Eliezer Croitoru:
> On 07/03/2012 02:33, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Eliezer Croitoru:
> >> i dont care about any init scripts on whatever else then when there is
> >> this specific problem of mismatching binding an ip that dosnt exist to
> >> be checked using the "postfix check" method on terminal an
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:01:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> So you need a way for "postfix start" that returns status 0 if the
> master(8) daemon initalizes successfully, and non-zero otherwise.
>
> I think this can be done by starting the master as a foreground
> process. The foreground ma
On 07/03/2012 02:33, Wietse Venema wrote:
Eliezer Croitoru:
i dont care about any init scripts on whatever else then when there is
this specific problem of mismatching binding an ip that dosnt exist to
be checked using the "postfix check" method on terminal and not only on log.
Sorry, only the
Eliezer Croitoru:
> i dont care about any init scripts on whatever else then when there is
> this specific problem of mismatching binding an ip that dosnt exist to
> be checked using the "postfix check" method on terminal and not only on log.
Sorry, only the master daemon knows that it can't acc
On 06/03/2012 21:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/06/12 14:10, Wietse Venema wrote:
Eray Aslan:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:48:35AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
I think that making everyone wait would be another example of
well-meaning people doing things that give Postfix a bad reputation.
p
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:01:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> So you need a way for "postfix start" that returns status 0 if the
> master(8) daemon initalizes successfully, and non-zero otherwise.
Correct.
> I think this can be done by starting the master as a foreground
> process. The foregr
Eray Aslan:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:30:59PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > either. Right now the problem is easy to understand: half of the time on
> > Gentoo, the startup "OK" is meaningless. Everyone knows this, and
> > figures out how to deal with it quickly:
> >
> > backup2 ~ # /etc
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:30:59PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> either. Right now the problem is easy to understand: half of the time on
> Gentoo, the startup "OK" is meaningless. Everyone knows this, and
> figures out how to deal with it quickly:
>
> backup2 ~ # /etc/init.d/postfix stop
>
Michael Orlitzky:
> backup2 ~ # killall -9 /usr/lib64/postfix/master
> backup2 ~ # /etc/init.d/postfix start
>* WARNING: postfix has already been started
That is a bug in an init script, and is the responsibility
of the OS-specific maintainer. Postfix does not provide
init/upstart/systemd/
On 03/06/12 14:10, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Eray Aslan:
>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:48:35AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> I think that making everyone wait would be another example of
>>> well-meaning people doing things that give Postfix a bad reputation.
>>
>> postfix start exits successfully b
10 matches
Mail list logo
