Matthias Fechner wrote in
:
|Am 10.03.2023 um 13:01 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
|> In the old days I used the tags to filter my messages and place them \
|> in the
|> right mailbox. With the advent of DMARC I stopped that and turned \
|> to using
|> List-Id:-headers as
Am 10.03.2023 um 13:01 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
In the old days I used the tags to filter my messages and place them in the
right mailbox. With the advent of DMARC I stopped that and turned to using
List-Id:-headers as filter trigger. They are invisible, they don't require
* Phil Biggs via Postfix-users :
> Friday, March 10, 2023, 5:54:02 PM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > I was also quite happy with no tags at all.
In the old days I used the tags to filter my messages and place them in the
right mailbox. With the advent of DMARC I stopped that
Dnia 10.03.2023 o godz. 18:18:50 Phil Biggs via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> Likewise, To keep my mail client's threaded view sane I resorted to using
> header_checks:
>
> /^Subject: \[pfx\] (.*)$/ REPLACE Subject: $1
What a mail client has problem with threading because of a tag in the
subject?
On 10/03/2023 5:24 pm, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> I was also quite happy with
> no tags at all.
+1 no tags
Mal
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Friday, March 10, 2023, 5:54:02 PM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't at all concerned about that, rather the less horizontal
> space any tag takes, more subject I see without horizonal scrolling in
> one-message per line mailbox presentations. I was also quite happy
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:14:31AM -0500, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> >> If I'd change anything I would delete the '-' in the middle of the
> >> current tag.
> >
> > I'm all in favour, though I also be happy with [U], [D], and [A]. :-)
>
> Or we all could be adults and not giggle like
If I'd change anything I would delete the '-' in the middle of the
current tag.
I'm all in favour, though I also be happy with [U], [D], and [A]. :-)
Or we all could be adults and not giggle like little girls at seeing [P-U]
___
Postfix-users
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 05:09:02PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> If I'd change anything I would delete the '-' in the middle of the
> current tag.
I'm all in favour, though I also be happy with [U], [D], and [A]. :-)
--
Viktor.
On 3/9/23 18:41, Roger Klorese via Postfix-users wrote:
Wietse, as a non-native English-speaker: are you aware that “p-u” is a childish
declaration that something stinks?
But are we REALLY all eight years old?
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
Peter via Postfix-users:
> I think that [postfix] or [postfix-users] and [postfix-devel]
> [postfix-announce] are just fine, but if you want shortened versions,
> might I suggest:
>
> [pf] [pf-dev] [pf-ann]
Changed to: [pfx], [pfx-dev], [pfx-ann]
Wietse
On 10/03/23 11:09, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
I am subscribed to several mailing lists that have [uppercase
abbreviation] as their tag, and that works well. None of those tags
are more than 5 characters long.
I have the opposite experience. most of the lists I'm subscribed to
Wietse, as a non-native English-speaker: are you aware that “p-u” is a childish
declaration that something stinks?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 9, 2023, at 2:10 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Peter via Postfix-users:
>>> On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
Friday, March 10, 2023, 9:09:02 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Peter via Postfix-users:
>> On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
>> > I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject
>> > tag was desired, but would [postfix] have been that
Peter via Postfix-users:
> On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
> > I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject
> > tag was desired, but would [postfix] have been that much more distracting,
> > without adding the obvious third-grader label that
I cant agree more.I personally, would appropriate changing the "P-U" subject // Jonathan On Mar 9, 2023 22:47, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
> I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject tag was desired, but
On 10/03/23 10:04, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject tag
was desired, but would [postfix] have been that much more distracting, without
adding the obvious third-grader label that might better be held by qmail?
17 matches
Mail list logo
