On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:33:58AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > One could argue that the SMTP server should use the external form of the
> > recipient for these lookup, to match downstream behaviour in cleanup(8)...
>
> Indeed. There was no address validation in the initial design and
> implem
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:16:07AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > The lookup keys and RHS values for virtual(5) are in rfc822 format.
> > > A PCRE table can take care of this:
> >
> > Virtual alias lookups are done in the "unquoted" form, while
> > canonical map lookups ar
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:16:07AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The lookup keys and RHS values for virtual(5) are in rfc822 format.
> > A PCRE table can take care of this:
>
> Virtual alias lookups are done in the "unquoted" form, while
> canonical map lookups are in "quoted" form.
No, the cl
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > > Is there something I can do to avoid these rejections (other than the
> > > obvious -- get dba...@example2.com to fix his address book)?
> >
> > Hm, you could try and alias " soli...@example.com" to
> > "
* Victor Duchovni :
> This said, far better to just reject this, and let the sender correct
> their address list.
Yes.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Is there something I can do to avoid these rejections (other than the
> > obvious -- get dba...@example2.com to fix his address book)?
>
> Hm, you could try and alias " soli...@example.com" to
> "soli...@example.com"
>
> But h
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:40:58AM -0330, Doug Robbins wrote:
> Is there something I can do to avoid these rejections (other than
> the obvious -- get dba...@example2.com to fix his address book)?
A milter could remove recipients with spaces and add back ones without
spaces. To do it completely c
On 22-Jan-2010 10:11 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Doug Robbins:
Messages containing leading whitespace in the recipient address are
rejected.
Only if the recipient does not exist.
Example:
Jan 22 08:32:41 vps10 postfix/smtpd[5937]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
smtpout.eastlink.ca[24.222.0.30]:
Doug Robbins:
> Messages containing leading whitespace in the recipient address are
> rejected.
Only if the recipient does not exist.
> Example:
>
> Jan 22 08:32:41 vps10 postfix/smtpd[5937]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> smtpout.eastlink.ca[24.222.0.30]: 550 5.1.1 < soli...@example.com>:
> Re
* Doug Robbins :
> Messages containing leading whitespace in the recipient address are
> rejected.
>
> Example:
>
> Jan 22 08:32:41 vps10 postfix/smtpd[5937]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> smtpout.eastlink.ca[24.222.0.30]: 550 5.1.1 < soli...@example.com>:
> Recipient address rejected: User unknow
Messages containing leading whitespace in the recipient address are
rejected.
Example:
Jan 22 08:32:41 vps10 postfix/smtpd[5937]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
smtpout.eastlink.ca[24.222.0.30]: 550 5.1.1 < soli...@example.com>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table;
fr
11 matches
Mail list logo
