Solved (it seems) was: Access from $mynetworks denied

2015-02-23 Thread M. Fioretti
Greetings again, first of all, my apologies for not following up earlier on my initial request, pasted below for your convenience. Truth is, for a lot of reasons not relevant for the list, further experiments on this issues were partly not possible, partly not necessary until this week. Back

Access from $mynetworks denied

2015-01-16 Thread M. Fioretti
Greetings, I have just inherited a postfix 2.6.6 server running on a Centos 6 server, whose postconf -n output is pasted below. Everything seems fine to me (but of course any pointer to security holes, or possibilities for improvement is welcome!) except one thing. This server must relay

Re: Access from $mynetworks denied

2015-01-16 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 16.01.2015 um 10:26 schrieb M. Fioretti: I have just inherited a postfix 2.6.6 server running on a Centos 6 server, whose postconf -n output is pasted below. Everything seems fine to me (but of course any pointer to security holes, or possibilities for improvement is welcome!) except one

Re: Access from $mynetworks denied

2015-01-16 Thread M. Fioretti
On 2015-01-16 14:18, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: *do not* mask public informations, especially if you fail to mask it on all places... Indeed I did. As I said in or between the lines I'm not particularly present these days... So yes, that is the ONLY IP address involved in $mynetworks and in

Re: Access from $mynetworks denied

2015-01-16 Thread Wietse Venema
M. Fioretti: On 2015-01-16 14:18, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: *do not* mask public informations, especially if you fail to mask it on all places... Indeed I did. As I said in or between the lines I'm not particularly present these days... So yes, that is the ONLY IP address involved in

Re: Access from $mynetworks denied

2015-01-16 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/16/2015 3:26 AM, M. Fioretti wrote: Greetings, I have just inherited a postfix 2.6.6 server running on a Centos 6 server, whose postconf -n output is pasted below. Everything seems fine to me (but of course any pointer to security holes, or possibilities for improvement is welcome!)