Correction for the parameter name: debug-peer-list should be debug_peer_list.
Wietse Venema:
> deoren:
> > On 8/24/2018 6:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > deoren:
> > >>> 'mail=0/1' means that Postfix rejected the MAIL FROM command (the
> > >>> client sent 1 MAIL FROM command, and Postfix
deoren:
> On 8/24/2018 6:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > deoren:
> >>> 'mail=0/1' means that Postfix rejected the MAIL FROM command (the
> >>> client sent 1 MAIL FROM command, and Postfix accepted 0 MAIL FROM
> >>> commands).
> >>
> >> Thank you for the response and for going into detail.
> >>
>
On 8/24/2018 6:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
deoren:
'mail=0/1' means that Postfix rejected the MAIL FROM command (the
client sent 1 MAIL FROM command, and Postfix accepted 0 MAIL FROM
commands).
Thank you for the response and for going into detail.
I suspect I completely overlooked it, but do
deoren:
> > 'mail=0/1' means that Postfix rejected the MAIL FROM command (the
> > client sent 1 MAIL FROM command, and Postfix accepted 0 MAIL FROM
> > commands).
>
> Thank you for the response and for going into detail.
>
> I suspect I completely overlooked it, but do you recall offhand where
On 8/23/2018 9:28 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 8/23/18 7:43 PM, deoren wrote:
Here is a direct link to the config file with comments:
https://github.com/deoren/postfix-examples/blob/master/database-server/mysql/my.cnf
OK. Pretty much everything up to skip-name-resolve is compiled-in
On 8/23/2018 7:23 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
'mail=0/1' means that Postfix rejected the MAIL FROM command (the
client sent 1 MAIL FROM command, and Postfix accepted 0 MAIL FROM
commands).
You may want to examine the logs a little closer
On 8/23/2018 7:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
deoren:
On 8/21/2018 6:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Have you looked in Postfix LOGs? For example, if there is a delay
from the start of the probe to the first Postfix logfile record,
then that would indicate a delay with looking up the client
On 8/23/18 7:43 PM, deoren wrote:
>
> Here is a direct link to the config file with comments:
> https://github.com/deoren/postfix-examples/blob/master/database-server/mysql/my.cnf
OK. Pretty much everything up to skip-name-resolve is compiled-in
default values. (And so are most of the ones
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> 'mail=0/1' means that Postfix rejected the MAIL FROM command (the
> client sent 1 MAIL FROM command, and Postfix accepted 0 MAIL FROM
> commands).
>
> You may want to examine the logs a little closer than looking for
> 'connect'. What
deoren:
> On 8/21/2018 6:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Have you looked in Postfix LOGs? For example, if there is a delay
> > from the start of the probe to the first Postfix logfile record,
> > then that would indicate a delay with looking up the client hostname,
> > and then the address for
On 8/22/2018 10:29 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/21/2018 3:17 PM, deoren wrote:
Hi all,
We've been using Postfix for years with good results, but in recent
years have moved to a load-balanced HAProxy front-end with multiple
backend relay nodes. I've consulted various sources during that time
to
On 8/21/2018 7:48 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 8/21/18 4:17 PM, deoren wrote:
Hi all,
We've been using Postfix for years with good results, but in recent
years have moved to a load-balanced HAProxy front-end with multiple
backend relay nodes. I've consulted various sources during that time to
On 8/21/2018 6:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Have you looked in Postfix LOGs? For example, if there is a delay
from the start of the probe to the first Postfix logfile record,
then that would indicate a delay with looking up the client hostname,
and then the address for that hostname.
Thank you
On 8/21/2018 3:17 PM, deoren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've been using Postfix for years with good results, but in recent
> years have moved to a load-balanced HAProxy front-end with multiple
> backend relay nodes. I've consulted various sources during that time
> to perform the initial setup and
On 8/21/18 4:17 PM, deoren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've been using Postfix for years with good results, but in recent
> years have moved to a load-balanced HAProxy front-end with multiple
> backend relay nodes. I've consulted various sources during that time to
> perform the initial setup and
deoren:
> Hi all,
>
> We've been using Postfix for years with good results, but in recent
> years have moved to a load-balanced HAProxy front-end with multiple
> backend relay nodes. I've consulted various sources during that time to
> perform the initial setup and light tuning since then.
>
Hi all,
We've been using Postfix for years with good results, but in recent
years have moved to a load-balanced HAProxy front-end with multiple
backend relay nodes. I've consulted various sources during that time to
perform the initial setup and light tuning since then.
The health checks
17 matches
Mail list logo
