasting from your
main.cf.
--
Sahil Tandon
(SERVFAIL)
This is treated as a temporary error condition, so Postfix applies
reject_tempfail_action, which defaults to defer_if_permit.
...
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 23:09:24 -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 13:37:52 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
In the absence of full information, here's a WAG:
...
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
rejected: cannot find your hostname
it off-list or to a more
appropriate forum, e.g. the mailop list?
--
Sahil Tandon
descriptor passing code.
OK, thanks for the context.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 07:09:15 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
These warnings appear a few times daily, and are sometimes followed by:
warning: disabling connection caching
This occurs on a slightly older Postfix (2.7.1). The machine receives
mail from the internet
mx0 postfix/smtp[53020]: B60FD8FC14:
to=f...@example.org, relay=internal.example.org[ip_address]:25,
delay=9.9, delays=1.1/8.6/0/0.07, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok:
queued as 5325E1065677)
...
--
Sahil Tandon
that, the client foolishly sends
DATA, to which Postfix responds with a 554. Finally, instead of
gracefully QUITing, the client drops the connection.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:42:30 +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Sahil Tandon sahil+post...@tandon.net [2011-12-05 03:24]:
I'm using Postfix with MySQL via proxy:mysql maps. The documentation
states that mails should get deferred if no mysql server is reachable.
However when I
- as noted
earlier - depends on which facet of Postfix is impacted, which in turn
depends on the parameters/tables configured to query an SQL backend.
--
Sahil Tandon
to reject quite a bit of the freemail garbage.
+1, FWIW.
--
Sahil Tandon
://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/140543
--
Sahil Tandon
--
Sahil Tandon
) if master.cf is not found. This is new to me, and could very
well be idiosyncratic to my installation procedure. But before I
troubleshoot further on my end, I wonder if anyone else can generally
reproduce this?
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 18:08:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
When trying to install snapshot 2018, I get a fatal postconf error
if master.cf does not exist in the $config_directory. There is no
problem if main.cf is missing from $config_directory; bin/postconf only
seems
://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.2003071512/postfix-current-2.9.20111012,4.log
[2] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-November/071419.html
--
Sahil Tandon
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 20:41:08 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
This error was reported to me by a FreeBSD user, but I cannot reproduce
it on any of my development machines. It occurs during build (sorry for
line wraps):
rm -f ../../conf/main.cf.default
cp postconf
: reject: RCPT from
unknown[193.83.162.5]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find
your reverse hostname, [193.83.162.5]
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unknown_client_reject_code
--
Sahil Tandon
list archive for similar discussions.
If it could indexed for easier searching that would be great!
This has to happen outside of Postfix.
--
Sahil Tandon
dedicated IP
74.63.3.132 to 220 www.alwaysbuywholesale.com ESMTP Postfix and
still keep the correct banner of 220 vps.velvetpixel.net ESMTP Postfix
for 74.63.2.190?
Set an alternative smtpd_banner for the smtpd(8) listener on
74.63.3.132.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 12:34:41 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 10:29:20 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
telnet 74.63.3.132 smtp
Trying 74.63.3.132...
Connected to alwaysbuywholesale.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220
:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/183665
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/123550
You may search the list archives for other examples, but the underlying
notion is that multiple deliveries require multiple recipients.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 18:38:22 -0400, john wrote:
Does anybody know of a program... that can white list inbound email
based upon the addresses of emails that have been sent?
http://mailfud.org/postpals/
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
and the output of 'postconf -n' on the machine with a problem.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
in the RELEASE_NOTES for 2.8.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
in the $daemon_directory; their
redundant placement in $config_directory is obsolete. Similarly,
the other files noted above were replicas of man pages which are still
installed.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
on the
gateway might solve your problem.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
of 'postconf -n'.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
that a simple virtual alias
mapping is more suitable than jumping through canonical hoops.
Oh, and in your follow-up: please, show logs that relate to your problem
description.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
, that is the example provided in the postconf(5)
manual.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
them to the appropriate maintainer.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
This is something the OP can do in *addition* to more practical things
(as Noel suggested) to help mail reach its recipients on a remote site.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
related to handling of null byte/char.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 19:20:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
Appears to work in bash and zsh; not in (t)csh. I quickly tested on
FreeBSD and Darwin. Likely related to handling of null byte/char.
I'm away from home, so I can't quickly fire up a ksh box. It certainly
does
.
Perhaps you could direct those emails to a pipe(8) transport.
http://www.postfix.org/pipe.8.html
http://www.postfix.org/transport.5.html
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#transport_maps
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
to... $mydestination
(!):
Sorry, I am not familiar with eventum; but piping certain recipients to
a script is doable in Postfix. Please follow the documentation, and
follow-up in this thread if you have a specific problem with your
configuration.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
is in any way
recorded in main.cf?
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
to the beast that is autoconf; that, IMHO,
is a good thing.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
joining this
mailing list:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
For general information about LDAP support in Postfix:
http://www.postfix.org/LDAP_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
the reject_rbl_client on the
smtpd_sender_restrictions.
If someone could clarify this to me it would be great.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
somewhere for analysis. Use the '-w' flag in
tcpdump to save the capture to a file.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
.
You misunderstand. As documented in error(8), when the service name is
retry, Postfix defers all recipients in the delivery request using the
next-hop information as the reason for non-delivery.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
.
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 23:57:18 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/22/2011 09:06 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 17:16:52 +0200, Leon Meßner wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:39:22PM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 05/22/2011 04:24 PM Leon Meßner wrote:
Hi,
i'm curious
1 - 100 of 746 matches
Mail list logo
